您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(理学版)》

J4

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

城市纳污河道废水化学强化一级处理的研究

许春华,高宝玉*,卢磊,徐世平,曹百川,岳钦艳,张建   

  1. 山东大学环境科学与工程学院, 山东济南250100
  • 收稿日期:2005-08-28 修回日期:2005-10-10 出版日期:2006-10-24 发布日期:2006-10-24
  • 通讯作者: 高宝玉

Study of chemically enhanced primary treatment of wastewater received by urban rivers

XU Chun-hua, GAO Bao-yu, LU Lei, XU Shi-ping, CAO Bai-chuan, YUE Qin-yan and ZHANG Jian   

  1. School of Environmental Science and Engineering of Shandong Uni., Jinan 250100, Shandong, China
  • Received:2005-08-28 Revised:2005-10-10 Online:2006-10-24 Published:2006-10-24
  • Contact: GAO Bao-yu

摘要: 针对山东省淄博市猪龙河和白家河城市纳污河道水质的特点,进行了化学强化一级处理该河道废水的研究.初步筛选出聚合氯化铝(PAC)、阳离子型聚丙烯酰胺(CPAM)、阴离子型聚丙烯酰胺(APAM)和聚二甲基二烯丙基氯化铵(PDMDAAC)混凝剂,研究了它们对该废水中COD、溶解性COD(SCOD)、浊度、总氮(NT)和总磷(PT)的去除效果,选出了适于该废水水质的混凝剂为APAM和PDMDAAC.研究了pH值和表面负荷对混凝效果的影响.研究结果发明,APAM在最佳投加量0.3?mg/L时,对COD和SCOD的去除率分别为44%~64%和33%~67%;PDMDAAC在最佳投加量0.5?mg/L时,对COD和SCOD的去除率分别为51%~60%和21%~67%.APAM和PDMDAAC对NT去除率较低,约为15%~20%,但对PT具有较高的去除率,为60%~80%.APAM和PDMDAAC对COD的去除效果受pH值影响较小,在pH 7~10范围内均具有较好的混凝效果.研究结果表明,表面负荷从0.8?m3/m2·h提高到1.2?m3/m2·h时,COD和浊度去除率变化不大. 〖GK2*2]Abstract

关键词: 城市纳污河道废水, 化学强化一级处理, 混凝效果 , PDMDAAC, APAM

Abstract: The chemically enhanced primary treatment of wastewater received by the Zhulong River and Baijia River in the city of Zibo, Shandong, China has been studied. According to the characteristics of the rivers, their water quality, and the wastewater received, several coagulants were selected to use in the experiments conducted at the rivers, including polyaluminum chloride (PAC), cationic polyacrylamide (CPAM), anionic polyacrylamide (APAM) and polydimethyldiallylammonium chloride (PDMDAAC). Their efficiencies for removing COD, SCOD, turbidity, NT and PT were investigated and compared. APAM and PDMDAAC were found to be the most appropriate coagulants. The impact of surface load and pH on the effectiveness of coagulation was also considered and analyzed. The results showed that at the optimum dosage of APAM (0.3?mg/L), the COD and SCOD removal efficiencies reached to 44%~64% and 33%~67%, respectively, while at the optimum dosage of PDMDAAC (0.5?mg/L), COD and SCOD removal efficiencies were 51%~60% and 21%~67%, respectively. Both APAM and PDMDAAC achieved a lower efficiency, 15%~20%, in removing NT, whereas they had a higher PT removal efficiency that was 60%~80%. It was found that pH had a very little effect on the efficiency of COD removal, and better coagulation could be achieved when pH was in the range of 7~10. The results also showed that there was insignificant change in COD and turbidity removal efficiency when surface load was increased from 0.8?m3/m2·h to 1.2?m3/m2·h.

Key words: PDMDAAC , APAM, chemically enhanced primary treatment, wastewater in urban river

中图分类号: 

  • X135
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!