您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(理学版)》

J4 ›› 2009, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (7): 49-54.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

稀疏规则网格中带反馈机制的SIS模型

张达敏1,蔡绍洪2,周海平1,郭长睿1   

  1. 1. 贵州大学计算机科学与信息学院, 贵州 贵阳 550025;  2. 贵州财经学院信息技术学院, 贵州 贵阳 550004
  • 收稿日期:2008-10-09 出版日期:2009-07-16 发布日期:2009-11-01
  • 作者简介:张达敏(1967-),男,博士研究生,研究方向为复杂网络传播动力学.Email:ie.dmzhang@gzu.edu.cn蔡绍洪(1958-),男,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为非平衡统计物理.Email:aa.shcai@gzu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(10647005);贵州省教育厅科学技术基金资助

    项目(2007321)

SIS model with a feedback mechanism on sparsely distributed regular  lattices

ZHANG Damin1, CAI Shaohong2, ZHOU Haiping1, GUO Changrui1   

  1. 1. School of Computer Science and Information, Guizhou University, Guiyang 5500 25, Guizhou, China;2. School of Information, Guizhou College of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 5500 04, Guizhou, China
  • Received:2008-10-09 Online:2009-07-16 Published:2009-11-01

摘要:

基于群体稀疏分布的二维规则网格,提出了一个考虑群体自身的反馈机制、群体密度和群体流动的SIS模型。研究表明:反馈机制对系统的稳态感染比例有较大影响,但对传播阈值没有影响;在传播效率固定的前提下,群体密度越大,系统的稳态感染比例也越大,而且群体密度存在一个阈值,只有当群体密度大于该阈值时,疾病才能在群体中持续稳定地传播。另外,在群体密度不太大时,群体流动时的稳态感染比例要高于群体静止时的稳态感染比例,这说明群体流动更有利于疾病的传播。

关键词: 反馈机制;群体密度;群体流动;SIS模型

Abstract:

An SIS model related to feedback mechanism, crowddensity and crowd moving on sparse distributed regular lattices is proposed. It is shown that  feedback greatly  impacts on the stable infected ratio but does not impact on the spreading threshold of the system. If the spreading efficiency is fixed, the crowddensity is larger and the stable infected ratio is higher. Moreover, there is a crowddensity threshold in this model. Only when the crowddensity is above the threshold,  the disease continuously and steadily spread in a crowd.  The stable infected ratio of a moving crowd is higher than that of a static crowd in the case of low crowddensity, which indicates that the moving activity of individuals can promote the disease spread in the case of low crowd density.

Key words: eedback mechanism; crowd density; crowd moving; SIS model

中图分类号: 

  • O4156
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!