您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（理学版）》

《山东大学学报(理学版)》 ›› 2021, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (3): 12-22.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.0.2020.493

•   • 上一篇    下一篇

动态竞争下物流服务平台增值服务投资与定价

桂云苗1(),刘大玉1,胡红春2,*()   

  1. 1. 安徽工程大学经济与管理学院, 安徽 芜湖 241000
    2. 中国烟草总公司职工进修学院, 河南 郑州 450008
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-14 出版日期:2021-03-20 发布日期:2021-03-16
  • 通讯作者: 胡红春 E-mail:ymgui@ahpu.edu.cn;759150070@qq.com
  • 作者简介:桂云苗(1978—), 男, 博士, 教授, 研究方向为平台运营管理. E-mail: ymgui@ahpu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省哲学社科规划项目(AHSKY2016D13)

Value-added service investment and pricing of logistics service platform under dynamic competition

Yun-miao GUI1(),Da-yu LIU1,Hong-chun HU2,*()   

  1. 1. School of Economics and Management, Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu 241000, Anhui, China
    2. Staff Development Institute of China National Tobacco Corporation, Zhengzhou 450008, Henan, China
  • Received:2020-09-14 Online:2021-03-20 Published:2021-03-16
  • Contact: Hong-chun HU E-mail:ymgui@ahpu.edu.cn;759150070@qq.com

RichHTML

32

PDF (PC)

836

摘要：

投资增值服务已成为物流服务平台提升竞争优势的重要手段。在考虑双边用户网络外部性和用户归属行为的基础上, 结合Hotelling模型和Stackelberg主从博弈模型, 建立不同投资时序下物流服务平台增值服务投资决策与定价模型, 分别探讨了各种用户不同归属条件下的物流服务平台最优投资定价策略。通过研究发现: 当双边单归属时, 物流服务平台投资高质量增值服务占优; 当消费者多归属、供应商单归属时, 先行动平台投资高质量增值服务占优; 当供应商多归属、消费者单归属时, 后行动平台投资高质量增值服务占优; 当双边用户多归属时, 物流服务平台投资高质量增值服务占优。

关键词: 物流服务平台, 用户归属, 增值服务, 网络外部性

Abstract:

Investment in value-added services has become an important means for logistics service platforms to enhance their competitive advantages. Based on the consideration of the network externality and users ownership behavior, the investment decision-making and pricing model of logistics service platform under different investment time series is developed, which combined Hotelling model and Stackelberg master-slave game model. The results show that: when the bilateral users are single-homing, the investment in high-quality value-added services is dominant; when the consumers are multi-homing and the suppliers are single-homing, the acted platform investment in high-quality value-added services is better; when the suppliers are multi-homing and the consumers are single-homing, the acting platform prefer to invest high-quality value-added services; when the bilateral users are multi-homing, the investment in high-quality value-added services is optimal.

Key words: logistics service platform, users ownership, value-added services, network externality

中图分类号: 

  • F272.3

图1

平台1, 2利润比较"

图2

平台1, 2利润比较"

1 ARMSTRONG M . Competition in two-sided markets[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 2006, 37 (3): 668- 691.
doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00037.x
2 ROCHET J C , TIROLE J . Two-sided markets: a progress report[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 2006, 37 (3): 645- 667.
doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00036.x
3 邢大宁, 赵启兰, 郜红虎. 基于双边市场理论的物流信息平台定价策略研究[J]. 商业经济与管理, 2018, (6): 5- 15.
XING Daning , ZHAO Qilan , GAO Honghu . Study of pricing strategies for logistics information platform based on the theory of two-sided markets[J]. Journal of Business Economics, 2018, (6): 5- 15.
4 卢珂, 周晶, 林小围. 考虑交叉网络外部性的网约车平台市场定价研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28 (7): 169- 178.
LU Ke , ZHOU Jing , LIN Xiaowei . Pricing research of ride-hailing platform: from the view of inter-group network externality[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28 (7): 169- 178.
5 王志宏, 傅长涛. 用户不同归属行为下货运共享平台的定价策略研究[J]. 管理学报, 2019, 16 (7): 1081- 1087.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2019.07.015
WANG Zhihong , FU Changtao . Research on pricing strategy of freight transport sharing platform under different behaviors of users[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2019, 16 (7): 1081- 1087.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2019.07.015
6 张千帆, 董雪. 提供增值服务情形下互联网平台的定价策略[J]. 系统工程, 2018, 36 (2): 47- 54.
ZHANG Qianfan , DONG Xue . Pricing strategy of Internet platform providing value-added services[J]. Systems Engineering, 2018, 36 (2): 47- 54.
7 BELLEFLAMME P , PEITZ M . Platform competition and seller investment incentives[J]. European Economic Review, 2010, 54 (8): 1059- 1076.
doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2010.03.001
8 ANDERSON E G , PAEKER G G , TAN B . Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities[J]. Information Systems Research, 2014, 25 (1): 152- 172.
doi: 10.1287/isre.2013.0505
9 豆国威. 双边平台增值服务的投资和定价策略研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2016.
DOU Guowei. The value-added services investment and pricing strategy on bilateral platform[D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2016.
10 桂云苗, 武众, 龚本刚. 竞争环境下B2C平台增值服务投资决策[J]. 控制与决策, 2019, 34 (2): 395- 405.
GUI Yunmiao , WU Zhong , GONG Bengang . Value-added service investment decision of B2C platform in competition[J]. Control and Decision, 2019, 34 (2): 395- 405.
11 HAGIU A , SPULBER D . First-party content and coordination in two-sided markets[J]. Management Science, 2013, 59 (4): 933- 949.
doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1577
[1] 刘乐民,逯峰,付志超,潘祖请,谢磊. 政府参与高速公路数字化转型的演化博弈[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(9): 98-107.
[2] 史聪,张桂涛,张萧,林帅成. 碳配额与交易监管下基于区块链技术的平台供应链网络运营决策[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(1): 100-114, 123.
[3] 经有国,任君玲,刘肖杨,王海龙,宋楗. 租售混合渠道下异质产品渠道进入与回购策略[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2023, 58(7): 1-17.
[4] 张克勇,张娜. 政府补贴下具互惠偏好的绿色供应链定价与协调[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2022, 57(1): 30-41.
[5] 桂云苗,胡红春,龚本刚. 区块链时代下双边平台信息披露决策研究[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2022, 57(3): 89-95.
[6] 申亮,林飞,王玉燕,丁露萍,范润婕,杨晓光. 财政补贴、绿色消费意愿与企业绿色创新[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2025, 60(6): 76-88.
[7] 桂云苗,杨兰,胡红春. 双边市场下物流平台区块链服务投资决策[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2025, 60(6): 63-75.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(理学版)》编辑部　
地址: 山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区（250100）　电话: +86-0531-88366917　E-mail: xblxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发