您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（理学版）》

《山东大学学报(理学版)》 ›› 2026, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (10): 133-144.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.0.2026.030

• 生态风险与综合治理 • 上一篇    

黄河流域非法采矿的生态环境损害评估与实践应对

杨学巧1,闫晗1,董继斌1,冷艳秋1,罗亚飞1,任亚楠1,沈浩松2,郑培明3,4,5*   

  1. 1.山东省环科院环境检测有限公司, 山东 济南 250100;2.山东省环科院股份有限公司, 山东 济南 250100;3.山东大学黄河国家战略研究院, 山东 济南 250100;4.山东大学生命科学学院, 山东 青岛 266237;5.山东省植被生态示范工程技术研究中心, 山东 青岛 266237
  • 发布日期:2026-10-16
  • 通讯作者: 郑培明(1980—),男,教授,博士生导师,博士,研究方向为植被生态学和可持续生态学. E-mail:zhengpeiming@email.sdu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:杨学巧(1987— ),女,高级工程师,研究方向为生态环境损害鉴定评估. E-mail:yangxueqiao1126@163.com*通信作者:郑培明(1980—),男,教授,博士生导师,博士,研究方向为植被生态学和可持续生态学. E-mail:zhengpeiming@email.sdu.edu.cn

Illegal mining in the Yellow River Basin: assessment of eco-environmental damage and its practical responses

YANG Xueqiao1, YAN Han1, DONG Jibin1, LENG Yanqiu1, LUO Yafei1, REN Yanan1, SHEN Haosong2, ZHENG Peiming3,4,5*   

  1. 1. Shandong Huankeyuan Environmental Testing Co., Ltd., Jinan 250100, Shandong, China;
    2. Shandong Academy of Environmental Sciences Co., Ltd., Jinan 250100, Shandong, China;
    3. Yellow River National Strategy Research Institute, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, Shandong, China;
    4. School of Life Sciences, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, Shandong, China;
    5. Shandong Provincial Engineering and Technology Research Center for Vegetation Ecology, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, Shandong, China
  • Published:2026-10-16

PDF (PC)

5

摘要： 针对生态文明法治体系建设中生态环境损害司法鉴定的关键技术需求,本研究聚焦黄河流域非法采矿类案件生态环境损害鉴定评估的方法创新与实践应用。通过实证分析典型案件鉴定过程,提出“全要素-多尺度”评估框架,构建涵盖矿产资源、土壤环境、水环境、生物、生态系统服务功能及次生灾害隐患等维度的综合评价体系,探讨鉴定中的难点问题和解决思路,为黄河流域生态环境损害赔偿制度改革提供科学支撑,为完善环境损害司法鉴定技术标准体系提供重要实践价值。

关键词: 黄河流域, 非法采矿, 生态环境损害, 鉴定评估

Abstract: In response to the critical technological demands for judicial appraisal of eco-environmental damage within the framework of building an ecological civilizations legal system, this study focused on methodological innovation and practical application in the assessment of environmental damage caused by illegal mining cases in the Yellow River Basin. Through empirical analysis of the appraisal process in typical cases, this study proposed an “all-elements and multi-scale” assessment framework and constructed a comprehensive evaluation system covering the dimensions of mineral resources, soil environment, water environment, biota, ecosystem service functions, and potential secondary disaster hazards. It discussed the key challenges and corresponding solutions in the appraisal process. This research provides scientific support for the reform of the eco-environmental damage compensation system in the Yellow River Basin and holds significant practical value for improving the technical standard system of environmental judicial appraisal.

Key words: Yellow River Basin, illegal mining, ecological environment damage, appraisal and assessment

中图分类号: 

  • X382
[1] 最高人民检察院. 关于印发检察机关依法惩治盗采矿产资源犯罪典型案例的通知[EB/OL].(2022-11-11)[2026-06-26]. https://www.spp.gov.cn/xwfbh/dxal/202211/t20221111_592470.shtml. Supreme Peoples Procuratorate. Notice on issuing typical cases of procuratorial organs lawfully punishing the crime of illegal mining[EB/OL].(2022-11-11)[2026-06-26]. https://www.spp.gov.cn/xwfbh/dxal/202211/t20221111_592470.shtml.
[2] 司法部, 生态环境部. 司法部生态环境部关于印发《环境损害司法鉴定执业分类规定》的通知: 司发通〔2019〕56号[EB/OL].(2019-05-09)[2026-06-26]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2019-10/08/content_5437167.htm. Ministry of Justice, Ministry of Ecology and Environment. Notice of the ministry of justice and the ministry of ecology and environment on issuing the provisions on classification of environmental damage judicial expertise practices: sifatong[2019] No. 56[EB/OL].(2019-05-09)[2026-06-26]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2019-10/08/content_5437167.htm.
[3] 於方, 张志宏, 孙倩, 等. 生态环境损害鉴定评估技术方法体系的构建[J]. 环境保护, 2020, 48(24): 16-21. Yu Fang, Zhang Zhihong, Sun Qian, et al. Establishment of methodologies for environmental damage assessment[J]. Environmental Protection, 2020, 48(24): 16-21.
[4] Force R. A comparison of the recovery of compensation for injury to natural resources under the 92 CLC and fund conventions with the US oil pollution act of 1990[C] //Maritime Pollution Liability and Policy: China, Europe and the US. Zuid-Holland: Kluwer Law International, 2010: 263-285.
[5] Paulsen S, Liang L, Parks A, et al. Clean water act compliance during wet weather: lessons and recommendations[C] //Annual Water Environment Federation Technical Exhibition and Conference. 2024:22.
[6] Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University. Comprehensive environmental response, compensation, and liability act(CERCLA): Overview[EB/OL] (2025-07-29)[2026-06-26]. https://libraryguides.law.pace.edu/CERCLA.
[7] 王树义, 刘静. 美国自然资源损害赔偿制度探析[J]. 法学评论, 2009, 27(1): 71-79. Wang Shuyi, Liu Jing. Analysis on the compensation system of natural resources damage in the United States[J]. Law Review, 2009, 27(1): 71-79.
[8] 王慧, 赵胜营. 欧盟环境责任指令的法律解读及其启示[J]. 南宁师范高等专科学校学报, 2007, 24(1): 62-64. Wang Hui, Zhao Shengying. Analysis and inspiration of EU environmental liability instruction[J]. Journal of Nanning Teachers College, 2007, 24(1): 62-64.
[9] 周游, 赵丹, 王虎, 等. 非法开采矿产资源生态环境损害鉴定评估探讨[J]. 环境保护, 2022, 50(12): 57-60. Zhou You, Zhao Dan, Wang Hu, et al. Study on identification and evaluation of ecological environment damage caused by illegal mining of mineral resources[J]. Environmental Protection, 2022, 50(12): 57-60.
[10] 於方, 张衍燊, 齐霁, 等. 环境损害鉴定评估关键技术问题探讨[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2016(1): 18-25. Yu Fang, Zhang Yanshen, Qi Ji, et al. Key technical issues in environmental damage appraisal and assessment[J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2016(1): 18-25.
[11] 郭超, 王伟, 古清月, 等. 非法采矿类公益诉讼案生态环境损害鉴定评估的审查要点探析[J]. 环境保护, 2022, 50(18): 54-58. Guo Chao, Wang Wei, Gu Qingyue, et al. Analysis on review points of ecological environment damage identification and assessment in illegal mining public interest litigation cases[J]. Environmental Protection, 2022, 50(18): 54-58.
[12] 肖庆聪, 於方, 王闯, 等. 非法采矿类生态环境损害鉴定评估技术审核要点探讨[J]. 环境保护, 2023, 51(18): 49-53. Xiao Qingcong, Yu Fang, Wang Chuang, et al. Discussion on the key technical points of the environmental damage identification and assessment for illegal mining[J]. Environmental Protection, 2023, 51(18): 49-53.
[13] 马丽, 田华征, 康蕾. 黄河流域矿产资源开发的生态环境影响与空间管控路径[J]. 资源科学, 2020, 42(1): 137-149. Ma Li, Tian Huazheng, Kang Lei. Eco-environmental impact and spatial control of mineral resources exploitation in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(1): 137-149.
[14] 李春亮, 鲜永亮, 靳仲娥, 等. 历史遗留矿山生态破坏与污染状况评价方法研究: 以黄河流域甘肃段为例[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2025, 33(6): 1242-1252. Li Chunliang, Xian Yongliang, Jin Zhonge, et al. Research on evaluation methods for ecological destruction and pollution status of historical abandoned mines: taking the Gansu section of the Yellow River Basin as an example[J]. Gold Science and Technology, 2025, 33(6): 1242-1252.
[15] 於方, 张衍燊, 徐伟攀. 《生态环境损害鉴定评估技术指南 总纲》解读[J]. 环境保护, 2016, 44(20): 9-11. Yu Fang, Zhang Yanshen, Xu Weipan. Interpretation of the general principles of technical guide for ecological and environmental damage assessment[J]. Environmental Protection, 2016, 44(20): 9-11.
[16] 环境保护部办公厅. 关于印发《生态环境损害鉴定评估技术指南 总纲》和《生态环境损害鉴定评估技术指南 损害调查》的通知[EB/OL].(2016-07-05)[2026-06-26]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgt/201607/t20160705_357139.htm. General Office of the Ministry of Environmental Protection. Notice on issuing the “Technical Guidelines for Identification and Assessment of Eco-Environmental Damage: General Programme” and “Technical Guidelines for Identification and Assessment of Eco-Environmental Damage: Damage Investigation”[EB/OL].(2016-07-05)[2026-06-26]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgt/201607/t20160705_357139.htm.
[17] 生态环境部, 国家林业和草原局. 关于印发《生态环境损害鉴定评估技术指南 森林(试行)》的通知[EB/OL].(2022-07-26)[2026-06-26]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk03/202208/t20220802_990621.html. Ministry of Ecology and Environment, National Forestry and Grassland Administration. Notice on Issuing the “Technical Guidelines for Identification and Assessment of Eco-Environmental Damage: Forest(Trial)”[EB/OL].(2022-07-26)[2026-06-26]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk03/202208/t20220802_990621.html.
[18] GB/T 39791.4—2024生态环境损害鉴定评估技术指南 总纲和关键环节 第4部分:土壤生态环境基线调查与确定[S]. GB/T 39791.4—2024 Technical guidelines for identification and assessment of environmental damage—general principles and key components: part 4: investigation and determination of soil environmental baseline[S].
[19] 於方, 张衍燊, 赵丹, 等. 环境损害鉴定评估技术研究综述[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2017(5): 18-29. Yu Fang, Zhang Yanshen, Zhao Dan, et al. Review on the assessment of environmental damage[J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2017(5): 18-29.
[20] 最高人民法院, 最高人民检察院.关于办理非法采矿、 破坏性采矿刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释[EB/OL].(2016-11-28)[2026-06-26]. https://www.court.gov.cn/fabu/xiangqing/31621.html. Supreme Peoples Court, Supreme Peoples Procuratorate. Interpretation of the supreme peoples court and the supreme peoples procuratorate on several issues concerning the application of law in handling criminal cases of illegal mining and destructive mining [EB/OL].(2016-11-28)[2026-06-26]. https://www.court.gov.cn/fabu/xiangqing/31621.html.
[21] 环境保护部办公厅. 关于印发《环境损害鉴定评估推荐方法(第II版)》的通知[EB/OL].(2014-11-05)[2026-06-26]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgt/201411/t20141105_291159.htm. General Office of the Ministry of Environmental Protection. Notice on issuing the “Recommended Methods for Environmental Damage Identification and Assessment(Version II)”[EB/OL].(2014-11-05)[2026-06-26]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgt/201411/t20141105_291159.htm.
[22] LY/T 2407—2015森林资源资产评估技术规范[S]. LY/T 2407—2015 Norm of techniques for estimation of forest economic values[S].
[23] 中华人民共和国司法部司法鉴定管理局. 农业环境污染事故司法鉴定经济损失估算实施规范[EB/OL].(2014-03-14)[2026-06-26]. https://www.moj.gov.cn/pub/sfbgw/zwfw/zwfwbgxz/202101/1565869651274084861.pdf. Judicial Authentication Administration, Ministry of Justice of the Peoples Republic of China. Implementation specification for economic loss estimation in judicial identification of agricultural environmental pollution accidents [EB/OL].(2014-03-14)[2026-06-26]. https://www.moj.gov.cn/pub/sfbgw/zwfw/zwfwbgxz/202101/1565869651274084861.pdf.
[24] 生态环境部, 最高人民法院, 最高人民检察院, 等. 关于印发《生态环境损害赔偿管理规定》的通知[EB/OL].(2022-04-28)[2026-06-26]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk03/202205/t20220516_982267.html. Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Supreme Peoples Court, Supreme Peoples Procuratorate, et al. Notice on issuing the “Provisions on the Administration of Eco-Environmental Damage Compensation”[EB/OL].(2022-04-28)[2026-06-26]. https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk03/202205/t20220516_982267.html.
[25] 高柳威, 冀晓东, 韩朝, 等. 人工模拟林冠降雨截留试验[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2020, 18(1): 68-78. Gao Liuwei, Ji Xiaodong, Han Chao, et al. An artificial simulated experiment on canopy rainfall interception[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 18(1): 68-78.
[26] 熊婕, 辛颖, 赵雨森. 水源涵养林水文生态效应研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2014, 42(2): 463-465. Xiong Jie, Xin Ying, Zhao Yusen. Research advance of water conservation forests hydrological ecological effects[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 42(2): 463-465.
[27] 刘秀丽, 邹璀. 全国及九大流域分类用水影子价格的计算与预测[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2014, 34(4): 10-15. Liu Xiuli, Zou Cui. Calculating and forecasting shadow prices of all kinds of water in China and its nine major river basins[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 2014, 34(4): 10-15.
[1] 方兰,王阳阳. 多层级治理下生态产品价值实现的激励机制研究——基于黄河流域的三阶段博弈分析[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2026, 61(10): 8-28.
[2] 闫姝婉,刘建. 黄河流域生态系统服务供需及生态价值的变化[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2026, 61(10): 59-71.
[3] 乔元波,王怡橦. 黄河流域农业生态与乡村振兴协同发展:研究脉络、核心议题与未来展望[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2026, 61(10): 29-45.
[4] 王文璇,范勇,王鑫,肖文杰. 黄河流域山东段城镇化与生态系统服务空间交互关系[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2026, 61(10): 72-86.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(理学版)》编辑部　
地址: 山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区（250100）　电话: +86-0531-88366917　E-mail: xblxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发