考虑信息平台影响的供应链联合研发策略研究

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.9.2021.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于消费者对信息平台可信度和产品绿色度的认知差异,构建包含零售商和制造商的Stackelberg博弈模型,探究信息平台影响下的供应链绿色产品研发策略,对比分析非联合研发策略和两种联合研发策略的优劣。研究表明:信息平台可信度和产品研发成功率的提高能推动绿色产品研发努力度和各方利润的增加;通过对比不同策略发现,存在收益共享比例的范围,使收益共享策略下的零售商和制造商利润都优于其他策略;尽管信息平台可信度的提高会使收益共享策略的研发努力度和零售商利润提升更快,但对制造商利润和供应链总利润的影响却并不明显。

关键词: 信息平台, 联合研发策略, 供应链, 绿色产品

Abstract: Based on the differences of consumers cognition on the credibility of information platform and product greenness, a Stackelberg game model including a retailer and a manufacturer was built to explore the R&D strategies of green products in supply chain under the influence of information platform, and the advantages and disadvantages of non-joint R&D strategy and two joint R&D strategies were compared and analyzed. The results show that the improvement of the credibility of information platform and the success rate of product R&D can promote the corporate effort and the profit of all parties. By comparing different strategies, it is found that when the revenue sharing ratio is in the middle range, the profit of both retailers and manufacturers under the revenue sharing strategy is better than other strategies. Although the improvement of information platform credibility leads to better manufacturers efforts and retailers profits under revenue sharing strategies, the impact on manufacturers profits and total supply chain profits is not obvious.

Key words: information platform, joint R&, D strategy, supply chain, green product

中图分类号:

C934

孟庆春,于宇,金宗凯,谢磊. 考虑信息平台影响的供应链联合研发策略研究[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2021, 56(10): 149-158.

MENG Qing-chun, YU Yu, JIN Zong-kai, XIE Lei. Research on supply chain joint R&D strategy considering the influence of information platform[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2021, 56(10): 149-158.

参考文献

[1] CHEN L J, XIA D Z, TANG O, et al. Supply chain collaboration for sustainability: a literature review and future research agenda[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2017, 194:73-87.
[2] HONG Z F, GUO X L. Green product supply chain contracts considering environmental responsibilities[J]. Omega, 2019, 83:155-166.
[3] GHOSH D, SHAH J. Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 164:319-329.
[4] 曹裕, 胡韩莉, 李青松. 成本分担契约下绿色供应链的环境标签策略选择研究[J/OL].中国管理科学:1-13[2021-01-14]. CAO Yu, HU Hanli, LI Qingsong. Research on environmental labeling strategy selection of green supply chain under cost sharing contract[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Management Science: 1-13[2021-01-14].
[5] 曹裕, 刘子豪.无政府激励的绿色供应链管理的可行性分析[J]. 管理工程学报, 2017, 31(2):119-127. CAO Yu, LIU Zihao. A feasibility analysis for practicing green supply chain management without government policy incentives[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2017, 31(2):119-127.
[6] ZHANG J X, LIU G W, ZHANG Q, et al. Coordinating a supply chain for deteriorating items with a revenue sharing and cooperative investment contract[J]. Omega, 2015, 56:37-49.
[7] 郭军华, 孙林洋, 张诚, 等. 碳税政策下考虑消费者低碳偏好的供应链定价与协调[J]. 系统工程, 2020,38(6):61-69. GUO Junhua, SUN Linyang, ZHANG Cheng, et al. Pricing and coordinating of supply chains considering the low-carbon preference of consumers under the carbon tax policy[J]. Systems Engineering, 2020, 38(6):61-69.
[8] 周艳菊, 胡凤英, 周正龙. 零售商主导下促进绿色产品需求的联合研发契约协调研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2020, 34(2):194-204. ZHOU Yanju, HU Fengying, ZHOU Zhenglong. Study on joint contract coordination to promote green product demand under the retailer-dominance[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2020, 34(2):194-204.
[9] 王一雷, 朱庆华, 夏西强. 基于消费偏好的供应链上下游联合减排协调契约博弈模型[J]. 系统工程学报, 2017,32(2):188-198. WANG Yilei, ZHU Qinghua, XIA Xiqiang. Supply chain upstream and downstream joint coordination contract game model based on consumer preference[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2017, 32(2):188-198.
[10] YU X N, LAN Y F, ZHAO R Q. Strategic green technology innovation in a two-stage alliance: vertical collaboration or co-development?[J]. Omega, 2021, 98:102116.
[11] KWARK Y, CHEN J Q, RAGHUNATHAN S. Online product reviews: implications for retailers and competing manufacturers[J]. Information Systems Research, 2014, 25(1):93-110.
[12] 崔芳, 崔文田, 林军, 等. 基于在线评论的新产品定向市场播种最优策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(11):15-25. CUI Fang, CUI Wentian, LIN Jun, et al. Optimal targeted seeding strategy for a new product based on online ratings[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2017, 26(11):15-25.
[13] 李余辉, 倪得兵, 唐小我. 基于企业社会责任的供应链企业质量信号传递博弈[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(7):38-47. LI Yuhui, NI Debing, TANG Xiaowo. Signaling quality in supply chains by corporate social responsibility[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(7):38-47.
[14] ZHAO Y, YANG S, NARAYAN V, et al. Modeling consumer learning from online product reviews[J]. Marketing Science, 2013, 32(1):153-169.
[15] 孙瑾, 郑雨, 陈静. 感知在线评论可信度对消费者信任的影响研究: 不确定性规避的调节作用[J]. 管理评论, 2020,32(4):146-159. SUN Jin, ZHENG Yu, CHEN Jing. The influence of credibility of online reviews on consumerstrust: the moderating role of uncertainty[J]. Management Review, 2020, 32(4):146-159.
[16] 董晓红, 刘征驰. 消费者搜寻、服务质量与B2C平台竞争优势[J]. 管理现代化, 2016, 36(3):90-92,125. DONG Xiaohong, LIU Zhengchi. Consumer search, service quality and B2C platform competitive advantage[J]. Modernization of Management, 2016, 36(3):90-92,125.
[17] 卢丽玲. 基于消费者偏好的信息公开和供应商选择研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2018. LU Liling. Study on information disclosure and supplier selection strategies under the consideration of consumer responsible preferences[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2018.
[18] KRAFT T, ZHENG Y C, ERHUN F. The NGOs dilemma: how to influence firms to replace a potentially hazardous substance[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2013, 15(4):649-669.
[19] KARAER Ö, KRAFT T, KHAWAM J. Buyer and nonprofit levers to improve supplier environmental performance[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2017, 26(6):1163-1190.
[20] KIM S H. Time to come clean? Disclosure and inspection policies for green production[J]. Operations Research, 2015, 63(1):1-20.
[21] CHEN S, ZHANG Q Q, ZHOU Y P. Impact of supply chain transparency on sustainability under NGO scrutiny[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2019, 28(12):3002-3022.

相关文章 15

[1]	柏庆国,刘世豪,张颖,徐健腾. 全渠道零售下二级闭环供应链的回收模式选择与减排策略[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2025, 60(6): 18-30.
[2]	任廷海,刘开璇,王大飞,曾能民. 考虑渠道入侵与售前服务质量影响销量的软件竞争与服务合作绩效Symbol`@@[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2025, 60(6): 114-127.
[3]	王晶,葛彤彤,司凤山. 考虑碳减排和双向公平关切的供应链复杂性研究[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2025, 60(6): 31-44.
[4]	刘名武,樊宝丹,邹梓琛. 碳税政策下制造商碳标签选择策略[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2025, 60(6): 89-102.
[5]	郭婷婷,李娜. 规模不经济下考虑企业社会责任投入的闭环供应链回收渠道选择[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(9): 42-55.
[6]	李玲,王云博,李雅婷. 考虑品牌溢出效应的平台供应链分销策略[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(9): 9-17.
[7]	刘名武,郭玲,颜玥,杜烁铭. 关税和本土认同下两竞争供应链定价及利润弹性[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(9): 18-32.
[8]	税文兵,周东民,郭绍梅. 考虑产品质量和双边服务水平的线上线下竞合供应链协调[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(9): 33-41, 55.
[9]	王玉燕,孙煜林,林飞. 资金约束和交叉持股下低碳供应链的融资决策[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(9): 64-78.
[10]	朱一,刘振威. 消费者购买后悔的创新耐用产品供应链微分博弈[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(9): 56-63.
[11]	苏宁宁,何新华,胡文发. 绿色营销资金受限的供应链融资策略[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(11): 126-138.
[12]	肖敏,张晓典,何新华. 公平关切下混销模式的E-供应链效率和公平度动态演进[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(1): 72-84.
[13]	李凤,程春龙,郭烨锋. 考虑零售商企业社会责任的低碳供应链政府补贴策略[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(1): 85-99.
[14]	史聪,张桂涛,张萧,林帅成. 碳配额与交易监管下基于区块链技术的平台供应链网络运营决策[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(1): 100-114, 123.
[15]	温艳,于溪源,胡劲松. 竞争型医药供应链研发创新策略及行为选择[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2023, 58(7): 18-31.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed