您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(理学版)》

《山东大学学报(理学版)》 ›› 2026, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (10): 72-86.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.0.2026.072

• 人地系统与生态服务 • 上一篇    

黄河流域山东段城镇化与生态系统服务空间交互关系

王文璇,范勇,王鑫*,肖文杰   

  1. 济南大学土木建筑学院, 山东 济南 250022
  • 发布日期:2026-10-16
  • 通讯作者: 王鑫(1992— ),男,讲师,博士,研究方向为土地整治与生态修复、国土空间规划等. E-mail:uao_wangx@ujn.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王文璇(2000— ),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为国土空间规划. E-mail:sdwwx2000@163.com*通信作者:王鑫(1992— ),男,讲师,博士,研究方向为土地整治与生态修复、国土空间规划等. E-mail:uao_wangx@ujn.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2024QG174)

Urbanization and spatial interaction of ecosystem services in the Shandong section of the Yellow River Basin

WANG Wenxuan, FAN Yong, WANG Xin*, XIAO Wenjie   

  1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, Shandong, China
  • Published:2026-10-16

摘要: 系统解析黄河下游城镇化进程与典型生态系统服务的时空交互关系,对落实黄河流域重大国家战略和构建流域生态安全格局具有重要的实践价值。本研究以黄河流域山东段27个县域为研究区,基于2000—2020年多源数据,运用InVEST模型、Pearson相关分析、耦合协调度模型与Tapio脱钩分析方法,系统揭示城镇化与生态系统服务的双向关联特征、静态协调水平与动态演化关系,并通过耦合协调度与脱钩效应的叠加分析,实现县域发展路径的类型划分。结果表明:(1)2000—2020年研究区城镇化综合指数由0.184升至0.282,形成以济南为核心、向外围梯度递减的空间格局,其中土地城镇化指数增幅比例最为突出。(2)研究期内的生态系统服务综合指数总体上升,其中产水量均值增幅42.94%,空间上呈“东北低、中南部高”分布;粮食产量均值累计增幅41.77%,保持“西南高东北低”的格局;碳储存总量下降4.76%,主要受耕地向建设用地转化驱动。(3)Pearson相关分析与耦合协调度分析表明,城镇化与生态系统服务整体呈负相关关系,土地城镇化与粮食产量、碳储存负相关系数年均-0.700左右;二者耦合协调度以基本协调为主,济南核心城区及部分城镇化快速扩张区域协调失衡问题持续加剧。(4)研究期内脱钩状态以强负脱钩、弱负脱钩等非理想状态为主,分区类型以“协调-负脱钩”占主导,多数县域虽维持在基本协调状态,但城镇化发展已导致明显的生态系统服务退化问题。未来应依据不同分区类型,对黄河流域山东段各区域分别实施差异化的空间管控与提质增效策略,以实现区域城镇发展与生态环境保护协调有序推进。

关键词: 城镇化, 生态系统服务, 耦合协调度, 脱钩模型, 黄河流域山东段

Abstract: Systematically analyzing the spatiotemporal interaction between urbanization and typical ecosystem services in the lower Yellow River is of great practical value for implementing the major national strategy of the Yellow River Basin and constructing the basins ecological security pattern. This study took 27 counties in the Shandong section of the Yellow River Basin as the study area. Based on multi-source data from 2000 to 2020, we employed the InVEST model, Pearson correlation analysis, coupling coordination degree model, and Tapio decoupling analysis method to systematically reveal the bidirectional association characteristics, static coordination levels, and dynamic evolutionary relationships between urbanization and ecosystem services. Through the superposition analysis of coupling coordination degree and decoupling effects, a typological classification of county-level development paths was achieved. The results indicated that:(1)From 2000 to 2020, the comprehensive urbanization index of the study area increased from 0.184 to 0.282, forming a spatial pattern with Jinan as the core and gradient decreasing outward, among which the land urbanization index showed the most prominent increase.(2)During the study period, the comprehensive ecosystem service index showed an overall upward trend. Specifically, the average water yield increased by 42.94%, exhibiting a spatial distribution of “low in the northeast and high in the central-south”; the average food production registered a cumulative increase of 41.77%, maintaining a pattern of “high in the southwest and low in the northeast”; total carbon storage decreased by 4.76%, primarily driven by the conversion of cultivated land to construction land.(3)Pearson correlation analysis and coupling coordination degree analysis showed that urbanization and ecosystem services had an overall negative correlation relationship. The average annual negative correlation coefficient between land urbanization and food production and carbon storage was approximately -0.700. The coupling coordination degree between the two was dominated by basic coordination, with the coordination imbalance in the core urban area of Jinan and some rapid urbanization expansion areas continuing to intensify.(4)During the study period, decoupling states were mainly non-ideal states such as strong negative decoupling and weak negative decoupling. The zoning type was dominated by “coordination-negative decoupling”, indicating that although most counties maintained a basic coordination state, urbanization development has led to obvious ecosystem service degradation. In the future, based on different zoning types, differentiated spatial control and quality improvement strategies should be implemented respectively in various regions of the Shandong section of the Yellow River Basin, to achieve orderly and coordinated advancement of regional urban development and ecological environmental protection.

Key words: urbanization, ecosystem services, coupling coordination degree, decoupling model, Shandong section of the Yellow River Basin

中图分类号: 

  • F299
[1] He L J, Xie Z Y, Wu H Q, et al. Exploring the interrelations and driving factors among typical ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, 351: 119794.
[2] 周徽旭, 马骏, 靳亚亚. 黄河流域沿线土地利用功能演变及生态系统服务响应[J/OL]. 环境科学, 2025-11-04. https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202507138. Zhou Huixu, Ma Jun, Jin Yaya. Response ofecosystem service to land use functions evolution along the Yellow River Basin[J/OL]. Environmental Science, 2025-11-04. https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202507138.
[3] 马伟思, 赵志威, 张金烁. 城乡梯度视角下天津市生态系统服务权衡与协同及其驱动因素[J/OL]. 环境科学, 2026-02-02. https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202509291. Ma Weisi, Zhao Zhiwei, Zhang Jinshuo. Trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services and their driving factors in Tianjin from the perspective of urban-rural gradient[J/OL]. Environmental Science, 2026-02-02. https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202509291.
[4] 蔡沐阳, 黄郴, 夏赞才, 等. 环长株潭城市群地区生态系统服务价值时空演变及其影响因素[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 46(4): 163-176. Cai Muyang, Huang Chen, Xia Zancai, et al. Spatiotemporal evolution of ecosystem services value and influencing factors in the urban agglomeration region around Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan[J]. Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences), 2025, 46(4): 163-176.
[5] 乔旭宁, 石漪澜, 郭静, 等. 郑州都市圈不同等级城镇扩张对生态系统服务的影响研究[J]. 地理研究, 2022, 41(7): 1913-1931. Qiao Xuning, Shi Yilan, Guo Jing, et al. Impacts of urban expansion on ecosystem services in different-sized cities of Zhengzhou metropolitan area[J]. Geographical Research, 2022, 41(7): 1913-1931.
[6] 白立敏, 冯兴华, 孙瑞丰, 等. 生境质量对城镇化的时空响应: 以长春市为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(4): 1267-1277. Bai Limin, Feng Xinghua, Sun Ruifeng, et al. Spatial and temporal responses of habitat quality to urbanization: a case study of Changchun City, Jilin Province, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(4): 1267-1277.
[7] 夏楚瑜, 国淏, 赵晶, 等. 京津冀地区生态系统服务对城镇化的多空间尺度动态响应[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(7): 2756-2769. Xia Chuyu, Guo Hao, Zhao Jing, et al. Dynamic responses of ecosystem services to urbanization at multi-spatial scales in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(7): 2756-2769.
[8] 万世龙, 杨海楠, 马丽, 等. 黄河流域城市群水生态系统服务与城镇化权衡协同关系[J]. 资源科学, 2024, 46(3): 505-523. Wan Shilong, Yang Hainan, Ma Li, et al. Trade-offs/synergistic relationship between water ecosystem services and urbanization in the Yellow River Basin urban agglomeration[J]. Resources Science, 2024, 46(3): 505-523.
[9] 何黎鸣, 李小玲, 马晓梅, 等. 兰州-西宁城市群城市化与生态系统服务价值耦合协调关系[J]. 水土保持通报, 2026, 46(2): 330-339. He Liming, Li Xiaoling, Ma Xiaomei, et al. Coupling coordination relationship between urbanization andecosystem service value in Lanzhou-Xining urban agglomeration[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2026, 46(2): 330-339.
[10] 冯俊华, 张路路. 陕西省新型城镇化与生态环境协调度研究[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(11): 4617-4629. Feng Junhua, Zhang Lulu. Coordination degree between new urbanization and ecological environment in Shaanxi Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(11): 4617-4629.
[11] 杜峯屹, 陈松林, 蒲佳豪. 闽东南地区城镇化与生态系统服务的时空耦合分析[J]. 环境科学, 2024, 45(7): 4152-4163. Du Fengyi, Chen Songlin, Pu Jiahao. Spatiotemporal coupling analysis of urbanization and ecosystem services in southeastern Fujian[J]. Environmental Science, 2024, 45(7): 4152-4163.
[12] Chen W X, Chi G Q. Urbanization and ecosystem services: the multi-scale spatial spillover effects and spatial variations[J]. Land Use Policy, 2022, 114: 105964.
[13] 郭爱请, 邵雨婷, 陈辅国. 基于功能分区的河北省土地利用及生态系统服务价值时空演变与模拟[J/OL]. 环境科学. https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202510091. Guo Aiqing, Shao Yuting, Chen Fuguo. Spatiotemporal evolution and simulation of land use and ecosystem service value in Hebei Province based on functional zoning[J/OL]. Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202510091.
[14] 袁菊红, 黄思宇, 张梦娜, 等. 长江经济带新型城镇化与水安全韧性耦合协调的XGBoost-SHAP解析[J/OL]. 水土保持学报, 2026-03-12. https://doi.org/10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2026.03.028. Yuan Juhong, Huang Siyu, Zhang Mengna, et al. XGBoost-SHAP analysis of coupling coordination between new urbanization and water security resilience in Yangtze River economic belt[J/OL]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2026-03-02. https://doi.org/10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2026.03.028.
[15] Liu L Y, Shi Y G, Meng Q. Spatiotemporal patterns and influencing factors of coupling coordination development of ecosystem services and urbanization: a case of western border counties in China[J]. Frontiers in Public Health, 2025, 13: 1579775.
[16] 周雅萍, 王慧敏, 龙爱华. 河西走廊城镇化与生态系统服务时空演变及交互影响分析[J/OL]. 环境科学. https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202508304. Zhou Yaping, Wang Huimin, Long Aihua.Spatial-temporal evolution and interaction between urbanization and ecosystem services in Hexi Corridor[J/OL]. Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202508304.
[17] 韩磊, 高毅丰, 常钰卿, 等. 黄土高原城镇化与生态系统服务脱钩关系[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(20): 9108-9121. Han Lei, Gao Yifeng, Chang Yuqing, et al. Decoupling relationship between urbanization and ecosystem services on the Loess Plateau[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(20): 9108-9121.
[18] 陈田田, 陈果, 王强. 贵州省碳吸收/碳排放时空变化特征及其与经济的脱钩效应[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(3): 915-929. Chen Tiantian, Chen Guo, Wang Qiang. Spatiotemporal change patterns of carbon absorption/emission and decoupling effect with economy in Guizhou Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(3): 915-929.
[19] 邬轶群, 王宣力, 周从越, 等. 浙江省县域新型城镇化与碳排放脱钩的时空特征及影响因素[J]. 地理研究, 2026, 45(1): 125-144. Wu Yiqun, Wang Xuanli, Zhou Congyue, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics and influencing factors of the decoupling between county-level new-type urbanization and carbon emissions:a case study of Zhejiang Province[J]. Geographical Research, 2026, 45(1): 125-144.
[20] 汪仕伟, 刘辉, 傅渝然, 等. 基于三维水生态足迹和脱钩模型的贵阳市水资源可持续性评价[J]. 节水灌溉, 2026(5): 8-16. Wang Shiwei, Liu Hui, Fu Yuran, et al. Sustainability evaluation of water resources in Guiyang City based on three-dimensional water ecological footprint and decoupling model[J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2026(5): 8-16.
[21] 孟庆香, 刘祺, 李保路, 等. 2000—2020年河南省土地利用强度与碳排放脱钩关系[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023, 43(3): 421-429. Meng Qingxiang, Liu Qi, Li Baolu, et al. Decoupling relationship between land use intensity and carbon emissions in Henan Province during 2000-2020[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023, 43(3): 421-429.
[22] Zhang L F, Fang C L, Zhu C. Coupling coordination and decoupling effects: Measuring the interaction between urban agglomeration ecosystems and urbanization[J]. Cities, 2026, 171: 106788.
[23] 李硕硕, 李汝资, 刘耀彬, 等. 环鄱阳湖区县域城镇化对碳收支平衡的影响[J]. 地理研究, 2023, 42(8): 2245-2263. Li Shuoshuo, Li Ruzi, Liu Yaobin, et al. Impact of urbanization on carbon balance in the Poyang Lake region[J]. Geographical Research, 2023, 42(8): 2245-2263.
[24] 刘伟, 张帆, 魏云浩, 等. 珠三角城市群区域生态系统服务供需均衡关系[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(11): 4461-4472. Liu Wei, Zhang Fan, Wei Yunhao, et al. The balance between ecosystem services supply and demand in the Pearl River Delta Urban Agglomerations area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(11): 4461-4472.
[25] 周文佐, 刘高焕, 潘剑君. 土壤有效含水量的经验估算研究: 以东北黑土为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2003, 17(4): 88-95. Zhou Wenzuo, Liu Gaohuan, Pan Jianjun. Soil available water capacity and its empirical and statistical models-with special reference to black soils in Northeast China[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources & Environment, 2003, 17(4): 88-95.
[26] 邵雅静, 杨悦, 员学锋. 黄河流域城镇化与生态系统服务的时空互动关系[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(3): 86-93, 99. Shao Yajing, Yang Yue, Yun Xuefeng. Analysis of the spatial and temporal interactions between urbanization and ecosystem services in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 36(3): 86-93, 99.
[27] 张佳田, 焦文献, 韩宝龙. 城镇化与生态系统服务的协调演化特征及空间耦合关系[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(10): 3271-3282. Zhang Jiatian, Jiao Wenxian, Han Baolong. Characteristics of coordination changes and spatial coupling relationship between urbanization and ecosystem services[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(10): 3271-3282.
[28] 吴淼, 米炜嵩, 康琦, 等. 黄河流域中上游地区城镇化发展对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 国土资源科技管理, 2025, 42(2): 131-144. Wu Miao, Mi Weisong, Kang Qi, et al. Influence of urbanization development on ecosystem service value in the middle and upper reaches of the Yellow River Basin[J]. Scientific and Technological Management of Land and Resources, 2025, 42(2): 131-144.
[29] 董豆豆, 杨旭, 李春意, 等. 河南省城镇化与生态系统服务的时空耦合协调关系[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2025, 44(6): 57-66. Dong Doudou, Yang Xu, Li Chunyi, et al. Spatio-temporal coupling and coordination relationship between urbanization and ecosystem services in Henan Province[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2025, 44(6): 57-66.
[30] 梁龙武, 王振波, 方创琳, 等. 京津冀城市群城市化与生态环境时空分异及协同发展格局[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(4): 1212-1225. Liang Longwu, Wang Zhenbo, Fang Chuanglin, et al. Spatiotemporal differentiation and coordinated development pattern of urbanization and the ecological environment of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(4): 1212-1225.
[31] 林一诚, 周怡宁, 郑景明. 基于MCR模型的围场县小滦河流域生态安全格局识别[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2024, 46(5): 26-36. Lin Yicheng, Zhou Yining, Zheng Jingming. Identification of ecological security pattern of Xiaoluanhe River Basin in Weichang County, Hebei Province of northern China based on MCR model[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024, 46(5): 26-36.
[32] 袁滈, 汤弟伟, 刘恒, 等. 武陵山区生态系统服务动态演变及其驱动因素的交互效应[J]. 环境科学, 2026, 47(1): 431-443. Yuan Hao, Tang Diwei, Liu Heng, et al. Dynamics evolution and driving factors interaction effects of ecosystem services in the Wuling Mountain area[J]. Environmental Science, 2026, 47(1): 431-443.
[33] Luo R, Yang S L, Zhou Y, et al. Spatial pattern analysis of a water-related ecosystem service and evaluation of the grassland-carrying capacity of the Heihe River Basin under land use change[J]. Water, 2021, 13(19): 2658.
[34] 安志英, 孙才志, 郝帅. 我国东北生态系统服务供需匹配关系:基于水-能源-粮食纽带视角[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(10): 4170-4186. An Zhiying, Sun Caizhi, Hao Shuai. Matching relationship between supply and demand of ecosystem services from the perspective of water-energy-food nexus in Northeast China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, 44(10): 4170-4186.
[35] 杨洋, 李春燕, 刘智勇, 等. 顾及空间尺度的张家界市生态系统服务对城镇化的动态响应关系[J/OL]. 环境科学. https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202508193. Yang Yang, Li Chunyan, Liu Zhiyong, et al. Dynamic response of Zhangjiajie ecosystem services to urbanization considering spatial scale[J/OL]. Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202508193.
[36] 魏泽锋, 官云兰, 王淑婷, 等. “呼包鄂”城市群生态环境质量时空演变及驱动因素分析[J]. 环境科学, 2025, 46(11): 7172-7185. Wei Zefeng, Guan Yunlan, Wang Shuting, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution and driving factors of ecological quality in the “Hohhot-Baotou-Ordos” urban agglomeration[J]. Environmental Science, 2025, 46(11): 7172-7185.
[37] 李思雅, 梁伟, 吕一河, 等. 黄河流域经济发展与生态环境压力的脱钩关系及其驱动效应分析[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(13): 5417-5431. Li Siya, Liang Wei, Lü Yihe, et al. Decoupling relationship and driving effect between eco-environmental pressure in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(13): 5417-5431.
[38] 田一聪, 田明, 李鹏, 等. 西藏自治区城镇化与生态系统服务协调发展研究[J]. 地理科学进展, 2023, 42(10): 1947-1960. Tian Yicong, Tian Ming, Li Peng, et al. Coordinated development of urbanization and ecosystem services in Tibet Autonomous Region[J]. Progress in Geography, 2023, 42(10): 1947-1960.
[39] Zhang Z, Wang Q, Yan F Q, et al. Revealing spatio-temporal differentiations of ecological supply-demand mismatch among cities using ecological Network: a case study of typical cities in the “Upstream-Midstream-Downstream” of the Yellow River Basin[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2024, 166: 112468.
[40] Li R P, Xu Q R, Yu J, et al. Multiscale assessment of the spatiotemporal coupling relationship between urbanization and ecosystem service value along an urban-rural gradient: a case study of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2024, 160: 111864.
[41] 张胜武, 葛宇梦, 李小胜, 等. 黄河流域新型城镇化与水生态环境耦合协调的时空格局及影响因素[J]. 中国沙漠, 2024, 44(3): 172-181. Zhang Shengwu, Ge Yumeng, Li Xiaosheng, et al. Spatio-temporal pattern and influencing factors of the coupling coordination of new urbanization and water ecological environment in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2024, 44(3): 172-181.
[42] 孙金欣, 韩美, 孔凡彪, 等. 黄河下游生境质量与城市化的耦合研究[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2024, 59(11): 110-125. Sun Jinxin, Han Mei, Kong Fanbiao, et al. A coupling study of habitat quality and urbanization in the lower Yellow River[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Natural Science), 2024, 59(11): 110-125.
[43] 程鹏, 王灏, 吴诗嫚, 等. 新型城镇化与耕地利用碳排放空间交互与脱钩效应分析: 以长江经济带三大城市群为例[J]. 生态经济, 2025, 41(7): 101-114. Cheng Peng, Wang Hao, Wu Shiman, et al. Analysis ofspatial interaction and decoupling effect between new-type urbanization and carbon emissions from cultivated land utilization: a case study of three major urban agglomerations in the Yangtze River economic belt[J]. Ecological Economy, 2025, 41(7): 101-114.
[44] 孙斌, 姜慧敏, 薛建春, 等. 黄河流域城市群水资源可持续发展评价及其障碍因素研究[J]. 中国环境管理, 2025, 17(1): 66-77. Sun Bin, Jiang Huimin, Xue Jianchun, et al. Evaluation andobstacle factors of sustainable development level of water resources in urban agglomerations of the Yellow River Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 2025, 17(1): 66-77.
[45] Diao Y X, Xia J, Dong Q J, et al. A water-carbon-economic model coupling system dynamics and InVEST for Wuhans sustainability assessment[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2025, 178: 113893.
[46] Zhang P W, Huang A N, Wu L, et al. A multi-agent simulation-based decision support tool for sustainable tourism land use planning in rural China[J]. Land, 2025, 14(12): 2342.
[47] 周锐, 苏海龙, 王新军, 等. CLUE-S模型对村镇土地利用变化的模拟与精度评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2012, 21(2): 174-180. Zhou Rui, Su Hailong, Wang Xinjun, et al. Simulation andaccuracy assessment of village land use change based on CLUE-S model[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2012, 21(2): 174-180.
[48] 陈绮桐, 林锦耀. 多情景下珠江三角洲地区土地利用变化对生态系统服务的影响预测[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2024, 40(5): 612-621. Chen Qitong, Lin Jinyao. Prediction of theimpact of land use change on ecosystem service in the Pearl River Delta under different scenarios[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2024, 40(5): 612-621.
[49] Ji L, Qi Y J, Jiang Q O, et al. Spatial-temporal variations of the gross ecosystem product under the influence of the spatial spillover effect of urbanization and ecological construction in the Yangtze River Delta Region of China[J]. Land, 2024, 13(6): 778.
[50] 赵煜, 王文仪. 基于空间关联网络结构探究黄河上游城市群生态安全演化特征及影响因素[J]. 湖北民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 42(3): 409-418. Zhao Yu, Wang Wenyi. Characteristics andinfluencing factors of ecological security evolution in the upper Yellow River city cluster based on spatial linkage network structure[J]. Journal of Hubei Minzu University(Natural Science Edition), 2024, 42(3): 409-418.
[1] 贾瑞萱,史兴民,樊怡. 农户生计转型对生态系统服务依赖度的非线性影响——以矿农复合区为例[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2026, 61(10): 46-58.
[2] 闫姝婉,刘建. 黄河流域生态系统服务供需及生态价值的变化[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2026, 61(10): 59-71.
[3] 孙金欣,韩美,孔凡彪,魏帆. 黄河下游生境质量与城市化的耦合研究[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(11): 110-125.
[4] 余娇,杨鸿辉,陈榕榕,丁铮. 生态城市城镇化与生态环境耦合协调时空分异[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2022, 57(11): 102-110.
[5] 陈浩,王仁卿,刘建. 黄河三角洲城市土地利用与生态环境耦合关系[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2019, 54(7): 11-20.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!