您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（理学版）》

《山东大学学报(理学版)》 ›› 2024, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (9): 64-78.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.0.2023.102

•   • 上一篇    下一篇

资金约束和交叉持股下低碳供应链的融资决策

王玉燕1(),孙煜林2,林飞3   

  1. 1. 山东财经大学管理科学与工程学院, 山东 济南 250014
    2. 悉尼大学工程学院, 新南威尔士州 悉尼 2006
    3. 山东财经大学财政税务学院, 山东 济南 250014
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-22 出版日期:2024-09-20 发布日期:2024-10-10
  • 作者简介:王玉燕(1978—)，女，教授，博士生导师，博士，研究方向博弈论与供应链管理. E-mail：wangyuyan1224@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(71971129);山东省高等学校青创科技支持计划项目(2019RWG017);济南市自主培养创新团队项目(202228075);泰山学者工程专项项目(tsqn202211197)

Financing models of low-carbon supply chain under capital constraints and cross-shareholding

Yuyan WANG1(),Yulin SUN2,Fei LIN3   

  1. 1. School of Management Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014, Shandong, China
    2. Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, New South Wales, Australia
    3. School of Public Finance and Taxation, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan 250014, Shandong, China
  • Received:2023-03-22 Online:2024-09-20 Published:2024-10-10

RichHTML

1

PDF (PC)

205

摘要：

探讨资金约束与交叉持股环境下供应商主导的低碳供应链融资决策问题。考虑由供应商和资金约束的制造商组成的交叉持股供应链, 构建了无资金约束、银行融资以及贸易信贷融资模型。在此基础上, 给出制造商的融资决策以及供应商偏好的制造商融资决策, 并探索了交叉持股比例、消费者环境意识等因素对企业经济和碳减排水平的影响。研究表明: 贸易信贷融资能够实现碳减排和缓解资金约束的双赢, 但资金约束的制造商始终选择银行融资确保获得更高利润, 且随制造商持有供应商的股份比例增加, 偏好更明显。供应商更趋于制造商选择贸易信贷融资, 始终有为制造商提供贸易信贷融资的动机。无论哪种融资模型, 供应商持有制造商的股份比例增加都使得“强者更强, 弱者更弱”。银行融资下, 制造商持有供应商的股份比例的增加, 能够缩小利润差距, 缓解利润分配不公。

关键词: 低碳供应链, 交叉持股, 银行融资, 贸易信贷融资, 资金约束

Abstract:

This paper explores the issue of supplier-led supply chain financing decisions in a low-carbon and cross-holding environment. Considering cross-shareholding, this paper studies the supply chain composed of a well-funded supplier and a capital-constrained manufacturer. Three models of non-financing, bank financing, and trade credit financing are constructed respectively. On this basis, the financing models that the manufacturer preferred and the supplier preferred are given. Also, the impacts of the cross-shareholding ratio and consumers' environmental awareness on the economic performance and emission-reduction level are discussed. The conclusions are as follows. Trade credit financing can achieve a win-win situation of reducing emissions and easing capital constraints. However, the capital-constrained manufacturer will always choose bank financing for a higher profit, and the manufacturer increasing shareholdings in the supplier enhances its preference for bank financing. The supplier prefers the manufacturer to choose trade credit financing and is always willing to provide trade credits. Under the trade credit financing model, the manufacturer will not gain more decision power even if it has more shareholdings in the supplier. Under the bank financing model, the manufacturer increasing shareholdings in the supplier can narrow the profit gap and alleviate the unfair profit distribution. The supplier increasing shareholdings in the manufacturer will increase the supplier's profit, but will not always increase the manufacturer's profit.

Key words: low-carbon supply chain, cross-shareholding, bank financing, trade credit financing, capital constraint

中图分类号: 

  • F406.7

图1

二级供应链模型结构"

表1

模型符号"

符号 含义
α 潜在市场需求
β 产品需求价格敏感系数, β>0
? 产品需求低碳敏感系数, ?>0
B 制造商初始资金
ci 供应链成员i的单位零部件生产成本
k 制造商减排成本系数, k>0
rb 银行利率, 0＜rb＜1
rt 延迟付款利率, 0＜rt＜1
wj 零部件批发价格, 供应商决策变量
ej 碳减排水平, 制造商决策变量
qj 零部件订购量, 制造商决策变量
pj 制成品零售价格
μs 供应商持有制造商的股份比例, 0＜μs＜0.5
μm 制造商持有供应商的股份比例, 0＜μm＜0.5
πij 供应链成员利润
Δπj 供应商与制造商利润差距, 其中Δπj=πjs-πjm

图2

供应链成员的事件发生时序"

图3

制造商选择不同融资模型的边界图"

图4

最优决策随μs的变化"

图5

最优决策随μm的变化"

图6

最优利润随μs的变化"

图7

最优利润随μm的变化"

1 鹿鸣君. 北汽戴姆勒双方交叉持股, 开展长期合作[N/OL]. 界面新闻[2022-12-08](2021-12-13). https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1719016073592324769&wfr=spider&for=pc.
2 Auto车探. 雅马哈与丰田的几次合作, 每次合作都能令车迷倾家荡产![EB/OL]. (2019-01-02). https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1621540347729622931&wfr=spider&for=pc
3 WU D S , ZHANG C H , PAN Y C , et al. The supply chain effects on order strategy of cross-shareholdings[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2021, 59 (22): 6848- 6863.
doi: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1828639
4 GAIGNÉ C , LATOUCHE K , TUROLLA S . Vertical ownership and export performance: firm-level evidence from the food industry[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2018, 100 (1): 46- 72.
doi: 10.1093/ajae/aax071
5 LUCO F , MARSHALL G . The competitive impact of vertical integration by multiproduct firms[J]. American Economic Review, 2020, 110 (7): 2041- 2064.
doi: 10.1257/aer.20180071
6 XIAO Wei , LI Kai , FU Hong . Quality investment in a decentralized assembly system with backward shareholding[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2021, 242, 108291.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108291
7 师苑, 王新华, 高红伟. Bertrand寡占市场企业交叉持股时定价策略和最优持股的研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29 (2): 42- 50.
SHI Yuan , WANG Xinhua , GAO Hongwei . Pricing strategy and optimal shareholding of bertrand duopoly firms with cross-shareholding[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29 (2): 42- 50.
8 师苑, 王新华, 高红伟. 三级供应链企业间交叉持股时均衡定价及市场绩效研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30 (9): 145- 151.
SHI Yuan , WANG Xinhua , GAO Hongwei . Research on equilibrium pricing and market performance of firms in three-tier supply chain with cross-shareholding[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30 (9): 145- 151.
9 万骁乐, 王欢欢, 杜元伟, 等. 考虑过度自信的交叉持股供应链决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30 (2): 191- 203.
WAN Xiaole , WANG Huanhuan , DU Yuanwei , et al. Study on a cross-shareholding supply chain decision considering over-confidence[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30 (2): 191- 203.
10 REN Da , GUO Rui , LAN Yanfei , et al. Shareholding strategies for selling green products on online platforms in a two-echelon supply chain[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2021, 149, 102261.
doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2021.102261
11 XIA Qiu , ZHI Bangdong , WANG Xiaojun . The role of cross-shareholding in the green supply chain: green contribution, power structure and coordination[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2021, 234, 108037.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108037
12 LEE H H , ZHOU J E , WANG J Q . Trade credit financing under competition and its impact on firm performance in supply chains[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2018, 20 (1): 36- 52.
13 CAO Erbao , DU Lingxia , RUAN Junhu . Financing preferences and performance for an emission-dependent supply chain: supplier vs. bank[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2019, 208, 383- 399.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.001
14 YANG Haoxiong , MIAO Liye , ZHAO Chuan . The credit strategy of a green supply chain based on capital constraints[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 224, 930- 939.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.214
15 QIN J J , HAN Y Q , WEI G M , et al. The value of advance payment financing to carbon emission reduction and production in a supply chain with game theory analysis[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2020, 58 (1): 200- 219.
doi: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1671626
16 ZHANG Z C , XU H Y , CHEN K B . Operational decisions and financing strategies in a capital-constrained closed-loop supply chain[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2021, 59 (15): 4690- 4710.
doi: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1770356
17 李波, 王敏学, 安思敏. 低碳努力下资金约束供应链的融资选择策略研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2021, 35 (2): 211- 220.
LI Bo , WANG Minxue , AN Simin . Research on financing selection strategies in a capital-constrained supply chain under low carbon effort[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2021, 35 (2): 211- 220.
18 张克勇, 李春霞, 姚建明, 等. 零售商采购资金约束下的低碳供应链融资决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30 (8): 108- 116.
ZHANG Keyong , LI Chunxia , YAO Jianming , et al. Research on low carbon supply chain financing decision under the purchase capital constraint of the retailer[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30 (8): 108- 116.
19 孟庆春, 潘建, 王自然, 等. 基于中小供应商低碳融资需求的核心企业统一授信额度配置研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31 (6): 71- 81.
MENG Qingchun , PAN Jian , WANG Zhiran , et al. Research on optimized allocating the unified credit line of focal firm for low-carbon financing of small and medium-sized suppliers[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31 (6): 71- 81.
20 XIA L J , GUO T T , QIN J J , et al. Carbon emission reduction and pricing policies of a supply chain considering reciprocal preferences in cap-and-trade system[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2018, 268 (1): 149- 175.
21 刘鹤, 范莉莉. 碳标签产品"溢价"支付意愿及其影响因素研究[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2018, (5): 123- 126.
LIU H , FAN L . Research on pay willingness and its influencing factors of carbon label products "premium"[J]. Price (Theory & Practice), 2018, (5): 123- 126.
22 XIA T S , WANG Y Y , LV L X , et al. Financing decisions of low-carbon supply chain under chain-to-chain competition[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2023, 61 (18): 6153- 6176.
[1] 李凤,程春龙,郭烨锋. 考虑零售商企业社会责任的低碳供应链政府补贴策略[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(1): 85-99.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 孙小婷1,靳岚2*. DOSY在寡糖混合物分析中的应用[J]. J4, 2013, 48(1): 43 -45 .
[2] 任敏1,2,张光辉1. 右半直线上依分布收敛独立随机环境中随机游动的吸收概率[J]. J4, 2013, 48(1): 93 -99 .
[3] 徐俊峰. 关于复代数微分方程亚纯解的增长级[J]. J4, 2010, 45(6): 91 -93 .
[4] 赵凯, 徐毅,王永刚. Tb定理的必要条件的一个证明[J]. J4, 2010, 45(6): 94 -98 .
[5] 张新东,王秋华 . 避免二阶导数计算的Newton迭代法的一个改进[J]. J4, 2007, 42(7): 72 -76 .
[6] 李慧娟,尹海英,张学成,杨爱芳* . 转蔗糖: 蔗糖-1-果糖基转移酶基因提高烟草的耐旱性[J]. J4, 2007, 42(1): 89 -94 .
[7] 许传轲 陈月辉 赵亚欧. 基于改进伪氨基酸组成的蛋白质相互作用预测[J]. J4, 2009, 44(9): 17 -21 .
[8] 王禄山,高培基,时东霞,张玉忠 . 天然棉纤维表面超微结构及其变化的定量分析[J]. J4, 2006, 41(6): 132 -139 .
[9] 张若军,王林山 . S-分布时滞区间细胞神经网络的全局渐近鲁棒稳定性[J]. J4, 2007, 42(2): 39 -42 .
[10] 唐风琴1,白建明2. 一类带有广义负上限相依索赔额的风险过程大偏差[J]. J4, 2013, 48(1): 100 -106 .
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(理学版)》编辑部　
地址: 山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区（250100）　电话: +86-0531-88366917　E-mail: xblxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发