您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(理学版)》

《山东大学学报(理学版)》 ›› 2023, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (1): 101-110.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.0.2021.564

• • 上一篇    

基于含时网络与随机矩阵理论的投资组合研究

赵霞1,2,朱钇频1*,杨雅婕3,许澜涛1   

  1. 1.上海对外经贸大学统计与信息学院, 上海 201620;2.上海对外经贸大学金融大数据与精算科学研究中心, 上海 201620;3.西北工业大学管理学院, 陕西 西安 710129
  • 发布日期:2023-02-12
  • 作者简介:赵霞(1972— ),女,博士,教授,研究方向为金融统计、风险管理与精算. E-mail:zhaoxia-w@163.com*通信作者简介:朱钇频(1997— ),女,硕士,研究方向为金融统计.E-mail: zoey_pin@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(71671104,11971301)

Portfolio research based on temporal network and random matrix theory

ZHAO Xia1,2, ZHU Yi-pin1*, YANG Ya-jie3, XU Lan-tao1   

  1. 1. School of Statistics and Information, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai 201620, China;
    2. Research Center for Financial Big Data and Actuarial Science, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai 201620, China;
    3. School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xian 710129, Shaanxi, China
  • Published:2023-02-12

摘要: 考虑到资产收益率间复杂的线性和非线性动态相关及演化关系,基于Pearson相关系数、Kendall秩相关系数和Tail相关系数等构建含时网络并结合随机矩阵理论,研究最优投资策略问题。为了对比不同相依关系、不同中心性测度及是否降噪对投资策略的影响,构建了9个资产筛选网络模型,并基于上证180指数数据,求解最优投资策略,分析其内样本和外样本表现。研究发现:在Kendall和Tail相关系数下的模型所选资产组合可以有更低的交易成本,运用随机矩阵理论进行降噪能显著提升投资收益,含时条件中心性测度的引入有助于筛选出更优的资产组合。

关键词: 含时网络, 随机矩阵理论, 含时条件中心性测度, 投资组合

Abstract: Considering the complex linear and non-linear dynamic relationship and evolutional information among assets, temporal networks are constructed based on Pearson correlation coefficient, Kendall rank correlation coefficient and Tail correlation coefficient, and further deal with their noise reductions through random matrix, employ conditional centrality of temporal network as selection standard of optimal asset portfolio. Nine network models for asset screening are constructed from three aspects of dependency relationship, matrix noise reduction and central measure, and the mean-variance optimal strategy is further calculated based on SSE 180 indices. The in-sample and out-of-sample performances of investment strategies under different models are compared through indicators such as portfolio turnover and Omega ratio. The results show that the portfolio selected by the model with Kendall and Tail correlation coefficients has lower transaction costs. The application of random matrix theory can significantly improve investment returns and the introduction of temporal conditional centrality is helpful to screen out better portfolios.

Key words: temporal network, random matrix theory, temporal conditional centrality, portfolio optimization

中图分类号: 

  • F830.9
[1] AMINI H, CONT R, MINCA A. Resilience to contagion in financial networks[J]. Mathematical Finance, 2016, 26(2):329-365.
[2] ANAND K, CRAIG B, VON PETER G. Filling in the blanks: network structure and interbank contagion[J]. Quantitative Finance, 2015, 15(4):625-636.
[3] BARGIGLI L, DI IASIO G, INFANTE L, et al. The multiplex structure of interbank networks[J]. Quantitative Finance, 2015, 15(4):673-691.
[4] NEVEU A R. A survey of network-based analysis and systemic risk measurement[J]. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 2018, 13(2):241-281.
[5] 陈国进,马长峰. 金融危机传染的网络理论研究述评[J]. 经济学动态, 2010(2):116-120. CHEN Guojin, MA Changfeng. A review of network theory research on financial crisis contagion[J]. Economic Perspectives, 2010, 2:116-120.
[6] 许忠好,李天奇.基于复杂网络的中国股票市场统计特征分析[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2017, 52(5):41-48. XU Zhonghao, LI Tianqi. Analysison statistical characteristic of Chinese stock market based on complex networks[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Natural Science), 2017, 52(5):41-48.
[7] 张兴敏,傅强,张帅,等. 金融系统的网络结构及尾部风险度量: 基于动态半参数分位数回归模型[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(4):59-70. ZHANG Xingmin, FU Qiang, ZHANG Shuai, et al. Financial system network contagion structure and tail risk measurement based on dynamic semiparametric quantile regression model[J]. Management Review, 2021, 33(4):59-70.
[8] ONNELA J P, CHAKRABORTI A, KASKI K, et al. Dynamics of market correlations: taxonomy and portfolio analysis[J]. Physical Review E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 2003, 68:056110.
[9] POZZI F, DI MATTEO T, ASTE T. Spread of risk across financial markets: better to invest in the peripheries[J]. Scientific Reports, 2013, 3:1665.
[10] PERALTA G, ZAREEI A. A network approach to portfolio selection[J]. Journal of Empirical Finance, 2016, 38:157-180.
[11] VYROST T, LYÓCSA S, BAUMÖHL E. Network-based asset allocation strategies[J]. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 2019, 47:516-536.
[12] LI Y, JIANG X F, TIAN Y, et al. Portfolio optimization based on network topology[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2019, 515:671-681.
[13] CLEMENTE G P, GRASSI R, HITAJ A. Asset allocation: new evidence through network approaches[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2021, 299(1/2):61-80.
[14] 陈诗,任卓明,刘闯,等. 时序网络中关键节点的识别方法研究进展[J]. 电子科技大学学报, 2020, 49(2):291-314. CHEN Shi, REN Zhuoming, LIU Chuang, et al. Identification methods of vital nodes on temporal networks[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2020, 49(2):291-314.
[15] KIM H, ANDERSON R. Temporal node centrality in complex networks[J]. Physical Review E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 2012, 85:026107.
[16] HUANG D W, YU Z G. Dynamic-sensitive centrality of nodes in temporal networks[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1):1-11.
[17] TAYLOR D, MYERS S A, CLAUSET A, et al. Eigenvector-based centrality measures for temporal networks[J]. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation: a SIAM Interdisciplinary Journal, 2017, 15(1):537-574.
[18] HUANG Q J, ZHAO C L, ZHANG X, et al. Centrality measures in temporal networks with time series analysis[J]. EPL(Europhysics Letters), 2017, 118(3):36001.
[19] 杨剑楠,刘建国,郭强. 基于层间相似性的时序网络节点重要性研究[J]. 物理学报, 2018, 67(4):048901. YANG Jiannan, LIU Jianguo, GUO Qiang. Node importance idenfication for temporal network based on inter-layer similarity[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2018, 67(4):048901.
[20] 胡钢,许丽鹏,徐翔.基于时序网络层间同构率动态演化的重要节点辨识[J]. 物理学报, 2021, 70(10):108901. HU Gang, XU Lipeng, XU Xiang. Identification of important nodes based on dynamic evolution of inter-layer isomorphism rate in temporal networks[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2021, 70(10):108901.
[21] ZHAO L F, WANG G J, WANG M G, et al. Stock market as temporal network[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2018, 506:1104-1112.
[22] 韩华,吴翎燕,宋宁宁. 基于随机矩阵的金融网络模型[J]. 物理学报, 2014, 63(13):439-448. HAN Hua, WU Lingyan, SONG Ningning. Financial networks model based on random matrix[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2014, 63(13):439-448.
[23] 李冰娜,惠晓峰,李连江. 基于蒙特卡洛RMT去噪法小股票组合风险优化研究[J]. 管理科学, 2016, 29(2):134-145. LI Bingna, HUI Xiaofeng, LI Lianjiang. Research on risk optimization of small stock portfolio based on the filtering method of RMT using Monte Carlo simulation[J]. Journal of Management Science, 2016, 29(2):134-145.
[24] 谢赤,胡珏,王钢金.基于随机矩阵理论的股市网络拓扑性质研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018, 27(1):144-152. XIE Chi, HU Jue, WANG Gangjin. Study on topological property of stock markets network based on random matric method[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2018, 27(1):144-152.
[25] MANTEGNA R N. Hierarchical structure in financial markets[J]. The European Physical Journal B:Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 1999, 11(1):193-197.
[26] WATTS D J, STROGATZ S H. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks[J]. Nature, 1998, 393:440-442.
[27] WIGNER E P. On the statistical distribution of the widths and spacings of nuclear resonance levels[J]. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 1951, 47(4):790-798.
[28] LALOUX L, CIZEAU P, BOUCHAUD J P, et al. Noise dressing of financial correlation matrices[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1999, 83(7):1467-1470.
[29] PLEROU V, GOPIKRISHNAN P, ROSENOW B, et al. Random matrix approach to cross correlations in financial data[J]. Physical Review E, 2002, 65(6):066126.
[30] SHARIFI S, CRANE M, SHAMAIE A, et al. Random matrix theory for portfolio optimization: a stability approach[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2004, 335(3/4):629-643.
[31] KENETT D Y, SHAPIRA Y, BEN-JACOB E. RMT assessments of the market latent information embedded in the stocks raw, normalized, and partial correlations[J]. Journal of Probability and Statistics, 2009, 72:657-669.
[1] 吕小妮1,王艳彩2,高岳林2. BVaR风险度量下限制性卖空的单位风险收益最大投资组合模型[J]. J4, 2013, 48(05): 92-96.
[2] 崔玉泉1,马立杰2,赵晶3,白金燕4. DEA方法在投资组合中的应用[J]. J4, 2011, 46(2): 82-88.
[3] 安起光,王厚杰 . 基于机会约束的均值—VaR投资组合模型再研究[J]. J4, 2006, 41(2): 94-100 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!