JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE) ›› 2024, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (9): 88-97.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.0.2023.153

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comprehensive credit evaluation of transportation enterprises based on game theory combinatorial weighting-TOPSIS method

Antao LYU1(),Yongbin GAO2,Wen HAN3,*(),Ying DONG3,Zhenfang ZHONG2,Qingchun MENG2   

  1. 1. Shandong College of Highway Technician, Jinan 271100, Shandong, China
    2. School of Management, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, Shandong, China
    3. Shandong Transportation Research Institute, Jinan 250031, Shandong, China
  • Received:2023-04-13 Online:2024-09-20 Published:2024-10-10
  • Contact: Wen HAN E-mail:lvantao@126.com;hanwen@sdjtky.cn

RichHTML

1

PDF (PC)

340

Abstract:

Firstly, the index system of comprehensive credit evaluation of transportation enterprises is constructed from four aspects: basic information, reward recognition, reputation assessment and administrative penalty. Secondly, the weights of each index are obtained by using game theory combination assignment method, and the comprehensive credit evaluation model of enterprises by game theory combination assignment-TOPSIS method is constructed. Finally, the data of transportation enterprises in Shandong Province are used for experimental analysis to obtain the credit evaluation results. The study shows that: the weighting of each first-level index is ranked as administrative penalty, award recognition, reputation assessment, basic information, indicating that the relevant departments should focus on assessing the administrative punishment index of enterprises; the credit evaluation results are consistent with the actual, which verifies the rationality of the evaluation model.

Key words: comprehensive credit evaluation, transportation enterprise, TOPSIS method, combined weighting

CLC Number: 

  • F506

Table 1

Transportation enterprise comprehensive credit evaluation index"

一级指标 二级指标 指标类型
基本信息A1 属性完整度B1 定量
奖励表彰A2 企业奖励B2 定性
从业人员奖励B3 定性
企业表彰B4 定性
从业人员表彰B5 定性
信誉考评A3 企业信誉考评B6 定性
从业人员信誉考评B7 定性
行政处罚A4 一般行政处罚B8 定性
严重行政处罚B9 定性

Table 2

Qualitative index scoring criteria"

指标 打分标准 分值
信誉考评 信誉考评为AA 5
信誉考评为A 4
信誉考评为B 3
信誉考评为C 2
信誉考评为D 1
行政处罚 行政拘留 6
暂扣或者吊销许可证、暂扣或者吊销执照 5
责令停产停业 4
没收违法所得、没收非法财物 3
罚款 2
警告 1
奖励表彰 国家级 4
省部级 3
地(市)级 2
区(县)级 1

Table 3

Table of values assigned between adjacent indicators"

序号 rk赋值 相邻指标jk-1与jk的重要程度
1 1.0 相邻指标jk-1与jk具有相同重要程度
2 1.2 相邻指标jk-1比jk稍微重要
3 1.4 相邻指标jk-1比jk明显重要
4 1.6 相邻指标jk-1比jk强烈重要
5 1.8 相邻指标jk-1比jk极端重要
6 1.1、1.3、1.5、1.7 介于两者之间

Fig.1

Transportation comprehensive credit evaluation process based on combinatorial weighting-TOPSIS method"

Table 4

Credit evaluation index data of transportation enterprise"

企业代码 指标代码
B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9
E1 0.85 0 0 0 0 2 10 12 23
E2 0.87 0 0 0 1 5 6 4 5
E3 0.90 0 0 0 0 3 9 10 6
E4 0.90 0 1 0 0 12 5 3 5
E5 0.93 1 0 0 1 4 5 2 0
E6 0.96 7 0 1 1 15 32 1 0

Table 5

Enterprise comprehensive credit evaluation index weighting results"

序关系排序 指标 熵值法客观权重w1T 重要性之比 G1法主观权重w2T 组合权重w*
1 企业信誉考评 0.115 9 0.215 0 0.202 9
2 严重行政处罚 0.132 4 1.0 0.215 0 0.204 9
3 一般行政处罚 0.117 9 1.4 0.153 6 0.149 2
4 企业奖励 0.094 6 1.3 0.118 1 0.115 2
5 企业表彰 0.119 1 1.2 0.098 4 0.100 9
6 从业人员信誉考评 0.080 1 1.3 0.075 7 0.076 2
7 从业人员奖励 0.110 6 1.4 0.054 1 0.061 0
8 从业人员表彰 0.133 3 1.2 0.045 1 0.055 9
9 属性完整度 0.096 2 1.8 0.025 0 0.033 7

Table 6

Transportation enterprise credit evaluation ranking results"

企业代码 正理想解C+ 负理想解C- 相对贴进度Si 排序结果
E1 0.375 1 0.014 1 3.63 6
E2 0.247 7 0.207 0 45.53 4
E3 0.296 1 0.155 8 34.48 5
E4 0.194 0 0.262 6 57.50 2
E5 0.243 3 0.255 7 51.23 3
E6 0.061 0 0.372 8 85.94 1

Fig.2

Radar map of transport enterprises' relative progress results and weighted standardized data of each index"

1 弓永章, 储雪俭. 公路货运融资及定价信用识别研究[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2018, 413 (11): 139- 142.
GONG Yongzhang , CHU Xuejian . Research on the credit identification of road cargo transportation finance activities[J]. Price: Theory & Practice, 2018, 413 (11): 139- 142.
2 刘帅, 唐伯明, 刘松. 公路物流公共信息平台信用判别与风险防范研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2018, 35 (3): 151- 158.
LIU Shuai , TANG Boming , LIU Song . Study on credit discrimination and risk prevention of highway logistics public information platform[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2018, 35 (3): 151- 158.
3 张红艳, 高鹏. 水利水电工程安全管理风险分析及对策[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2017, 13 (S2): 89- 92.
ZHANG Hongyan , GAO Peng . Risk analysis and countermeasures of water resources and hydropower engineering safety management[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2017, 13 (S2): 89- 92.
4 彭张林, 张强, 杨善林. 综合评价理论与方法研究综述[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23 (S1): 245- 256.
PENG Zhanglin , ZHANG Qiang , YANG Shanlin . Review on theory and method of cloud manufacturing service evaluation[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2015, 23 (S1): 245- 256.
5 邓雪, 李家铭, 曾浩健, 等. 层次分析法权重计算方法分析及其应用研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2012, 42 (7): 93- 100.
DENG Xue , LI Jiaming , ZENG Haojian , et al. Research on computation methods of AHP wight vector and its applications[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2012, 42 (7): 93- 100.
6 陈晓红, 杨志慧. 基于改进模糊综合评价法的信用评估体系研究: 以我国中小上市公司为样本的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23 (1): 146- 153.
CHEN Xiaohong , YANG Zhihui . The study of credit evaluation system based on improved fuzzy evaluation method: evidence from small and medium-sized enterprises in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23 (1): 146- 153.
7 刘艳春, 崔永生. 供应链金融下中小企业信用风险评价: 基于SEM和灰色关联度模型[J]. 技术经济与管理研究, 2016, 245 (12): 14- 19.
LIU Yanchun , CUI Yongsheng . Credit risk assessment of small and medium-sized enterprises from the perspective of supply chain: based on SEM and grey correlative analysis model[J]. Technoeconomics & Management Research, 2016, 245 (12): 14- 19.
8 邓爱民, 文慧, 李红, 等. 供应链金融下第三方物流信用评价研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24 (S1): 564- 570.
DENG Aimin , WEN Hui , LI Hong , et al. Research of TPL credit evaluation under supply chain finance[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24 (S1): 564- 570.
9 杨星, 布慧敏, 郭璐. 一个简单的国有企业信用评估模型[J]. 统计与决策, 2005, (9): 21- 22.
YANG Xing , BU Huimin , GUO Lu . A simple model of credit assessment for state-owned enterprises[J]. Statistics and Decision, 2005, (9): 21- 22.
10 张庆年, 张瑨, 杨杰, 等. 基于聚类分析的水上交通事故影响因素研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 41 (6): 1- 7.
ZHANG Qingnian , ZHANG Jin , YANG Jie , et al. Influencing factors of waterway traffic accidents based on clustering analysis[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science), 2022, 41 (6): 1- 7.
11 吴杰. 数据包络分析(DEA)的交叉效率研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2008.
WU Jie. Researches on cross efficiency of data envelopment analysis (DEA): the efficiency evaluation method based on game theory[D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2008.
12 周文坤, 王成付. 供应链融资模式下中小企业信用风险评估研究: 基于左右得分的模糊TOPSIS算法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2015, 24 (1): 209- 215.
ZHOU Wenkun , WANG Chengfu . Study on SMEs credit risk assessment in the mode of supply chain finance: based on left and right scores fuzzy TOPSIS[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2015, 24 (1): 209- 215.
13 郭冬冬. 基于模糊综合评价方法的中小企业信用评级研究[D]. 广州: 暨南大学, 2009.
GUO Dongdong. Evaluation of small-and-medium-sized businesses credit based on the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[D]. Guangzhou: Jinan University.
14 ZAVADSKAS E K , MARDANI A , TURSKIS Z , et al. Development of TOPSIS method to solve complicated decision-making problems: an overview on developments from 2000 to 2015[J]. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 2016, 15 (3): 645- 682.
15 许旺土, 文琰杰. 基于组合客观赋权法的交通信用评级方法[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 41 (4): 27- 32.
XU Wangtu , WEN Yanjie . Traffic credit rating method based on combined objective weighting method[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science), 2022, 41 (4): 27- 32.
16 DE BOER P T , KROESE D P , MANNOR S , et al. A tutorial on the cross-entropy method[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2015, 134, 19- 67.
17 DIAKOULAKI D , MAVROTAS G , PAPAYANNAKIS L , et al. Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the critic method[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 1995, 22 (7): 763- 770.
18 HSU C C . Evaluation criteria for blog design and analysis of causal relationships using factor analysis and DEMATEL[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39 (1): 187- 193.
19 胡杰, 鲍帆. 基于组合赋权-TOPSIS模型的机场运行效率评价[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2023, 35 (12): 2570- 2581.
HU Jie , BAO Fan . Airport operational efficiency evaluation based on the combined weighting-TOPSIS model[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2023, 35 (12): 2570- 2581.
20 SAATY T L . Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process[J]. International Journal of Services Sciences, 2008, 1 (1): 83- 98.
21 郭亚军, 潘德惠. 一类决策问题的新算法[J]. 决策与决策支持系统, 1992, 2 (3): 56- 62.
GUO Yajun , PAN Dehui . A new algorithm for a class of decision problems[J]. Decision and Decision Support Systems, 1992, 2 (3): 56- 62.
22 周素萍. 中小企业社会信用体系综合模糊评价[J]. 统计与决策, 2007, 242 (14): 171- 174.
ZHOU Suping . Comprehensive vague evaluation of the social credit system of small and medium-sized enterprises[J]. Statistics and Decision, 2007, 242 (14): 171- 174.
23 李茹, 马育林, 田欢, 等. 基于熵值和G1法的自动驾驶车辆综合智能定量评价[J]. 汽车工程, 2020, 42 (10): 1327- 1334.
LI Ru , MA Yulin , TIAN Huan , et al. Comprehensive intelligent quantitative evaluation of autonomous vehicle based on entropy and G1 methods[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2020, 42 (10): 1327- 1334.
24 王学军, 郭亚军. 基于G1法的判断矩阵的一致性分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2006, (3): 65- 70.
WANG Xuejun , GUO Yajun . Analyzing the consistency of comparison matrix based on G1 method[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2006, (3): 65- 70.
25 卓亚娟, 贾志绚, 韩智强, 等. 基于组合赋权-TOPSIS法的城市平面立交交通组织评价研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2022, 39 (9): 140- 148.
ZHUO Yajuan , JIA Zhixun , HAN Zhiqiang , et al. Study on evaluation of urban plane interchange traffic organization based on combined weighting-TOPSIS method[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2022, 39 (9): 140- 148.
26 李刚, 李建平, 孙晓蕾, 等. 主客观权重的组合方式及其合理性研究[J]. 管理评论, 2017, 29 (12): 17-26, 61.
LI Gang , LI Jianping , SUN Xiaolei , et al. Research on a combined method of subjective-objective weighing and the its rationality[J]. Management Review, 2017, 29 (12): 17-26, 61.
27 黄耀倞, 许拴梅, 姜苗苗, 等. 基于博弈论组合赋权的航道水域通航安全评价[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2021, 21 (6): 2430- 2437.
HUANG Yaoliang , XU Shuanmei , JIANG Miaomiao , et al. Evaluation for the channel waters navigation safety based on the synthetic weighing of the game theory[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2021, 21 (6): 2430- 2437.
28 姜玉梅, 田景梅, 李新运. CRITIC-TOPSIS方法下的高校图书馆建设服务绩效评价[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2018, 38 (3): 101- 107.
JIANG Yumei , TIAN Jingmei , LI Xinyun . Research on performance evaluation of university libraries based on CRITIC-TOPSIS methods[J]. Library Tribune, 2018, 38 (3): 101- 107.
29 李泽东, 曹振, 张如明, 等. 熵权-TOPSIS法在华北石质山区常用造林树种抗旱性评价中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2020, 55 (1): 117- 126.
doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.0.2019.362
LI Zedong , CAO Zhen , ZHANG Ruming , et al. Application of entropy weight-TOPSIS method to drought resistance evaluation of common afforestation tree species in the lithoid hilly area of North China[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Natural Science), 2020, 55 (1): 117- 126.
doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.0.2019.362
[1] Ze-dong LI,Zhen CAO,Ru-ming ZHANG,Yi-ran LI,Tian-tian CHENG,Yong-tao ZHANG. Application of entropy weight-TOPSIS method to drought resistance evaluation of common afforestation tree species in the lithoid hilly area of North China [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2020, 55(1): 117-126.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] SUN Shou-bin,MENG Guang-wu ,ZHAO Feng . Dα-Continuity of order homomorphism[J]. J4, 2007, 42(7): 49 -53 .
[2] GUO Ting,BAO Xiao-ming . Influences of sitedirected mutagenesis on the enzymeactivity and thethermostability of the xylose isomerase from Thermus thermphilus[J]. J4, 2006, 41(6): 145 -148 .
[3] WANG Bing . Properties of a quasi-claw-free graph[J]. J4, 2007, 42(10): 111 -113 .
[4] ZHU yan,HOU Jian-feng,WANG Ji-hui . [J]. J4, 2006, 41(5): 59 -62 .
[5] JIANG Xue-lian, SHI Hong-bo*. The learning algorithm of a generative and discriminative combination classifier[J]. J4, 2010, 45(7): 7 -12 .
[6] PENG Yan-fen,LI Bao-zong,LIU Tian-bao . Relationships between the structures and the anesthetic[J]. J4, 2006, 41(5): 148 -150 .
[7] LI Shu-guang,YANG Zhen-guang,HE Zhi-hong . Maximizing profits in multifiber WDM chain and ring networks[J]. J4, 2006, 41(5): 7 -11 .
[8] LIU Xiu-sheng . Two problem of the subnorms on C［a,b］[J]. J4, 2006, 41(5): 84 -86 .
[9] YANG Lun, XU Zheng-gang, WANG Hui*, CHEN Qi-mei, CHEN Wei, HU Yan-xia, SHI Yuan, ZHU Hong-lei, ZENG Yong-qing*. Silence of PID1 gene expression using RNA interference in C2C12 cell line[J]. J4, 2013, 48(1): 36 -42 .
[10] LIU Yan-ping, WU Qun-ying. Almost sure limit theorems for the maximum of Gaussian sequences#br# with optimized weight[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2014, 49(05): 50 -53 .
Copyright 2018 © Editorial office of JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE)
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd