JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE) ›› 2021, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (3): 12-22.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.0.2020.493

•   • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Value-added service investment and pricing of logistics service platform under dynamic competition

Yun-miao GUI1(),Da-yu LIU1,Hong-chun HU2,*()   

  1. 1. School of Economics and Management, Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu 241000, Anhui, China
    2. Staff Development Institute of China National Tobacco Corporation, Zhengzhou 450008, Henan, China
  • Received:2020-09-14 Online:2021-03-20 Published:2021-03-16
  • Contact: Hong-chun HU E-mail:ymgui@ahpu.edu.cn;759150070@qq.com

Abstract:

Investment in value-added services has become an important means for logistics service platforms to enhance their competitive advantages. Based on the consideration of the network externality and users ownership behavior, the investment decision-making and pricing model of logistics service platform under different investment time series is developed, which combined Hotelling model and Stackelberg master-slave game model. The results show that: when the bilateral users are single-homing, the investment in high-quality value-added services is dominant; when the consumers are multi-homing and the suppliers are single-homing, the acted platform investment in high-quality value-added services is better; when the suppliers are multi-homing and the consumers are single-homing, the acting platform prefer to invest high-quality value-added services; when the bilateral users are multi-homing, the investment in high-quality value-added services is optimal.

Key words: logistics service platform, users ownership, value-added services, network externality

CLC Number: 

  • F272.3

Fig.1

Profit comparison between platform 1 and 2"

Fig.2

Profit comparison between platform 1 and 2"

1 ARMSTRONG M . Competition in two-sided markets[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 2006, 37 (3): 668- 691.
doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00037.x
2 ROCHET J C , TIROLE J . Two-sided markets: a progress report[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 2006, 37 (3): 645- 667.
doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00036.x
3 邢大宁, 赵启兰, 郜红虎. 基于双边市场理论的物流信息平台定价策略研究[J]. 商业经济与管理, 2018, (6): 5- 15.
XING Daning , ZHAO Qilan , GAO Honghu . Study of pricing strategies for logistics information platform based on the theory of two-sided markets[J]. Journal of Business Economics, 2018, (6): 5- 15.
4 卢珂, 周晶, 林小围. 考虑交叉网络外部性的网约车平台市场定价研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28 (7): 169- 178.
LU Ke , ZHOU Jing , LIN Xiaowei . Pricing research of ride-hailing platform: from the view of inter-group network externality[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28 (7): 169- 178.
5 王志宏, 傅长涛. 用户不同归属行为下货运共享平台的定价策略研究[J]. 管理学报, 2019, 16 (7): 1081- 1087.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2019.07.015
WANG Zhihong , FU Changtao . Research on pricing strategy of freight transport sharing platform under different behaviors of users[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2019, 16 (7): 1081- 1087.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2019.07.015
6 张千帆, 董雪. 提供增值服务情形下互联网平台的定价策略[J]. 系统工程, 2018, 36 (2): 47- 54.
ZHANG Qianfan , DONG Xue . Pricing strategy of Internet platform providing value-added services[J]. Systems Engineering, 2018, 36 (2): 47- 54.
7 BELLEFLAMME P , PEITZ M . Platform competition and seller investment incentives[J]. European Economic Review, 2010, 54 (8): 1059- 1076.
doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2010.03.001
8 ANDERSON E G , PAEKER G G , TAN B . Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities[J]. Information Systems Research, 2014, 25 (1): 152- 172.
doi: 10.1287/isre.2013.0505
9 豆国威. 双边平台增值服务的投资和定价策略研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2016.
DOU Guowei. The value-added services investment and pricing strategy on bilateral platform[D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2016.
10 桂云苗, 武众, 龚本刚. 竞争环境下B2C平台增值服务投资决策[J]. 控制与决策, 2019, 34 (2): 395- 405.
GUI Yunmiao , WU Zhong , GONG Bengang . Value-added service investment decision of B2C platform in competition[J]. Control and Decision, 2019, 34 (2): 395- 405.
11 HAGIU A , SPULBER D . First-party content and coordination in two-sided markets[J]. Management Science, 2013, 59 (4): 933- 949.
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1577
[1] Lemin LIU,Feng LU,Zhichao FU,Zuqing PAN,Lei XIE. Evolutionary game on government participation in expressways digital transformation [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2024, 59(9): 98-107.
[2] Cong SHI,Guitao ZHANG,Xiao ZHANG,Shuaicheng LIN. Platform supply chain network operation decision based on blockchain technology under cap-and-trade regulation [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2024, 59(1): 100-114, 123.
[3] Youguo JING,Junling REN,Xiaoyang LIU,Hailong WANG,Jian SONG. Channel entry and buyback strategies of heterogeneous products under mixed leasing and retail channels [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2023, 58(7): 1-17.
[4] ZHANG Ke-yong, ZHANG Na. Green supply chain pricing and coordination with reciprocal preferences under government subsidies [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2022, 57(1): 30-41.
[5] GUI Yun-miao, HU Hong-chun, GONG Ben-gang. Research on information disclosure decision of bilateral platform in the blockchain era [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2022, 57(3): 89-95.
[6] SHEN Liang, LIN Fei, WANG Yuyan, DING Luping, FAN Runjie, YANG Xiaoguang. Financial subsidies, green consumption willingness and corporate green innovation [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2025, 60(6): 76-88.
[7] GUI Yunmiao, YANG Lan, HU Hongchun. Blockchain service investment decision of logistics platform under two-sided market [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2025, 60(6): 63-75.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!