您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（理学版）》

山东大学学报（理学版） ›› 2018, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (5): 12-29.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.0.2017.268

• • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑零售商公平关切和风险规避的绿色供应链最优决策

刘京,周岩*,郑英杰,王超胜   

  1. 青岛大学管理科学与工程系, 山东 青岛 266071
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-31 出版日期:2018-05-20 发布日期:2018-05-25
  • 作者简介:刘京(1991— ), 男, 硕士研究生, 研究方向为供应链管理. E-mail:444582782@qq.com*通信作者简介:周岩(1979— ),女, 博士研究生, 副教授, 研究方向为供应链管理. E-mail:yanyanz22@hotmail.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(71371102,71740011);中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目(2016M592151);山东省研究生教育创新计划项目(SDYY15032);山东省自然科学基金资助项目(ZR2016GM01)

Optimal decision-making for green supply chain considering retailers fairness concern and risk aversion

LIU Jing, ZHOU Yan*, ZHENG Ying-jie, WANG Chao-sheng   

  1. Department of Management Science and Engineering, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, China
  • Received:2017-05-31 Online:2018-05-20 Published:2018-05-25

PDF (PC)

700

摘要： 为研究随机市场需求的绿色供应链问题,分别在零售商只考虑公平关切、只考虑风险规避及同时考虑公平关切和风险规避情形下, 建立绿色供应链博弈模型,研究了零售商的公平关切行为以及风险规避行为对绿色供应链最优决策的影响。研究结果表明: 与公平中性和风险中性时最优决策相比,零售商的公平关切行为、风险规避行为都会影响绿色供应链最优决策,且随着零售商公平关切和风险规避程度的增大,绿色产品最优批发价格、绿色度水平、零售价格、 绿色供应链各决策者期望利润及整体期望利润的变化都有规律性,在不同的产品绿色化效率下,存在着不同的变化趋势。

关键词: 公平关切, 绿色供应链, 风险规避

Abstract: To study the problem of a green supply chain with uncertain demand, the game models of the green supply chain considering only retailers fairness concern, only retailers risk aversion and both fairness concern and risk aversion were constructed. The impact of retailers fairness concern and risk aversion on the optimal decisions of manufacturer and retailer as well as the overall optimal decisions of the green supply chain are studied. The results show that retailers fair concerns and risk aversion influent the optimal decisions of the green supply chain comparing with those of fair neutral and risk neutral retail. The optimal decisions, expected profits and overall profit of the green supply chain change accordingly to the degree of retailers fairness concern and risk aversion, and the trends under the various green efficiency are different.

Key words: risk aversion, fairness concern, green supply chain

中图分类号: 

  • F274
[1] ZHU Q, SARKIS J, LAI K H. Institutional-based antecedents and performance outcomes of internal and external green supply chain management practices[J]. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 2013, 19(2): 106-117.
[2] JAYARAM J, AVITTATHUR B. Green supply chains: a perspective from an emerging economy[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 164: 234-244.
[3] FAHIMNIA B, SARKIS J, DAVARZANI H. Green supply chain management: a review and bibliometric analysis[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 162: 101-114.
[4] ZHANG L, WANG J, YOU J. Consumer environmental awareness and channel coordination with two substitutable products[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2015, 241(1): 63-73.
[5] XI S, LEE C. A game theoretic approach for the optimal investment decisions of green innovation in a manufacturerretailer supply chain[J]. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 2015, 22(1): 147-158.
[6] ZHU W, HE Y. Green product design in supply chains under competition[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 258: 165-180.
[7] 周永圣, 刘巧荣, 李健, 等. 基于绿色信贷的政府促进银行实施代理监督权的博弈研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2015, 35(7): 1744-1751. ZHOU Yongsheng, LIU Qiaorong, LI Jian, et al. Game model for governments to promote banks as the agency to supervise the implementation of green supply chain based on green credit[J]. Systems Engineering—Theory and Practice, 2015, 35(7): 1744-1751.
[8] 江世英, 李随成. 考虑产品绿色度的绿色供应链博弈模型及收益共享契约[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(6): 169-176. JIANG Shiying, LI Suicheng. Green supply chain game models and revenue sharing contract with product green degree[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(6): 169-176.
[9] LOCH C H, WU Y. Social preferences and supply chain performance: an experimental study[J]. Management Science, 2008, 54(11): 1835-1849.
[10] CUI T H, RAJU J S, ZHANG Z J. Fairness and channel coordination[J]. Management Science, 2007, 53(8): 1303-1314.
[11] DU S, NIE T, CHU C, et al. Newsvendor model for a dyadic supply chain with Nash bargaining fairness concerns[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2014, 52(17): 5070-5085.
[12] QIN Y. Supply chain coordination model under fairness concern of retailer and supplier[J]. Journal of Information and Computational Science, 2014, 11(1): 211-217.
[13] WU X, NIEDERHOFF J A. Fairness in selling to the newsvendor[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2015, 23(11): 2002-2022.
[14] NICOSIA G, PACIFICI A, PFERSCHY U. Price of fairness for allocating a bounded resource[J]. European Journal of Opera-tional Research, 2017, 257(3): 933-943.
[15] NIE T, DU S. Dual-fairness supply chain with quantity discount contracts[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 258: 491-500.
[16] AN Q, CHEN H, XIONG B, et al. Target intermediate products setting in a two-stage system with fairness concern[J]. Omega, 2017, 73:49-59.
[17] 杜少甫, 朱贾昂, 高冬, 等. Nash讨价还价公平关切框架下的供应链优化决策[J]. 管理科学学报, 2013, 16(3): 68-72. DU Shaofu, ZHU Jiaang, GAO Dong, et al. Nash bargaining fair concern under the framework of supply chain optimization decisions[J]. Journal of Management Science in China, 2013, 16(3): 68-72, 81.
[18] 浦徐进, 诸葛瑞杰. 考虑供应商过度自信和公平关切的供应链双边努力行为研究[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2014, 20(6): 1462-1470. PU Xujin, ZHUGE Ruijie. Bilateral efforts of supply chains considering suppliers overconfidence and fairness[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2014, 20(6): 1462-1470.
[19] HSIEH C C, LIU Y T. Manufacturers return policy in a two-stage supply chain with two risk-averse retailers and random demand[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 207(1): 514-523.
[20] KAZAZ B, WEBSTER S. Technical note-price-setting newsvendor problems with uncertain supply and risk aversion[J]. Operations Research, 2015, 63(4): 807-811.
[21] LIU M, CAO E, SALIFOU CK. Pricing strategies of a dual-channel supply chain with risk aversion[J]. Transportation Research Part E, 2016, 90: 108-120.
[22] ZHOU Y W, LI J, ZHONG Y. Cooperative advertising and ordering policies in a two-echelon supply chain with risk-averse agents[J]. Omega, 2018, 75:97-117.
[23] 徐广业, 张旭梅. 风险规避下基于价格折扣的双渠道供应链协调[J]. 系统管理学报, 2016, 25(6): 1114-1120. XU Guangye, ZHANG Xumei. Coordinating the dual-channel risk-averse supply chain based on price discount[J]. Journal of Systems and Management, 2016, 25(6): 1114-1120.
[24] 浦徐进, 诸葛瑞杰, 包含. 零售商风险规避和公平关切对供应链运作的影响研究[J]. 软科学, 2014, 28(7): 76-81. PU Xujin, ZHUGE Ruijie, BAO Han. Research on supply chain operation mechanisms with the considering of risk aversion and fairness preference of retailers[J]. Soft Science, 2014, 28(7):76-81.
[25] 魏光兴, 林强, 覃燕红. 同时考虑风险规避和公平偏好的双渠道供应链定价决策[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(社会科学), 2016, 30(12): 50-58. WEI Guangxing, LIN Qiang, QIN Yanhong. Optimal pricing strategies of dualchannel supply chain under risk aversion and fairness preference[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Social Science), 2016, 30(12):50-58.
[26] 曲优, 关志民, 邱若臻, 等. 公平关切与损失规避对混合双渠道供应链订货策略的影响[J]. 管理学报, 2017, 14(1): 129-138. QU You, GUAN Zhimin, QIU Ruozhen, et al. Impact of members fairness preference and loss-averse on order strategy in hybrid dual-channel supply chain[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2017, 14(1):129-138.
[27] 李媛, 赵道致. 考虑公平偏好的低碳化供应链两部定价契约协调[J]. 管理评论, 2014, 26(1):159-167. LI Yuan, ZHAO Daozhi. Low-carbonization supply chain two-part tariff coordination based on fairness preference[J]. Manage Comments, 2014, 26(1):159-167.
[28] 刘琦铀, 张成科, 宾宁, 等. 公平关切及低碳视角下供应链两部定价契约问题研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(10):60-68. LIU Qiyou, ZHANG Chengke, BIN Ning, et al. Supply chain two part tariff contract with fairness preference and carbon emissions[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(10):60-68.
[29] 石松, 颜波, 石平. 考虑公平关切的自主减排低碳供应链决策研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2016, 36(12): 3079-3091. SHI Song, YAN Bo, SHI Ping. Pricing and coordination decisions in autonomous reduction low-carbon supply chain with fairness concerns[J]. Systems Engineering—Theory and Practice, 2016, 36(12): 3079-3091.
[30] 江世英, 李随成,王欢. 考虑风险规避的绿色供应链定价决策[J]. 系统工程, 2016, 34(3): 94-100. JIANG Shiying, LI Suicheng, WANG Huan. Pricing decision of green supply chain considering risk aversion[J]. Systems Engineering, 2016, 34(3):94-100.
[1] 陈良,胡劲松. 风险规避对不同类型双渠道供应链决策的影响[J]. 山东大学学报（理学版）, 2018, 53(5): 30-40.
[2] 张克勇1,吴燕1,侯世旺2. 零售商公平关切下闭环供应链定价策略研究[J]. J4, 2013, 48(05): 83-91.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(理学版)》编辑部　
地址: 山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区（250100）　电话: +86-0531-88366917　E-mail: xblxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发