您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（理学版）》

《山东大学学报(理学版)》 ›› 2020, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (12): 103-110.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.0.2019.029

• • 上一篇    

分销合同下考虑附加定价的供应链优化问题

陈倩,李严锋*   

  1. 云南经济管理学院, 云南 昆明 650300
  • 发布日期:2020-12-01
  • 作者简介:陈倩(1994— ),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为物流与供应链管理. E-mail:chenqian327yeah@163.com*通信作者简介:李严锋(1963— ),男,博士,教授,研究方向为物流与供应链管理. E-mail:lyf@ynufe.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    云南省哲学社会科学规划重点项目“云南参与西部陆海新通道建设研究”(ZDZZD201904);云南省哲学社会科学教育科学规划项目(AC19013)

Supply chain optimization considering add-on pricing under distribution contract

  1. Yunnan College of Economics and Management, Kunming 650300, Yunnan, China
  • Published:2020-12-01

PDF (PC)

723

摘要： 针对分销合同下附加产品的附加销售或与核心产品的捆绑销售问题,运用消费者效用理论建立需求函数。利用主从对策原理求得不同情形下的均衡解,比较分析出消费者效用最大化时满足供应链成员共赢的条件。结果发现:当线上产品的接受程度低、但核心产品的感知价值较高时,批发价合同下采用“附加+捆绑”定价可以使得公司和线上平台达到共赢;当收益共享因子足够低、但核心产品的感知价值较高,或者收益共享因子较低时,代发货合同下采用“附加+捆绑”定价可以使得公司和线上平台达到共赢。最后,在比较合同时发现,收益共享因子较低时,公司在批发价合同下获利更多,而线上平台在代发货合同下获利更多。

关键词: 供应链管理, 线上平台, 附加定价, 消费者异质, 代发货

Abstract: Aiming at the problem of additional sales of additional products or bundled sales with core products under distribution contract, the demand function is established by using the theory of consumer utility. Using the principle of master-slave strategy, the equilibrium solutions under different situations are obtained, and the win-win conditions of supply chain members are compared and analyzed when the consumer utility maximizes. The results show that: when the acceptance degree of online products is low, but the perceived value of core products is high, the company and online platform can achieve win-win situation by adopting “additional+bundling” pricing under wholesale price contract; when the revenue sharing factor is low enough, but the perceived value of the core product is high, or the revenue sharing factor is low, the company and the online platform can achieve a win-win situation by adopting “additional+bundling” pricing under the consignment contract. Finally, when comparing contracts, we find that when the revenue sharing factor is low, the company gains more under the wholesale price contract, while the online platform gains more under the consignment contract.

Key words: supply chain management, online platform, add-on pricing, consumer heterogeneity, drop-shipping

中图分类号: 

  • F274
[1] ØDEGAARD F, WILSON J G. Dynamic pricing of primary products and ancillary services[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 251(2):586-599.
[2] GENG X, TAN Y, WEI L. How add-on pricing interacts with distribution contracts [J]. Production and Operations Management, 2018, 27(4):605-623.
[3] PARK C. A partial backordering inventory model with a drop-shipping option under purchase dependence[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 34(2):1-16.
[4] ELLISON G. A model of add-on pricing [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2005, 120(2):585-637.
[5] SHULMAN J D, GENG X. Add-on pricing by asymmetric firms [J]. Management Science, 2013, 59(4):899-917.
[6] CUI Y, DUENYAS I, SAHIN O. Unbundling of ancillary service: how does price discrimination of main service matter?[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2018, 20(3):455-466.
[7] TUZOVIC S, SIMPSON M C, KUPPELWIESER V G, et al. From ‘free’ to fee: acceptability of airline ancillary fees and the effects on customer behavior[J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2014, 21(2):98-107.
[8] GENG X J, SHULMAN J D. How costs and heterogeneous consumer price sensitivity interact with add-on pricing[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2015, 24(12):1870-1882.
[9] LIN S. Add-on policies under vertical differentiation: why do luxury hotels charge for internet while economy hotels do not?[J]. Marketing Science, 2017, 36(4):610-625.
[10] NETESSINE S, RUDI N. Supply chain choice on the Internet[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(6):844-864.
[11] ZHAO J S, DUAN Y R, WANG S J, et al. Coordinated drop shipping commitment contract in dual-distribution channel supply chain[J]. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 2012, 10(4):19-30.
[12] CHIANG W K, FENG Y. Retailer or e-tailer? Strategic pricing and economic-lot-size decisions in a competitive supply chain with drop-shipping[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2010, 61(11):1645-1653.
[13] MA S Y, JEMAI Z, SAHIN E, et al. The news-vendor problem with drop-shipping and resalable returns[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2017, 55(22):6547-6571.
[14] YU D Z, CHEONG T, SUN D. Impact of supply chain power and drop-shipping on a manufacturers optimal distribution channel strategy[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 259(2):554-563.
[15] 张光明, 赵士南. 零售商代发货供应链的逆向收益共享契约模型[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2015, 20(1):108-114. ZHANG Guangming, ZHAO Shinan. Research on dual-channel supply chain coordination of drop shipping by the retailer[J]. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2015, 20(1):108-114.
[16] 曹裕, 孟羽, 熊寿遥. 信息不对称下供应商在Drop-shipping供应链中的决策[J]. 系统管理学报, 2016, 25(5):955-964. CAO Yu, MENG Yu, XIONG Shouyao. Suppliers decision under asymmetric information in the drop-shipping supply chain[J]. Journal of Systems & Management, 2016, 25(5):955-964.
[1] 钟丽,辛宁,丁雪峰. 考虑消费者异质的视频平台内容发布策略[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2025, 60(9): 87-98.
[2] 姜亚奇,戴更新,刘晓东,牟宗玉. 规模经济向不经济转换下含网络直销供应链的生产及销售策略[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2022, 57(3): 96-110.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(理学版)》编辑部　
地址: 山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区（250100）　电话: +86-0531-88366917　E-mail: xblxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发