您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(理学版)》

《山东大学学报(理学版)》 ›› 2023, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (11): 1-14,26.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.0.2022.265

•   •    下一篇

基于Stackelberg博弈的最优再保险合同设计

杨鹏1(),张晓燕2   

  1. 1. 西安财经大学数学学院, 陕西 西安 710100
    2. 西安长峰机电研究所, 陕西 西安 710065
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-29 出版日期:2023-11-20 发布日期:2023-11-07
  • 作者简介:杨鹏(1983—), 男, 副教授, 博士, 研究方向为再保险和风险管理. E-mail: pyang@xaufe.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究西部和边疆地区项目(21XJC910001);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划资助项目(2023-JC-YB-002)

Optimal reinsurance contract design based on Stackelberg game

Peng YANG1(),Xiaoyan ZHANG2   

  1. 1. School of Mathematics, Xi'an University of Finance and Economics, Xi'an 710100, Shaanxi, China
    2. Xi'an Changfeng Research Institute of Mechanism and Electricity, Xi'an 710065, Shaanxi, China
  • Received:2022-04-29 Online:2023-11-20 Published:2023-11-07

摘要:

针对再保险合同设计问题, 即再保费的定价问题, 假设市场上有1家保险公司和1家再保险公司,其中, 保险公司从事2类保险业务, 再保险公司从事1类保险业务。为了体现保险公司与再保险公司之间的竞争, 假设3类保险业务具有相依性, 且允许保险公司从事再保险业务。利用相对业绩, 量化保险公司与再保险公司之间的竞争。保险公司和再保险公司的目标都是寻找最优的再保险合同, 最大化它们终端财富的均值同时最小化其方差。在Stackelberg博弈框架下, 通过使用随机分析和随机控制理论, 求得最优再保险合同和值函数的显式解。最终, 通过数值实验分析模型参数对最优再保险合同的影响, 比较一些特殊情形与一般情形的关系。

关键词: 再保险合同, 再保费, 保险业务相依, 相对业绩, Stackelberg博弈

Abstract:

For the optimal reinsurance contract design problem, that is, the reinsurance premium pricing problem, we assume that there is an insurance company and a reinsurance company on the market. Among them, the insurance company is engaged in two types of insurance business, and the reinsurance company is engaged in one type of insurance business. To reflect the competition between the insurance company and the reinsurance company, we assume that these three insurance businesses are interdependent, and the insurance company can engage in the reinsurance business. Using the relative performance, the competition between the insurance company and the reinsurance company is quantified. The aims of the insurance company and the reinsurance company are to find an optimal reinsurance contract to maximize the mean of the terminal wealth and minimize the variance of the terminal wealth. Under the Stackelberg game framework, by using stochastic calculus and stochastic control theory, the explicit solutions for the optimal reinsurance contract and the optimal value function are obtained. Finally, the influence of model parameters on the optimal reinsurance contract is analyzed through numerical experiments and the relationship between some special cases and general cases is compared.

Key words: reinsurance contract, reinsurance premium, insurance business dependence, relative performance, Stackelberg game

中图分类号: 

  • O211.6

图1

再保险公司是否从事保险业务和τ1对最优再保险合同的影响"

图2

再保险公司是否从事保险业务和τ2对最优再保险合同的影响"

图3

再保险公司是否从事保险业务和λ对最优再保险合同的影响"

图4

是否考虑保险业务之间的相依性和λ对最优再保险合同的影响"

图5

保险公司是否考虑竞争和λ对最优再保险合同的影响"

1 RONG Ximin , YAN Yiqi , ZHAO Hui . Asymptotic solution of optimal reinsurance and investment problem with correlation risk for an insurer under the CEV model[J]. International Journal of Control, 2023, 96 (4): 840- 853.
doi: 10.1080/00207179.2021.2015627
2 ZHANG Yan , ZHAO Peibiao , TENG Xinghua , et al. Optimal reinsurance and investment strategies for an insurer and a reinsurer under Hestons SV model: HARA utility and Legendre transform[J]. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (4): 2139- 2159.
doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020062
3 CHEN Zhiping , YANG Peng . Robust optimal reinsurance-investment strategy with price jumps and correlated claims[J]. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2020, 92, 27- 46.
doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.03.001
4 LI Zhongfei , ZENG Yan , LAI Yongzeng . Optimal time-consistent investment and reinsurance strategies for insurers under Heston's SV models[J]. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2012, 51 (1): 191- 203.
doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2011.09.002
5 YANG Peng , CHEN Zhiping , WANG Liyuan . Time-consistent reinsurance and investment strategy combining quota-share and excess of loss for mean-variance insurers with jump-diffusion price process[J]. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 2021, 50 (11): 2546- 2568.
doi: 10.1080/03610926.2019.1670849
6 LIN Xiang , QIAN Yiping . Time-consistent mean-variance reinsurance-investment strategy for insurers under CEV model[J]. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2016, 2016 (7): 646- 671.
doi: 10.1080/03461238.2015.1048710
7 YU Wenguang , GUO Peng , WANG Qi , et al. On a periodic capital injection and barrier dividend strategy in the compound Poisson risk model[J]. Mathematics, 2020, 8 (4): 511.
doi: 10.3390/math8040511
8 EISENBERG J , MISHURA Y . Optimising dividends and consumption under an exponential CIR as a discount factor[J]. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 2020, 92, 285- 309.
doi: 10.1007/s00186-020-00714-w
9 HAN X , LIANG Z B , YOUNG V R . Optimal reinsurance to minimize the probability of drawdown under the mean-variance premium principle[J]. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2020, 2020 (10): 879- 903.
doi: 10.1080/03461238.2020.1788136
10 LUESAMAI A . Lower and upper bounds of the ultimate ruin probability in a discrete time risk model with proportional reinsurance and investment[J]. The Journal of Risk Management and Insurance, 2021, 25 (1): 1- 10.
11 YUAN Yu , LIANG Zhibin , HAN Xia . Optimal investment and reinsurance to minimize the probability of drawdown with borrowing costs[J]. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2022, 18 (2): 933- 967.
doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021003
12 PERCY D F , WARNER D B . Evaluating relative performances in disabled sports competitions[J]. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 2009, 20, 185- 199.
13 DE MARZO P M , KANIEL R , KREMER I . Relative wealth concerns and financial bubbles[J]. The Review of Financial and Studies, 2008, 21 (1): 19- 50.
doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhm032
14 DENG Chao , ZENG Xudong , ZHU Huiming . Non-zero-sum stochastic differential reinsurance and investment games with default risk[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, 264 (3): 1144- 1158.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.06.065
15 PUN C S , SIU C C , WONG H Y . Non-zero-sum reinsurance games subject to ambiguous correlations[J]. Operations Research Letters, 2016, 44 (5): 578- 586.
doi: 10.1016/j.orl.2016.06.004
16 HU Duni , WANG Hailong . Time-consistent investment and reinsurance under relative performance concerns[J]. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 2018, 47 (7): 1693- 1717.
doi: 10.1080/03610926.2017.1324987
17 CHEN Shumin , YANG Hailiang , ZENG Yan . Stochastic differential games between two insurers with generalized mean-variance premium principle[J]. ASTIN Bulletin, 2018, 48 (1): 413- 434.
doi: 10.1017/asb.2017.35
18 WANG Ning , ZHANG Nan , JIN Zhuo , et al. Stochastic differential investment and reinsurance games with nonlinear risk processes and VaR constraints[J]. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 2021, 96, 168- 184.
doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.11.004
19 GU Ailing , CHEN Shumin , LI Zhongfei , et al. Optimal reinsurance pricing with ambiguity aversion and relative performance concerns in the principal-agent model[J]. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2022, 2022 (9): 749- 774.
doi: 10.1080/03461238.2022.2026459
20 YANG Peng , CHEN Zhiping . Optimal reinsurance pricing, risk sharing and investment strategies in a joint reinsurer-insurer framework[J]. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 2022, 34 (4): 661- 694.
21 BÄUERLE N . Benchmark and mean-variance problems for insurers[J]. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 2005, 62 (1): 159- 165.
doi: 10.1007/s00186-005-0446-1
22 BJÖRK T , MURGOCI A . A general theory of Markovian time inconsistent stochastic control problems[J]. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2010, 1, 55.
23 YANG Peng , CHEN Zhiping , XU Ying . Time-consistent equilibrium reinsurance-investment strategy for n competitive insurers under a new interaction mechanism and a general investment framework[J]. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2020, 374, 112769.
doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2020.112769
[1] 周驰,王艺馨,于静. 批发,代理还是混合?——与自营平台竞争的复合平台销售模式选择策略[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2023, 58(1): 89-100.
[2] 肖敏,余敏,何新华. 引入垂直电商的供应链渠道定价策略[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2019, 54(3): 110-118.
[3] 程茜,汪传旭,徐朗. 考虑利他偏好的低碳供应链决策[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2018, 53(5): 41-52.
[4] 张克勇1,吴燕1,侯世旺2. 零售商公平关切下闭环供应链定价策略研究[J]. J4, 2013, 48(05): 83-91.
[5] 陆媛媛, . 基于渠道不对称的多品牌代理零售商的应对策略研究[J]. J4, 2008, 43(8): 19-23 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 马统一1,2,刘春燕2. Lp-混合投影体的Shephard问题与Minkowski-Funk变换[J]. J4, 2012, 47(10): 21 -30 .
[2] 孙林, 郑煜, 姚娟. 不确定离散奇异系统的鲁棒非脆弱H状态反馈控制[J]. J4, 2011, 46(1): 35 -41 .
[3] . 具有AR(2)误差非线性回归模型的联合检验[J]. J4, 2009, 44(7): 38 -43 .
[4] 秦兆宇,刘师莲*,杨银荣,刘芙君,李建远,宋春华 . 白斑综合征中国对虾肝胰腺蛋白质组学研究的技术探索[J]. J4, 2007, 42(7): 5 -08 .
[5] 伍代勇. 一类具有反馈控制非线性离散Logistic模型的全局吸引性[J]. J4, 2013, 48(4): 114 -110 .
[6] 刘 华,刘志广,苏 敏,李自珍, . 聚集效应对宿主—寄生物种群模型动态行为的影响[J]. J4, 2008, 43(8): 31 -34 .
[7] 宋霞1,2,刘保东1*,张全信2. 一类二阶非线性摄动微分方程解的渐近性质[J]. J4, 2009, 44(2): 19 -23 .
[8] 张方国. 椭圆曲线在密码中的应用:过去,现在,将来…[J]. J4, 2013, 48(05): 1 -13 .
[9] 高莉莉,马 霞,赵宏飞,裴家伟,吕兆林,张柏林* . 弱化H+-ATPase的德氏乳杆菌乳酸亚种的生理特性研究[J]. J4, 2008, 43(7): 1 -09 .
[10] 于文广1,黄玉娟2. 干扰条件下变破产下限多元风险模型的破产概率[J]. J4, 2011, 46(3): 58 -62 .