您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(理学版)》

《山东大学学报(理学版)》 ›› 2026, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (6): 51-63.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.0.2026.004

• • 上一篇    

复杂可视化环境下的色彩差异感知验证与分析

黄薏霖1,2,胡柞润1,汪云海3,刘姝2,曾琼1*   

  1. 1.山东大学计算机科学与技术学院&山东省算网融合理论与技术重点实验室, 山东 青岛 266237;2.中南大学计算机学院, 湖南 长沙 410083;3.中国人民大学信息学院, 北京 100872
  • 发布日期:2026-06-04
  • 通讯作者: 曾琼(1987— ),女,博士,教授,研究方向为可视化与计算机图形学. E-mail:qiong.zn@sdu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:黄薏霖(2002— ),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为多模态情绪识别. E-mail:yilin10@csu.edu.cn*通信作者:曾琼(1987— ),女,博士,教授,研究方向为可视化与计算机图形学. E-mail:qiong.zn@sdu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(62372271,62132017);国家自然科学基金联合重点项目(U2436209);教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(U25YJCZH090)

Revisiting color differences modeling for complex visualizations

HUANG Yilin1,2, HU Zuorun1, WANG Yunhai3, LIU Shu2, ZENG Qiong1*   

  1. 1. School of Computer Science and Technology &
    Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Computing-Network Integration, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, Shandong, China;
    2. School of Computer Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, Hunan, China;
    3. School of Information Resource Management, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
  • Published:2026-06-04

摘要: 色彩作为一种重要的视觉编码元素,通常与点、线、面等图元共同表征抽象数据信息。色彩差异影响着可视化的可辨别性以及可读性。相关研究表明,人们感知色彩差异的过程受图元形状和大小的影响,但未阐明这一影响与复杂可视化环境中干扰色彩的关联程度。为此,本文在含有多种干扰色彩的复杂可视化环境中探索散点图、折线图、柱状图等不同可视化形式中的色彩差异感知情况。具体而言,本文生成十万余组具有不同干扰图元以及色彩差异的可视化图像,设计并实现用于验证复杂可视化环境下色彩差异感知的实验系统,基于Prolific众包平台采集用户色彩差异感知数据,多角度分析实验结果并构建不同干扰图元中的色彩差异模型。实验结果表明,可视化环境中的其它干扰色彩对于用户色彩差异感知具有影响,且这一影响与图元形状和大小有紧密关联。

关键词: 色差感知, 色差建模, 众包实验, 数据可视化

Abstract: Color, as an important visual encoding channel, is often used in conjunction with visual marks such as points, lines, and areas to represent abstract data. Color difference has great impact on the discriminability and readability of visualizations. Previous research has shown that color difference perception is influenced by the shape and size of graphical elements, yet the extent of this influence in relation to interfering markings remains under-explored. To address this, this paper explored the perception of color differences among various graphical elements within complex visualization environments containing interference colors. We generated data with different interference colors and visual elements(such as scatterplots, bar charts, and line charts), designed and implemented an experimental system to validate color difference perception in complex visualization contexts, conducted a crowdsourcing experiment on Prolific, and performed a multi-faceted analysis of the experimental results to construct color difference models among different visualization settings. Our experimental results demonstrated that interference colors had a significant impact on users perception of color differences. Moreover, the perception of color differences between different interference colors was closely related to the shape and size of the graphical elements.

Key words: color difference perception, color difference modeling, crowdsourcing experiments, data visualization

中图分类号: 

  • TP391
[1] STONE M, SZAFIR D A, SETLUR V. An engineering model for color difference as a function of size[C] //Proceedings of the Color and Imaging Conference. Springfield: Society for Imaging Science and Technology, 2014:253-258.
[2] SZAFIR D A. Modeling color difference for visualization design[J]. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2018, 24(1):392-401.
[3] BERGMAN L D, ROGOWITZ B E, TREINISH L A. A rule-based tool for assisting colormap selection[C] //Proceedings Visualization'95. Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1995:118-125.
[4] HARROWER M, BREWER C A. ColorBrewer.org: an online tool for selecting colour schemes for maps[J]. The Cartographic Journal, 2003, 40(1):27-37.
[5] BREWER C A. Prediction of simultaneous contrast between map colors with Hunts model of color appearance[J]. Color Research and Application, 1996, 21(3):221-235.
[6] GRAMAZIO C C, LAIDLAW D H, SCHLOSS K B. Colorgorical: creating discriminable and preferable color palettes for information visualization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2017, 23(1):521-530.
[7] BRAINARD D H, WANDELL B A. Asymmetric color matching: how color appearance depends on the illuminant[J]. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1992, 9(9):1433-1448.
[8] OICHERMAN B, LUO M, RIGG B, et al. Effect of observer metamerism on colour matching of display and surface colours[J]. Color Research and Application, 2008, 33(5):346-359.
[9] RIZZO P, BIERMAN A, REA M. Color and brightness discrimination of white LEDs[C] //Proceedings of SPIE. Bellingham: SPIE, 2002:235-246.
[10] MULLEN K T. The contrast sensitivity of human colour vision to red-green and blue-yellow chromatic gratings[J]. The Journal of Physiology, 1985, 359(1):381-400.
[11] STOKES M, FAIRCHILD M D, BERNS R S. Precision requirements for digital color reproduction[J]. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 1992, 11(4):406-422.
[12] KRANTZ J H. Stimulus delivery on the web: what can be presented when calibration isnt possible[C] //Proceedings of the Dimensions of Internet Science, 2001:113-130.
[13] SARKAR A, BLONDÉ L, LE CALLET P, et al. A color matching experiment using two displays: design considerations and pilot test results[C] //Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Colour in Graphics, Imaging, and Vision. Springfield: Society for Imaging Science and Technology, 2010:414-422.
[14] CARTER R C, SILVERSTEIN L D. Size matters: improved color-difference estimation for small visual targets[J]. Journal of the Society for Information Display, 2010, 18(1):17-28.
[15] OHNO Y. CIE fundamentals for color measurements[C] //NIP & Digital Fabrication Conference. Springfield: Society for Imaging Science and Technology, 2000, 16:540-545.
[16] SCHANDA J. Colorimetry: understanding the CIE system[M]. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2007:25-100.
[17] International Commission on Illumination. Recommendations on uniform color spaces, color-difference equations, psychometric color terms[M]. Paris: Bureau Central de la CIE, 1978:5-6.
[18] SZAFIR D A, STONE M, GLEICHER M. Adapting color difference for design[C] //Proceedings of the 22nd Color and Imaging Conference. Springfield: Society for Imaging Science and Technology, 2014:228-233.
[19] REINECKE K, FLATLA D R, BROOKS C. Enabling designers to foresee which colors users cannot see[C] //Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM, 2016:2693-2704.
[20] BRYCHTOVÁ A, ÇÖLTEKIN A. The effect of spatial distance on the discriminability of colors in maps[J]. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 2017, 44(3):229-245.
[21] KLAUKE S, WACHTLER T. “Tilt” in color space: hue changes induced by chromatic surrounds[J]. Journal of Vision, 2015, 15(13):17.
[1] 张晓媛, 田毅, 任子涵, 段天宇, 杨斯媛, 张月轩. 拓扑邻域基在密度聚类算法中的应用[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2026, 61(5): 55-64.
[2] 孙迪, 郭义童, 任超, 范海峰, 张传雷. 基于多尺度特征融合与改进注意力的锈蚀螺栓螺帽检测[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2026, 61(1): 1-14.
[3] 仲尚,马丽,刘文哲,李雨豪. 融合多尺度注意力机制和改进特征融合的轻量化水面小目标检测模型[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2026, 61(1): 15-25.
[4] 余雷,孙懿,华金铭,李腊全. 基于深度神经网络的重症监护室脓毒症患者死亡风险预测模型分析[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2026, 61(1): 26-35.
[5] 王军涛,黄强. 基于一般重叠函数的模糊数学形态学边缘检测方法[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2026, 61(1): 36-48.
[6] 李文焱,李丽红,王洪欣. 基于知识度量的模糊粗糙c-均值算法[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2026, 61(1): 49-64.
[7] 孙清,叶军,曾广财,宋苏洋,汪一心. 结合蝙蝠算法和紧密度改进的三支K-means算法[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2026, 61(1): 65-75.
[8] 邹峥,雷雨晟,刘石坚,王定一,邱学炜,史雯雯,周校通. 白蚁分区式微方向感知的精确形态识别[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2026, 61(1): 76-84.
[9] 梁霞,郭洁. 基于在线评论的线上教学平台选择方法[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(9): 108-118.
[10] 黎超,廖薇. 基于医疗知识驱动的中文疾病文本分类模型[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(7): 122-130.
[11] 纪杰,孙承杰,单丽莉,尚伯乐,林磊. 基于提示学习的电信网络诈骗案件分类方法[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(7): 113-121.
[12] 罗奇,苟刚. 基于聚类和群组归一化的多模态对话情绪识别[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(7): 105-112.
[13] 赵峰叙,王健,林原,林鸿飞. 面向排序学习的概率分布优化模型[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(7): 95-104.
[14] 黄兴宇,赵明宇,吕子钰. 面向图神经网络表征学习的类别知识探针[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(7): 85-94.
[15] 桂梁,徐遥,何世柱,张元哲,刘康,赵军. 基于动态邻居选择的知识图谱事实错误检测方法[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(7): 76-84.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!