您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(理学版)》

《山东大学学报(理学版)》 ›› 2026, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (10): 87-97.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.0.2026.022

• 人地系统与生态服务 • 上一篇    

湿地生态系统服务价值评估——以小孩儿口为例

周泽平1,于政达1,黄红梅2,罗秀明3,郭玉3,苗杰2*   

  1. 1.青岛大学环境与地理科学学院, 山东 青岛 266100;2.烟台市森林资源监测保护服务中心, 山东 烟台 264001;3.山东汇杰地信科技有限公司, 山东 烟台 264100
  • 发布日期:2026-10-16
  • 通讯作者: 苗杰(1986— ),男,高级工程师,研究方向为林业资源调查监测. E-mail:ytlymj@163.com
  • 作者简介:周泽平(2002— ),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为资源与环境. E-mail:15564622207@163.com*通信作者:苗杰(1986— ),男,高级工程师,研究方向为林业资源调查监测. E-mail:ytlymj@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    山东省自然科学基金面上项目(ZR2024MC181,ZR2024MD010);2024年度省级黄河流域生态保护修复资金资助项目(SDGP370687000202402000150)

Assessment of wetland ecosystem service value: a case study of Xiaohaierkou

ZHOU Zeping1, YU Zhengda1, HUANG Hongmei2, LUO Xiuming3, GUO Yu3, MIAO Jie2 *   

  1. 1. School of Environment and Geography, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266100, Shandong, China;
    2. Yantai Forest Resources Monitoring and Protection Service Center, Yantai 264001, Shandong, China;
    3. Shandong Huijie Geospatial Technology Company Limited, Yantai 264100, Shandong, China
  • Published:2026-10-16

摘要: 湿地生态系统服务价值评估对于科学量化其生态功能、优化资源管理和保护政策等方面具有重要作用。本研究通过采用市场价值法、替代成本法、污染物削减价值法和旅行成本法等多种评估方法,对小孩儿口湿地生态系统的供给服务、调节服务和社会服务三大类共13项生态系统服务功能进行定量评估。结果表明,小孩儿口湿地生态系统年综合服务价值约为3.74亿元,其中调节服务占比最高,约为81.3%。水质净化、气候调节及供水蓄水等功能在维护区域生态安全、改善居民生活环境方面发挥关键作用。供给服务约占5.8%,主要包括水产品生产和植物资源供给,体现了湿地较为稳定的生态生产能力;社会服务约占12.9%,在游憩旅游、科普教育、文化传播以及促进公众身心健康等方面具有显著的社会价值,充分彰显了城市湿地在公共服务供给和生态文明建设中的综合效益。研究进一步指出,未来可通过实施精细化水文调控、加强植被养护及功能区管理等措施,持续提升湿地的生态调节能力和社会服务水平。本研究不仅系统量化了小孩儿口湿地各类生态系统服务功能的价值,也为城市湿地的保护管理、精细化调控及生态价值实现提供科学依据。

关键词: 小孩儿口湿地公园, 生态系统服务价值, 城市湿地, 河口

Abstract: Wetland ecosystem service valuation is essential for quantitatively assessing ecological functions and informing better resource management and conservation policies. In this study, a combination of valuation methods, including the market value method, replacement cost method, pollutant reduction value method, and travel cost method, was used to assess 13 ecosystem service functions of the Xiaohaierkou wetland across three broad categories: provisioning, regulating, and social services. The results showed that the wetland provides an annual total ecosystem service value of approximately CNY 374 million, with regulating services contributing the largest share at about 81.3%. Among these, water purification, climate regulation, and water storage and supply were particularly important in supporting regional ecological security and improving local living conditions. Provisioning services accounted for about 5.8% of the total value, mainly through aquatic product production and plant resource supply, indicating the wetlands relatively stable productive capacity. Social services contributed about 12.9%, reflecting substantial value in recreation and tourism, science education, cultural communication, and the promotion of public physical and mental well-being. These findings highlight the broad benefits of urban wetlands in public service provision and ecological civilization development. The study further suggests that the wetland regulating capacity and social service functions could be enhanced through refined hydrological management, stronger vegetation maintenance, and improved functional zoning. Overall, this research not only provides a systematic valuation of the ecosystem services supplied by the Xiaohaierkou wetland, but also offers a scientific basis for its conservation, adaptive management, and the realization of its ecological value.

Key words: Xiaohaierkou wetland park, ecosystem service valuation, urban wetlands, estuary

中图分类号: 

  • X826
[1] Costanza R, Kubiszewski I, Ervin D, et al. Valuing ecological systems and services[J]. F1000 Biology Reports, 2011, 3: 14.
[2] Kumar P. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations[M]. London: Routledge, 2012: 456.
[3] Costanza R, D'arge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of the worlds ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387(6630): 253-260.
[4] Adawi S H, Romdhane M S, Hmida L. Wetland ecosystems: ecological functioning and value-a case study of the wadi qana protected area, Palestinian authority[J]. Wetlands, 2025, 45(7): 92.
[5] Meng L R, Dong J H. LUCC and ecosystem service value assessment for wetlands: a case study in Nansi Lake, China[J]. Water, 2019, 11(8): 1597.
[6] Shah A M, Liu G Y, Chen Y, et al. Urban constructed wetlands: assessing ecosystem services and disservices for safe, resilient, and sustainable cities[J]. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 2023, 10(4): 582-596.
[7] 赵晨羽, 赵思劼, 姜妮, 等. 基于生态服务价值核算的滇池环湖湿地综合效能评估[J]. 环境科学研究, 2024, 37(5): 1071-1079. Zhao Chenyu, Zhao Sijie, Jiang Ni, et al. Comprehensive benefit evaluation of wetlands around Dianchi Lake based on ecological service value accounting[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2024, 37(5): 1071-1079.
[8] Guruge T P S R, Abeysiriwardana P C, Kuruppu I V, et al. Valuing urban wetlands for sustainable land use: recreational services and economic insights from a travel cost framework[J]. Urban Ecosystems, 2025, 28(4): 166.
[9] 马桥, 刘康, 高艳, 等. 基于SolVES模型的西安浐灞国家湿地公园生态系统服务社会价值评估[J]. 湿地科学, 2018, 16(1): 51-58. Ma Qiao, Liu Kang, Gao Yan, et al. Assessment on social values of ecosystem services in Xi'an Chanba national wetland park based on SolVES model[J]. Wetland Science, 2018, 16(1): 51-58.
[10] 王晶懋, 冯洪晶, 张涛, 等. 基于生物多样性的低碳街区绿地碳汇效益与生态系统服务价值量化研究[J]. 生态学报, 2025, 45(23): 11428-11441. Wang Jingmao, Feng Hongjing, Zhang Tao, et al. Biodiversity-based quantification of carbon sink benefits and ecosystem service values of green spaces in low-carbon block[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2025, 45(23): 11428-11441.
[11] 海阳市政府. 海阳统计年鉴[EB/OL].(2024-12-30)[2025-12-18]. https://www.haiyang.gov.cn/art/2025/12/30/art_48835_2947766.html. Haiyang government. Haiyang statistical yearbook[EB/OL].(2024-12-30)[2025-12-18]. https://www.haiyang.gov.cn/art/2025/12/30/art-48835-2947766.html.
[12] HJ 192—2015生态环境状况评价技术规范[S]. HJ 192—2015 Technical Criterion for Ecosystem Status Evaluation[S].
[13] 林湿规〔2022〕3号国家城市湿地公园管理办法[S]. Linshigui [2022] No. 3 Administrative measures for national urban wetland park[S].
[14] 张翼然, 周德民, 刘苗. 中国内陆湿地生态系统服务价值评估: 以71个湿地案例点为数据源[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(13): 4279-4286. Zhang Yiran, Zhou Demin, Liu Miao. Ecosystem service valuation research of Chinese inland wetlands based on case study[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(13): 4279-4286.
[15] Mohan M T, Mohan M. Valuation of wetland ecosystem services[M] //Ecosystem Services Valuation for Sustainable Development. Singapore: Springer, 2024: 19-31.
[16] Huang X J, He J R, Zhang Q F, et al. Evaluating wetland ecosystem services value and dominant functions: insights from the Pearl River Delta[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, 371: 123069.
[17] 王斌, 杨校生, 张彪, 等. 浙江省滨海湿地生态系统服务及其价值研究[J]. 湿地科学, 2012, 10(1): 15-22. Wang Bin, Yang Xiaosheng, Zhang Biao, et al. Assessment of ecosystem services and value of coastal wetlands in Zhejiang Province[J]. Wetland Science, 2012, 10(1): 15-22.
[18] 崔丽娟, 庞丙亮, 李伟, 等. 扎龙湿地生态系统服务价值评价[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(3): 828-836. Cui Lijuan, Pang Bingliang, Li Wei, et al. Evaluation of ecosystem services in the Zhalong Wetland[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(3): 828-836.
[19] Deng O, Li Y Q, Li R S, et al. Estimation of forest ecosystem climate regulation service based on actual evapotranspiration of new urban areas in Guanshanhu District, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, China[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(16): 10022.
[20] 江波, 欧阳志云, 苗鸿, 等. 海河流域湿地生态系统服务功能价值评价[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(8): 2236-2244. Jiang Bo, Ouyang Zhiyun, Miao Hong, et al. Ecosystem services valuation of the Haihe River Basin Wetlands[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(8): 2236-2244.
[21] 何洋, 汪少华, 杨婷. 环洞庭湖森林生态系统固碳释氧与土壤保育价值评估: 以常德市为例[J]. 世界生态学, 2023, 12(4): 413-422. He Yang, Wang Shaohua, Yang Ting. Evaluation of carbon sequestration, oxygen release and soil conservation value of forest ecosystem around Dongting Lake: taking Changde City as an example[J]. International Journal of Ecology, 2023, 12(4): 413-422.
[22] 刘润, 王兵, 牛香. 湿地生态系统服务功能的空间格局: 以内蒙古森工湿地生态系统为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021, 41(2): 37-45. Liu Run, Wang Bing, Niu Xiang. Spatial pattern of wetland ecosystem service function:a case study on forestry industry wetland ecosystem in Inner Mongolia autonomous region[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 41(2): 37-45.
[23] Rusciano V, Ruberto M, Baralla S, et al. Assessing the touristic activities of wetlands through the travel cost method: a case study[J]. Water, 2023, 15(23): 4146.
[24] Kang N N, Hou L L, Huang J K, et al. Ecosystem services valuation in China: a meta-analysis[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 809: 151122.
[25] Ouyang Z Y, Song C S, Zheng H, et al. Using gross ecosystem product(GEP)to value nature in decision making[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020, 117(25): 14593-14601.
[26] Reid W V, Mooney H A, Cropper A, et al. Millennium ecosystem assessment: ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis[M]. Washington DC: Island Press, 2005: 85-88.
[27] Eggelston S, Buendia L, Miwa K. 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories[R]. Hayama, Kanagawa: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, 2006: 6-8.
[28] Wu Y F, Zhang G X, Rousseau A N, et al. On how wetlands can provide flood resilience in a large river basin: a case study in Nenjiang River Basin, China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 587: 125012.
[29] Shravani M, Banerjee R, Pallavi N. Natural & constructed wetland: a review on water purification and ecosystem services[J]. Journal of Materials and Environmental Science, 2025, 16(7): 1245.
[30] 邹萍秀, 高子炜, 曹磊, 等. 基于生境适宜性的天津市湿地水鸟生态安全格局构建与优化[J]. 湿地科学, 2024, 22(6): 884-894. Zou Pingxiu, Gao Ziwei, Cao Lei, et al. Construction and optimization of ecological security pattern for waterbirds in Tianjin wetland based on habitat suitability[J]. Wetland Science, 2024, 22(6): 884-894.
[31] Sun R H, Chen A L, Chen L D, et al. Cooling effects of wetlands in an urban region: the case of Beijing[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2012, 20: 57-64.
[32] Zhang S F, Cheng Z J, Liang W F, et al. For the better protection of wetland resources: net value of ecosystem services after protective development of Xixi Wetland in Hangzhou, China[J]. Sustainability, 2023, 15(7): 5913.
[33] 谢慧莹, 郭程轩. 广州海珠湿地生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 热带地貌, 2018, 39(1): 26-33. Xie Huiying, Guo Chengxuan. Evaluation of Haizhu Wetland ecosystem service value in Guangzhou[J]. Tropical Geomorphology, 2018, 39(1): 26-33.
[34] 张素珍, 李晓粤, 李贵宝. 湿地生态系统服务功能及价值评估[J]. 水土保持研究, 2005, 12(6): 125-128. Zhang Suzhen, Li Xiaoyue, Li Guibao. The wetland ecosystem service function and value estimation[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2005, 12(6): 125-128.
[35] 谢高地, 甄霖, 鲁春霞, 等. 一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2008, 23(5): 911-919. Xie Gaodi, Zhen Lin, Lu Chunxia, et al. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008, 23(5): 911-919.
[36] Zhang Y J, Zhang X L, Fang W, et al. Carbon sequestration potential of wetlands and regulating strategies response to climate change[J]. Environmental Research, 2025, 269: 120890.
[37] Lin X W, Wu X D, Gao Z N, et al. The effects of water depth on the growth of two emergent plants in an in-situ experiment[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(18): 11309.
[38] An Y, Wang L, Zhang M Y, et al. Plant functional traits and community characteristics jointly shape soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus storage in passively restored wetlands following agricultural abandonment[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2025, 18(5): rtaf084.
[39] Carter M. Wetlands and health: how do urban wetlands contribute to community wellbeing?[M] //Wetlands and Human Health. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015: 149-167.
[40] 周文昌, 史玉虎, 潘磊, 等. 2017年武汉东湖湿地生态系统最终服务价值评估[J]. 湿地科学, 2019, 17(3): 318-323. Zhou Wenchang, Shi Yuhu, Pan Lei, et al. Evaluation of final service value of Donghu Lake wetland ecosystem in Wuhan City in 2017[J]. Wetland Science, 2019, 17(3): 318-323.
[41] 商慧敏, 郗敏, 李悦, 等. 胶州湾滨海湿地生态系统服务价值变化[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(2): 421-431. Shang Huimin, Xi Min, Li Yue, et al. Evaluation of changes in the ecosystem services of Jiaozhou Bay coastal wetland[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(2): 421-431.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!