JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE) ›› 2016, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (7): 35-42.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.1.2015.E28

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Personalized search based on folksonomy and category

GUAN Yi-zhou, XU Bo, LIN Yuan, LIN Hong-fei*   

  1. Department of Computer Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, Liaoning, China
  • Received:2015-09-25 Online:2016-07-20 Published:2016-07-27

Abstract: Web 2.0 has provided information retrieval with many useful resources. Two kinds of them are beneficial for personalized search, which are social annotations and categorical information. The annotations that user gives come from his consideration, and the categories of the documents that he annotated reflect his preference and interest. So combining these two kinds of resources will benefit the personalized search. Our work is based on a personalized searching method with only annotations, and we propose a method based on both annotations and categorical information. We use them to screen similar users in preference and interest to extend users profile, so that user extended profile will be more accurate. The experiment based on real dataset proves that our method has superiority.

Key words: social annotation, web categorical, personalized search

CLC Number: 

  • TP309
[1] CARMEL D, ZWERDLING N, GUY I, et al. Personalized social search based on the users social network[C] //Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York: ACM, 2009: 1227-1236.
[2] JOACHIMS T, GRANKA L, PAN B, et al. Accurately interpreting click through data as implicit feedback[C] //Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM, 2005: 154-161.
[3] CHIRITA P A, FIRAN C S, NEJDL W. Personalized query expansion for the web[C] //Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM, 2007: 7-14.
[4] SHEN X, TAN B, ZHAI C X. Implicit user modeling for personalized search[C] //Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York: ACM, 2005: 824-831.
[5] NOLL M G, MEINEL C. The metadata triumvirate: social annotations, anchor texts and search queries[C] //Proceedings of IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference o Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology. Piscataway: IEEE, 2008, 1: 640-647.
[6] JONES K S. A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval[J]. Journal of Documentation, 1972, 28(1): 11-21.
[7] BENZ D, HOTHO A, JÄSCHKE R, et al. Query logs as folksonomies[J]. Datenbank-Spektrum, 2010, 10(1):15-24.
[8] CHOWDHURY G. Introduction to modern information retrieval[M]. London: Facet Publishing, 2010.
[9] SUGIYAMA K, HATANO K, YOSHIKAWA M. Adaptive web search based on user profile constructed without any effort from users[C] //Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web. New York: ACM, 2004: 675-684.
[10] LUXENBURGER J, ELBASSUONI S, WEIKUM G. Task-aware search personalization[C] //Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM, 2008: 721-722.
[11] TEEVAN J, DUMAIS S T, LIEBLING D J. To personalize or not to personalize: modeling queries with variation in user intent[C] //Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM, 2008: 163-170.
[12] MA Z, PANT G, SHENG O R L. Interest-based personalized search[J]. ACM Transactions on Information Systems(TOIS), 2007, 25(1):1-38.
[13] XU S, BAO S, FEI B, et al. Exploring folksonomy for personalized search[C] //Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM, 2008: 155-162.
[14] BOUADJENEK M R, HACID H, BOUZEGHOUB M. Sopra: a new social personalized ranking function for improving web search[C] //Proceedings of the 36th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM, 2013: 861-864.
[15] NOLL M G, MEINEL C. Web search personalization via social bookmarking and tagging[M]. Berlin: Springer Heidelberg, 2007.
[16] ROBERTSON S E, WALKER S. Some simple effective approximations to the 2-poisson model for probabilistic weighted retrieval[C] //Proceedings of the 17th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York:Springer-Verlag, 1994: 232-241.
[17] VALLET D, CANTADOR I, JOSE J M. Personalizing web search with folksonomy-based user and document profiles[J]. Advances in Information Retrieval, 2010: 420-431.
[18] XU Z, LUKASIEWICZ T, TIFREA-MARCIUSKA O. Improving personalized search on the social web based on similarities between users[J]. Springer International Publishing, 2014: 306-319.
[19] BISCHOFF K, FIRAN C S, NEJDL W, et al. Can all tags be used for search?[C] //Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. New York: ACM, 2008: 193-202.
[20] GUO Q, LIU W, LIN Y, et al. Query expansion based on user quality in folksonomy[J]. Information Retrieval Technology, 2012, 7675: 396-405.
[1] YAN Yan, HAO Xiao-hong. Differential privacy partitioning algorithm based on adaptive density grids [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2018, 53(9): 12-22.
[2] JIAO Hong-ru, QIN Jing. Quantum secret sharing scheme realizing all hyperstar quantum access structure [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2018, 53(9): 62-68.
[3] XU Li-dong, WANG Ming-qiang. A meet-in-the-middle attack on 10-round AES-128 [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2018, 53(7): 39-45.
[4] ZHANG Jian-biao, LI Zhi-gang, LIU Guo-jie, WANG Chao, WANG Wei. Process active dynamic measurement method for Windows environment [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2018, 53(7): 46-50.
[5] CUI Zhao-yang, SUN Jia-qi, XU Song-yan, JIANG Xin. A secure clustering algorithm of Ad Hoc network for colony UAVs [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2018, 53(7): 51-59.
[6] LIU Zheng, NIU Fang-lin, QIAN Da-xing, CAI Xi-biao, GUO Ying. Design of anti-eavesdropping code based on fountain codes [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2018, 53(7): 60-64.
[7] LIU Ming-ming, ZHANG Min-qing, LIU Jia, GAO Pei-xian. Steganalysis method based on shallow convolution neural network [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2018, 53(3): 63-70.
[8] RUAN Shu-hua, WENG Jun-hao, MAO Hui, CHEN Xue-lian. Metric model for cloud computing security risk assessment [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2018, 53(3): 71-76.
[9] KANG Hai-yan, HUANG Yu-xuan, CHEN Chu-qiao. Enhancing privacy for geographic information based on video analysis [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2018, 53(1): 19-29.
[10] MENG Bo, LU Jin-tian, WANG De-jun, HE Xu-dong. Survey of security analysis of security protocol implementations [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2018, 53(1): 1-18.
[11] TAN Ren, YIN Xiao-chuan, JIAO Xian-long, LIAN Zhe, CHEN Yu-xin. Software defined APT attack moving target defense network architecture [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2018, 53(1): 38-45.
[12] SUN Ze-rui, WANG Ji-jun, LI Guo-xiang, XIA Guo-en. New reversible data hiding algorithm based on interpolation images [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2018, 53(1): 46-52.
[13] SUN Liang, CHEN Xiao-chun, ZHONG Yang, LIN Zhi-peng, REN Tong. Secure startup mechanism of server based on trusted BMC [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2018, 53(1): 89-94.
[14] YAO Ke, ZHU Bin-rui, QIN Jing. Verifiable public key searchable encryption protocol based on biometrics [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2017, 52(11): 11-22.
[15] HAN Pan-pan, QIN Jing. Verifiable and searchable encryption scheme for outsourced database in cloud computing [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2017, 52(9): 41-53.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!