您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(理学版)》

《山东大学学报(理学版)》 ›› 2026, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (9): 108-122.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.0.2025.133

• • 上一篇    

异方差序列下持久性变点的稳健检验

宋家乐1,金浩2,杨云锋1   

  1. 1.西安科技大学理学院, 陕西 西安 710054;2.西安科技大学计算机科学与技术学院, 陕西 西安 710054
  • 发布日期:2026-09-30
  • 通讯作者: 金浩(1980— ),男,教授,博士,研究方向为时间序列分析. E-mail:jinhao_2004@126.com
  • 作者简介:宋家乐(1999— ),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为时间序列分析. E-mail:sjl8882@163.com*通信作者:金浩(1980— ),男,教授,博士,研究方向为时间序列分析. E-mail:jinhao_2004@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省科技厅自然科学基金资助项目(2020JM513)

Robust detection of persistence change point in heteroscedastic sequences

SONG Jiale1, JIN Hao2, YANG Yunfeng1   

  1. 1. School of Science, Xian University of Science and Technology, Xian 710054, Shaanxi, China;
    2. School of Computer Science and Technology, Xian University of Science and Technology, Xian 710054, Shaanxi, China
  • Published:2026-09-30

摘要: 在强混合异方差序列的持久性变点检验中,为克服异方差性所导致的最小二乘估计偏差,提出基于最小绝对偏差(least absolute deviation, LAD)估计的比值型检验统计量。在理论上不仅可以避免对长期方差的一致估计,也无须对方差函数进行假设和估计。在一定假设条件下,推导出统计量在原假设下的极限分布,并证明其在备择假设下的一致性。数值模拟结果表明,基于LAD估计的比值型检验具有良好的经验水平,且与最小二乘估计相比,其经验势也表现出较强的稳健性。最后通过一组股价数据,进一步验证本文所提方法的有效性和可行性。

关键词: 持久性变点, 异方差序列, 比值型检验, 最小绝对偏差估计

Abstract: In persistence change-point testing for strongly mixing heteroscedastic sequences, a ratio-based test statistic using least absolute deviation(LAD)estimation is proposed to address the bias in least squares estimation caused by heteroscedasticity. Theoretically, this approach not only avoids the necessity for consistent estimation of long-term variance but also eliminates the need for assumptions or estimation of the variance function. Under some certain conditions, the limit distribution of the statistic under the null hypothesis is derived, and its consistency is proven under the alternative. Numerical simulation indicates that the Ratio-type test based on LAD estimation exhibits good empirical size, and the empirical power also demonstrates satisfactory robustness compared with the least squares estimation. Finally, a set of stock price data are used to further validate the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed method.

Key words: persistence change, heteroscedastic sequence, ratio-type test, least absolute deviation estimation

中图分类号: 

  • O211
[1] Chen Zhanshou, Tian Zheng, Zhao Chunhui. Monitoring persistence change in infinite variance observations[J]. Journal of the Korean Statistical Society, 2012, 41(1): 61-73.
[2] 陈占寿, 田铮. 含趋势项时间序列持久性变点监测[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2014, 34(4): 936-943. Chen Zhanshou, Tian Zheng. Monitoring change in persistence in time series with trend[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2014, 34(4): 936-943.
[3] De Long J B, Summers L H, Mankiw N G, et al. How does macroeconomic policy affect output?[J]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1988, 1988(2): 433-494.
[4] Hakkio C S, Rush M. Is the budget deficit “too large?”[J]. Economic Inquiry, 2010, 29(3): 429-445.
[5] Kim J. Detection of change in persistence of a linear time series[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2000, 95(1): 97-116.
[6] Busetti F, Taylor A M R. Tests of stationarity against a change in persistence[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2004, 123(1): 33-66.
[7] Leybourne S J, Kim T H, Taylor A M R. Regression-based tests for a change in persistence[J]. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 2006, 68(5): 595-621.
[8] Cavaliere G. Unit root tests under time-varying variances[J]. Econometric Reviews, 2005, 23(3): 259-292.
[9] Cavaliere G, Taylor A. Testing for unit roots in time series models with non-stationary volatility[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2007, 140(2): 919-947.
[10] White H. Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models[J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1982, 50(1): 1-25.
[11] Andrews D W K. Tests for parameter instability and structural change with unknown change point[J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1993, 61(4): 821-856.
[12] De Jong R M, Amsler C, Schmidt P. A robust version of the KPSS test based on indicators[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2007, 137(2): 311-333.
[13] Wang Kai, Zhu Yanling. M-estimation in high-dimensional linear model[J]. Journal of Inequalities and Applications, 2018, 2018(1): 1-13.
[14] 白学. 基于M估计的厚尾序列持久性变点检验[D]. 西安: 西安科技大学, 2023: 13-37. Bai Xue. Persistence change point test for heavy-tailed sequences based on M-estimation[D]. Xian: Xian University of Science and Technology, 2023: 13-37.
[15] 朱玲, 乔宝明, 金浩. 基于M估计强混合重尾序列结构变点的鲁棒检验[J]. 统计与决策, 2024, 40(8): 34-40. Zhu Ling, Qiao Baoming, Jin Hao. Robust test for structural change points in strongly mixing heavy-tailed sequences based on M-estimation[J]. Statistics and Decision, 2024, 40(8): 34-40.
[16] Antoch J, Hušková M, Prášková Z. Effect of dependence on statistics for determination of change[J]. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 1997, 60(2): 291-310.
[17] Csörgö M, Horváth L. Limit theorems in change-points analysis[M]. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 1997: 25-45.
[18] Adnan R, Rasheed B A, Saffari S E, et al. Performance of robust wild bootstrap estimation of linear model in the presence of outliers and heteroscedasticity errors[J]. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Mechanics, 2015, 8(1): 13-31.
[19] You Jinhong, Chen Gemai. Wild bootstrap estimation in partially linear models with heteroscedasticity[J]. Statistics and Probability Letters, 2006, 76(4): 340-348.
[20] Davidson J. Stochastic limit theory: an introduction for econometricians[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994: 315-340.
[21] Andrews D W K. Heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix estimation[J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1991, 59(3): 817-858.
[22] Amemiya T. Regression analysis when the dependent variable is truncated normal[J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1973, 41(6): 997-1016.
[23] Goldfeld S M, Quandt R E. Some tests for homoscedasticity[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1965, 60(310): 539-547.
[1] 段颖鹏, 胡琳. 带泊松跳随机微分方程的组合解法[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2026, 61(4): 123-132.
[2] 吕平涛,王才士,赵积君. 基于Hadamard游荡的一类具有相同特征值和连续谱的两态量子游荡[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(8): 84-93.
[3] 高玉峰,冯德成. 条件弱鞅和条件N-弱鞅的上(下)穿不等式[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(6): 122-126.
[4] 张亚茹,夏莉,张典秋. 混合双分数布朗运动下的永久美式回望期权定价[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(4): 98-107.
[5] 严晓东. 策略极限理论与策略统计学习[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(1): 1-10, 45.
[6] 徐诚浩,王开永. 二维离散时间风险模型的破产概率[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2023, 58(11): 27-34, 52.
[7] 杨鹏,张晓燕. 基于Stackelberg博弈的最优再保险合同设计[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2023, 58(11): 1-14,26.
[8] 张诗苗,吕艳. 带Lévy噪声的Lotka-Volterra竞争模型的参数估计[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2023, 58(10): 24-31.
[9] 丁佳鑫,郭永峰,米丽娜. 高斯噪声和Lévy噪声激励下欠阻尼周期势系统的相变行为[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2023, 58(8): 111-117.
[10] 高琦,戴洪帅,武艳华. 基于MPEWMA控制图的串联排队网络的监测与控制[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2023, 58(8): 104-110, 117.
[11] 陈叶君,丁惠生. 带有Stepanov概周期系数的无穷维随机微分方程的θ-概周期解[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2023, 58(6): 113-126.
[12] 周玉兰,李转,李晓慧. 连续时间Guichardet-Fock空间中修正随机梯度算子的性质[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2018, 53(12): 62-68.
[13] 李永明,聂彩玲,刘超,郭建华. 负超可加阵列下非参数回归函数估计的相合性[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2018, 53(12): 69-74.
[14] 陈昊君,郑莹,马明,边莉娜,刘华. 自激滤过泊松过程的协方差[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2018, 53(12): 75-79.
[15] 马明,边莉娜,刘华. 基于事件点联合分布的自激滤过泊松过程的低阶矩[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2018, 53(4): 55-58.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!