JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE) ›› 2024, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (4): 117-126.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.0.2023.061

Previous Articles    

Parameters calibration method of JWL equation of state based on time varying response surface methodology

LIANG Xiao1, WANG Shuo1, WANG Ruili2, CHEN Jiangtao3   

  1. 1. School of Mathematics and System Sciences, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, Shandong, China;
    2. Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 100094, China;
    3. China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang 621000, Sichuan, China
  • Published:2024-04-12

Abstract: Calibration of phenomenological parameters of Jones-Wilkins-Lee(JWL)equation of state based on experimental data and modeling and simulation result plays a vital role in comprehension of detonation-driven expansion process and evaluating the work performance of detonation product. Time varying response surface methodology(RSM)can establish a simpler functional relation between prominent parameters and system response quantity(SRQ). It provides a rapid and high-accurate computational method of describing the dynamical behavior and calibrating parameters. Firstly, Latin hypercube sampling(LHS)technique is used to sample the uncertainty in the uncertain parameters of JWL equation of state in the detonation production, and then effective data is selected and divided into two groups. High-resolution simulation is implemented based on group I, and the radial position and radial velocity is obtained through full intellectual software—CFD2D. Time varying RSM between uncertain JWL parameters and SRQ is constructed through output of the high fidelity simulation. Group II is used to evaluate the accuracy of the time varying RSM. Then Residual error between the simulation results of surrogate model and experiment data is constructed. Furthermore, the minimum residual error is searched among all the residual error and the corresponding parameters are obtained as the optimum parameters. The result shows that output of SRQ coincides with and experimental data perfectly, when these optimum parameters are substituted into the high fidelity computational methods. That means, the parameters are calibrated and model validated. The result will provide guidance for weapon design and munitions assessment.

Key words: parameters calibration, Latin hypercube sampling, time varying response surface methodology, cylinder test, JWL equation of state

CLC Number: 

  • O385
[1] 王瑞利,江松. 多物理耦合非线性偏微分方程与数值解不确定度量化数学方法[J]. 中国科学:数学, 2015, 45(6):723-738. WANG Ruili, JIANG Song. Mathematical methods for uncertainty quantification of the nonlinear partial differential equation and numerical solution[J]. Scientia Sinica Mathematica, 2015, 45(6):723-738.
[2] 梁霄,王瑞利. 爆轰敏感性分析与验证CFD模型[J]. 物理学报, 2017, 109:114-121. LIANG Xiao, WANG Ruili. Sensitivity analysis and validation of detonation CFD model[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 109:114-121.
[3] 梁霄,王瑞利. 基于自适应和投影Wiener混沌的圆筒试验不确定度量化[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2019, 39(4):041408. LIANG Xiao, WANG Ruili. Uncertainty quantification of cylindrical test through Wiener chaos with basis adaptation and projection[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2019, 39(4):041408.
[4] FICKETT W, DAVIS D. Detonation Theory and Experiment[M]. Boston: Dover Publications, 1979.
[5] MADER C, FOREST C. Two dimensional homogeneous and heterogeneous detonation wave propagation[J]. Chemical Explosive, 1976, 21:1-17.
[6] 王艳莉,张树道,周海兵,等. 基于不确定度量化分析的炸药驱动飞片参数标定和预测方法[J]. 数值计算与计算机应用, 2017, 38(2):143-154. WANG Yanli, ZHANG Shudao, ZHOU Haibing, et al. A uncertainty parameter calibration and prediction method with an application to flyer plate experiments[J]. Journal on Numerical Methods and Computer Applications, 2017, 38(2):143-154.
[7] 王言金,张树道,李华,等. 炸药爆轰产物Jones-Wilkins-Lee状态方程不确定参数[J]. 物理学报, 2016, 65(10):106401. WANG Yanjin, ZHANG Shudao, LI Hua, et al. Uncertain parameters of Jones-Wilkin-Lee equation of state for detonation products of explosive[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(10):106401.
[8] MORTENSEN C, SOUERS P. Optimizing code calibration of the JWL explosive equation-of-state to the cylinder test[J]. Propellants Explosive Pyrotechnics, 2017, 42(2):616-622.
[9] ANDREWS S, FRASER A. Estimating physics models and quantifying their uncertainty using optimization with a Bayesian objective function[J]. ASME Journal of Verification, Validation, and Uncertainty Quantification, 2019, 4(1):011002.
[10] GARNO J, OUELLET F, BAE S, et al. Calibration of reactive burn and Jones-Wilkins-Lee parameters for simulations of a detonation-driven low experiment with uncertainty quantification[J]. Physical Review Fluids, 2020, 5(12):123201.
[11] LIANG Xiao, WANG Ruili, GHANEM R. Uncertainty quantification of detonation through adapted polynomial chaos[J]. International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, 2020, 10(1):83-100.
[12] 梁霄,陈江涛,王瑞利. 高维参数不确定爆轰的不确定度量化[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 4(4):723-734. LIANG Xiao, CHEN Jiangtao, WANG Ruili. Uncertainty quantification of detonation with high-dimensional parameter uncertainty[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2020, 4(4):723-734.
[13] OBERKAMPF W, ROY C. Verification and validation in scientific computing[M]. Boston: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
[14] JIANG Xiong, HU Xingzhi, LIU Gang, et al. A generalized active subspace for dimension reduction in mixed aleatory-epistemic uncertainty quantification[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 370:113240.
[15] 温丽晶,段卓平,张震宇,等. 采用遗传算法确定炸药爆轰产物JWL状态方程参数[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2013, 33(1):130-134. WEN Lijing, DUAN Zhuoping, ZHANG Zhenyu, et al. Determination of JWL-EOS parameters for explosive detonation products using genetic algorithm[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2013, 33(1):130-134.
[16] TAGUCHI G. Introduction to quality engineering: white plains[M]. New York: Unipub Press, 1987.
[17] BREIG S, LUTI K. Response surface methodology: a review on its applications and challenges in microbial cultures[J]. Material Today: Proceedings, 2021, 42(5):2277-2284.
[18] WANG Ruili, LIANG Xiao, LIN Zhong. LAD2D: a computer code for detonation fluid dynamics problems with large distortion and internal slip[J]. Detection and Diffusion Forum, 2017, 379(3):58-63.
[19] WANG Ruili, LIANG Xiao, LIU Xuezhe. Research on verification and validation strategy of detonation fluid dynamics code of LAD2D[J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2017, 1863(1):030007.
[20] 董海山,周芬芬. 高能炸药及相关物性能[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 1989. DONG Haishan, ZHOU Fenfen. High explosive and its physical property[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1989.
[21] 卢校军,王蓉,黄毅民,等. 两种含铝炸药作功能力与JWL状态方程研究[J]. 含能材料, 2005, 13(3):144-147. LU Jiaojun, WANG Rong, HUANG Yimin, et al. Study on work ability and JWL equation of state of two aluminized explosives[J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2005, 13(3):144-147.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!