《山东大学学报(理学版)》 ›› 2026, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (9): 108-122.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.0.2025.133
• • 上一篇
宋家乐1,金浩2,杨云锋1
SONG Jiale1, JIN Hao2, YANG Yunfeng1
摘要: 在强混合异方差序列的持久性变点检验中,为克服异方差性所导致的最小二乘估计偏差,提出基于最小绝对偏差(least absolute deviation, LAD)估计的比值型检验统计量。在理论上不仅可以避免对长期方差的一致估计,也无须对方差函数进行假设和估计。在一定假设条件下,推导出统计量在原假设下的极限分布,并证明其在备择假设下的一致性。数值模拟结果表明,基于LAD估计的比值型检验具有良好的经验水平,且与最小二乘估计相比,其经验势也表现出较强的稳健性。最后通过一组股价数据,进一步验证本文所提方法的有效性和可行性。
中图分类号:
| [1] Chen Zhanshou, Tian Zheng, Zhao Chunhui. Monitoring persistence change in infinite variance observations[J]. Journal of the Korean Statistical Society, 2012, 41(1): 61-73. [2] 陈占寿, 田铮. 含趋势项时间序列持久性变点监测[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2014, 34(4): 936-943. Chen Zhanshou, Tian Zheng. Monitoring change in persistence in time series with trend[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2014, 34(4): 936-943. [3] De Long J B, Summers L H, Mankiw N G, et al. How does macroeconomic policy affect output?[J]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1988, 1988(2): 433-494. [4] Hakkio C S, Rush M. Is the budget deficit “too large?”[J]. Economic Inquiry, 2010, 29(3): 429-445. [5] Kim J. Detection of change in persistence of a linear time series[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2000, 95(1): 97-116. [6] Busetti F, Taylor A M R. Tests of stationarity against a change in persistence[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2004, 123(1): 33-66. [7] Leybourne S J, Kim T H, Taylor A M R. Regression-based tests for a change in persistence[J]. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 2006, 68(5): 595-621. [8] Cavaliere G. Unit root tests under time-varying variances[J]. Econometric Reviews, 2005, 23(3): 259-292. [9] Cavaliere G, Taylor A. Testing for unit roots in time series models with non-stationary volatility[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2007, 140(2): 919-947. [10] White H. Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models[J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1982, 50(1): 1-25. [11] Andrews D W K. Tests for parameter instability and structural change with unknown change point[J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1993, 61(4): 821-856. [12] De Jong R M, Amsler C, Schmidt P. A robust version of the KPSS test based on indicators[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2007, 137(2): 311-333. [13] Wang Kai, Zhu Yanling. M-estimation in high-dimensional linear model[J]. Journal of Inequalities and Applications, 2018, 2018(1): 1-13. [14] 白学. 基于M估计的厚尾序列持久性变点检验[D]. 西安: 西安科技大学, 2023: 13-37. Bai Xue. Persistence change point test for heavy-tailed sequences based on M-estimation[D]. Xian: Xian University of Science and Technology, 2023: 13-37. [15] 朱玲, 乔宝明, 金浩. 基于M估计强混合重尾序列结构变点的鲁棒检验[J]. 统计与决策, 2024, 40(8): 34-40. Zhu Ling, Qiao Baoming, Jin Hao. Robust test for structural change points in strongly mixing heavy-tailed sequences based on M-estimation[J]. Statistics and Decision, 2024, 40(8): 34-40. [16] Antoch J, Huková M, Práková Z. Effect of dependence on statistics for determination of change[J]. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 1997, 60(2): 291-310. [17] Csörgö M, Horváth L. Limit theorems in change-points analysis[M]. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 1997: 25-45. [18] Adnan R, Rasheed B A, Saffari S E, et al. Performance of robust wild bootstrap estimation of linear model in the presence of outliers and heteroscedasticity errors[J]. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Mechanics, 2015, 8(1): 13-31. [19] You Jinhong, Chen Gemai. Wild bootstrap estimation in partially linear models with heteroscedasticity[J]. Statistics and Probability Letters, 2006, 76(4): 340-348. [20] Davidson J. Stochastic limit theory: an introduction for econometricians[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994: 315-340. [21] Andrews D W K. Heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix estimation[J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1991, 59(3): 817-858. [22] Amemiya T. Regression analysis when the dependent variable is truncated normal[J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1973, 41(6): 997-1016. [23] Goldfeld S M, Quandt R E. Some tests for homoscedasticity[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1965, 60(310): 539-547. |
| [1] | 段颖鹏, 胡琳. 带泊松跳随机微分方程的组合解法[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2026, 61(4): 123-132. |
| [2] | 吕平涛,王才士,赵积君. 基于Hadamard游荡的一类具有相同特征值和连续谱的两态量子游荡[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(8): 84-93. |
| [3] | 高玉峰,冯德成. 条件弱鞅和条件N-弱鞅的上(下)穿不等式[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(6): 122-126. |
| [4] | 张亚茹,夏莉,张典秋. 混合双分数布朗运动下的永久美式回望期权定价[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(4): 98-107. |
| [5] | 严晓东. 策略极限理论与策略统计学习[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(1): 1-10, 45. |
| [6] | 徐诚浩,王开永. 二维离散时间风险模型的破产概率[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2023, 58(11): 27-34, 52. |
| [7] | 杨鹏,张晓燕. 基于Stackelberg博弈的最优再保险合同设计[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2023, 58(11): 1-14,26. |
| [8] | 张诗苗,吕艳. 带Lévy噪声的Lotka-Volterra竞争模型的参数估计[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2023, 58(10): 24-31. |
| [9] | 丁佳鑫,郭永峰,米丽娜. 高斯噪声和Lévy噪声激励下欠阻尼周期势系统的相变行为[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2023, 58(8): 111-117. |
| [10] | 高琦,戴洪帅,武艳华. 基于MPEWMA控制图的串联排队网络的监测与控制[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2023, 58(8): 104-110, 117. |
| [11] | 陈叶君,丁惠生. 带有Stepanov概周期系数的无穷维随机微分方程的θ-概周期解[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2023, 58(6): 113-126. |
| [12] | 周玉兰,李转,李晓慧. 连续时间Guichardet-Fock空间中修正随机梯度算子的性质[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2018, 53(12): 62-68. |
| [13] | 李永明,聂彩玲,刘超,郭建华. 负超可加阵列下非参数回归函数估计的相合性[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2018, 53(12): 69-74. |
| [14] | 陈昊君,郑莹,马明,边莉娜,刘华. 自激滤过泊松过程的协方差[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2018, 53(12): 75-79. |
| [15] | 马明,边莉娜,刘华. 基于事件点联合分布的自激滤过泊松过程的低阶矩[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2018, 53(4): 55-58. |
|
||