您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(理学版)》

《山东大学学报(理学版)》 ›› 2023, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (5): 101-110.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.0.2021.406

• • 上一篇    

碳政策下损失厌恶型双采购资源企业的订购策略

张瑜1,张善美2*,柏庆国1,3,屈彪1,3   

  1. 1.曲阜师范大学管理学院, 山东 日照 276826;2.曲阜师范大学图书馆, 山东 日照 276826;3.曲阜师范大学运筹学研究院, 山东 日照 276826
  • 发布日期:2023-05-15
  • 作者简介:张瑜(1996— ), 女, 硕士研究生, 研究方向为可持续管理. E-mail:zy1298747935@163.com*通信作者简介:张善美(1970— ),女,硕士,研究方向为管理运筹学. E-mail:zhshmqfnu@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(71771138,12271309);山东省泰山学者专项基金资助项目(tsqn201812061);山东省自然科学基金资助项目(ZR2022MA038,ZR2019PA009);山东省高等学校青创创新团队项目(2019KJI006)

Ordering strategy for loss-averse dual sourcing enterprises under carbon emission regulations

ZHANG Yu1, ZHANG Shanmei2*, BAI Qingguo1,3, QU Biao1,3   

  1. 1. School of Management, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276826, Shandong, China;
    2. Qufu Normal University Library, Rizhao 276826, Shandong, China;
    3. Institute of Operations Research, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276826, Shandong, China
  • Published:2023-05-15

摘要: 构建了碳税和碳限额政策下损失厌恶零售商的双采购资源模型。求解需求不确定情况下零售商的最优订购决策,进而得到期望效用和碳排放。将两政策下的最优决策分别与无碳约束情形进行比较。结果表明:两种碳政策在有效管理碳排放的同时会降低零售商的期望效用;与碳税政策相比,碳限额政策在一定条件下可达到高效用利润与低碳排放的效果。对比单采购与双采购资源两种模式,得到各自效用利润与碳排放量的优势范围。最后,通过数值实验分别描述碳税、碳配额和零售商损失厌恶系数对最优决策的影响。

关键词: 碳税, 碳配额, 损失厌恶, 双采购资源

Abstract: A dual sourcing model of a loss-averse retailer under carbon tax and mandatory carbon emission capacity regulations is proposed. The optimal ordering decision of the retailer under the condition of uncertain demand is solved, and the expected utility and carbon emissions are obtained. Under the optimal results for the case of without carbon constraint, both regulations reduce the expected utility of retailers while effectively managing carbon emissions. Mandatory carbon emissions capacity regulation exhibits higher utility and lower carbon emission under some circumstances. By comparing the two models of single sourcing and dual sourcing of resources, the advantageous range of their respective utility profits and carbon emissions are obtained. Finally, the effects of carbon tax, carbon quota and retailers loss aversions coefficient on optimal decisions are determined through numerical experiments.

Key words: carbon tax, carbon cap, loss aversion, dual sourcing

中图分类号: 

  • F253
[1] ZHANG B, XU L. Multi-item production planning with carbon cap and trade mechanism[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 144(1):118-127.
[2] ABSI N, DAUZÈRE-PÉRÈS S, KEDAD-SIDHOUM S, et al. Lot sizing with carbon emission constraints[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2013, 227(1):55-61.
[3] 李伯棠,赵刚. 基于鲁棒优化的低碳再制造物流网络模型[J].山东大学学报(理学版),2017,52(1):43-55. LI Botang, ZHAO Gang. Model of low carbon remanufacturing logistics network based on robust optimization[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Natural Science), 2017, 52(1):43-55.
[4] 柏庆国,徐健腾.碳政策下分布式鲁棒优化模型的生产与减排策略[J].系统工程理论与实践,2016,36(7):1696-1709. BAI Qingguo, XU Jianteng. Joint production and emission reduction decisions for the distributionally robust optimization problem under carbon regulations[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2016, 36(7):1696-1709.
[5] 王明喜,胡毅,郭冬梅,等.碳税视角下最优排放实施与企业减排投资竞争[J]. 管理评论,2021,33(8):17-28. WANG Mingxi, HU Yi, GUO Dongmei, et al. Optimal emissions implementation and enterprises abatement investment competition under the carbon tax tool[J]. Management Review, 2021, 33(8):17-28.
[6] BAI Q G, XU J T, MENG F W, et al. Impact of cap-and-trade regulation on coordinating perishable products supply chain with cost learning[J]. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17(6):3417.
[7] WARBURTON R D H, STRATTON R. The optimal quantity of quick response manufacturing for an onshore and offshore sourcing model[J]. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 2005, 8(2):125-141.
[8] MA L J, XUE W L, ZHAO Y X, et al. Loss-averse newsvendor problem with supply risk[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2016, 67(2):214-228.
[9] 余建军,朱丹,钟远光,等.双源供应下损失厌恶零售商的订货及补贴策略[J]. 控制理论与应用, 2019, 36(9):1545-1556. YU Jianjun, ZHU Dan, ZHONG Yuanguang, et al. Ordering and subsidizing strategies for loss-averse retailer under dual-sourcing[J]. Control Theory & Applications, 2019, 36(9):1545-1556.
[10] TAN B, FENG Q, CHEN W. Dual sourcing under random supply capacities:the role of the slow supplier[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2016, 25(7):1232-1244.
[11] ARIKAN E, JAMMERNEGG W. The single period inventory model under dual sourcing and product carbon footprint constraint[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2014, 157:15-23.
[12] BAI Q G, CHEN M Y. The distributionally robust newsvendor problem with dual sourcing under carbon tax and cap-and-trade regulations[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2016, 98:260-274.
[13] SCHWEITZER M E, CACHON G P. Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution:experimental evidence[J]. Management Science, 2000, 46(3):404-420.
[14] LI X, LI Y J. On lot-sizing problem in a random yield production system under loss aversion[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2016, 240(2):415-434.
[15] ZHOU Y, CHAN C K, WONG K H. A multi-period supply chain network equilibrium model considering retailers’ uncertain demands and dynamic loss-averse behaviors[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2018, 118:51-76.
[16] XU X S, CHAN F T S, CHAN C K. Optimal option purchase decision of a loss-averse retailer under emergent replenishment[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2019, 57(14):4594-4620.
[17] 王宣涛,周国林,张玉林.考虑策略型消费者损失厌恶下的新产品预售与退货策略研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2019,39(6):1479-1486. WANG Xuantao, ZHOU Guolin, ZHANG Yulin. Advance selling and return policy for new products considering strategic consumers loss aversion[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2019, 39(6):1479-1486.
[18] 柏庆国,徐贤浩.碳排放政策下二级易变质产品供应链的联合订购策略[J].管理工程学报,2018,32(4):167-177. BAI Qingguo, XU Xianhao. Joint order policy for a two-echelon supply chain with deteriorating items under carbon emission regulations[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2018, 32(4):167-177.
[1] 何新华,尤彩云,胡文发. 联合契约应对突发需求增大的供应链协调策略[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2019, 54(5): 68-76.
[2] 肖迪,金雯雯. C2B电商情境下考虑横向竞争的供应链定价策略[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2018, 53(5): 53-60.
[3] 何新华,万帆,胡文发,郑爱兵. 复杂风险变量随机模拟下的应急供应调度[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2018, 53(5): 1-11.
[4] 何新华,胡文发,许长延,陈继红. 考虑随机性与模糊性的应急服务供应链转运策略[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2016, 51(12): 67-77.
[5] 何新华, 胡文发, 肖敏. 突发事件下应急服务供应链的期权协同决策[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2015, 50(11): 81-90.
[6] 桂云苗, 沈珺, 胡红春, 刘兆琦. 碳排放交易机制下随机性库存控制模型研究[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2015, 50(09): 55-60.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!