您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(理学版)》

《山东大学学报(理学版)》 ›› 2025, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (6): 31-44.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.0.2024.254

• • 上一篇    

考虑碳减排和双向公平关切的供应链复杂性研究

王晶,葛彤彤,司凤山*   

  1. 安徽财经大学管理科学与工程学院, 安徽 蚌埠 233030
  • 发布日期:2025-06-20
  • 通讯作者: 司凤山(1981— ),男,副教授,硕士生导师,博士,研究方向为物流与供应链管理、系统稳定性. E-mail:sifs2007@126.com
  • 作者简介:王晶(1981— ),女,副教授,硕士生导师,博士,研究方向为供应链管理、系统复杂性. E-mail:crystalstella@126.com*通信作者:司凤山(1981— ),男,副教授,硕士生导师,博士,研究方向为物流与供应链管理、系统稳定性. E-mail:sifs2007@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省高校科研计划资助项目(2022AH050589,2024AH052067);安徽省哲学社会科学规划资助项目(AHSKYY2023D009)

Research on complexity of supply chain considering carbon emission reduction and two-way fairness concerns

WANG Jing, GE Tongtong, SI Fengshan*   

  1. School of Management Science and Engineering, Anhui University of Finance and Economics, Bengbu 233030, Anhui, China
  • Published:2025-06-20

摘要: 在碳排放约束政策下,针对考虑制造商和零售商双向公平关切的双渠道供应链的复杂性问题,通过构建多周期动态博弈模型,从系统复杂性的视角,分析决策变量调整速度、公平关切程度和碳交易价格等因素对供应链决策和利润的影响,揭示经济系统的演化行为并对混沌系统实施控制。研究发现,过高的制造商和零售商决策变量调整速度会导致系统经倍周期分岔陷入混沌状态;处于主导地位的零售商有能力影响供应链系统的整体稳定性,跟随者地位的制造商则仅能影响系统局部范围的稳定性;不论是制造商还是零售商,导致系统混沌对自身不利,但对方会获益;公平关切和碳交易价格能够影响供应链成员的利润,但影响程度取决于系统所处的稳定状态;提出参数调整控制法对混沌系统实施有效控制,使其重返稳定状态。

关键词: 碳减排, 双向公平关切, 双渠道供应链, 系统复杂性, 混沌控制

Abstract: Under carbon emission constraints, this paper addresses the complexity of a dual-channel supply chain with bidirectional fairness concerns between manufacturers and retailers. A multi-period dynamic game model is developed to analyze the effects of decision-variable adjustment speed, fairness concern intensity, and carbon trading price on supply chain decision-making and profitability from a systemic complexity perspective. The research reveals the evolutionary behavior of the economic system and proposes chaos control strategies. Key findings include: Excessively high adjustment speeds in decision variables can induce a chaotic state in the system via period-doubling bifurcation. A dominant retailer influences the overall stability of the supply chain, whereas a follower manufacturer only affects local stability. System chaos harms the party causing it but benefits the other. Fairness concerns and carbon pricing impact member profits, though the extent depends on system stability. A parameter-based control method is proposed to effectively suppress chaos and restore stability.

Key words: carbon emission reduction, two-way fairness concerns, dual-channel supply chain, system complexity, chaos control

中图分类号: 

  • F273
[1] UNFCCC. Glasgow climate pact[C] //Decisions adopted by the conference of the parties serving asthe meeting of the Parties to the Paris agreement. Glasgow: United Nations, 2021:2-10.
[2] WU Y, ZHANG D Z. Demand fluctuation and chaoticbehaviour by interaction between customers and suppliers[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2007, 107(1):250-259.
[3] 李卓群,严广乐. 不确定需求下带约束供应链系统复杂动态行为分析[J]. 控制与决策,2016,31(1):173-179. LI Zhuoqun, YAN Guangle. Analysis of complex dynamics behaviors in constrained supply chain system under uncertain demand process[J]. Control and Decision, 2016, 31(1):173-179.
[4] 依不拉音·吾斯曼,郭文强,阿布都热合曼·卡的儿, 等. 专业零售商与厂家直售商的多渠道供应价格博弈的混沌动力学研究[J]. 运筹与管理,2019,28(11):54-59. YIBULAYIN Wusiman, GUO Wenqiang, ABUDOUREHEMAN Kadier, et al. Research on chaotic dynamics of multi-channel supply chain price game between professional retailers and factory direct sellers[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(11):54-59.
[5] HWARNG H B, XIE N. Understanding supply chain dynamics:a chaos perspective[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 184(3):1163-1178.
[6] 戴道明,王忆都. “双碳”目标下多周期供应链政府补贴、碳减排与定价协调研究[J/OL]. 计算机集成制造系统. https://doi.org/10.13196/j.cims.2023.0372. DAI Daoming, WANG Yidu. Coordination of government subsidies, carbon emission reduction and pricing in multi-cycle supply chain under “dual-carbon” target[J/OL]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems.https://doi.org/10.13196/j.cims.2023.0372.
[7] 唐书传,刘云志,肖条军. 考虑社会责任的供应链定价与碳减排决策[J]. 中国管理科学,2020,28(4):99-108. TANG Shuchuan, LIU Yunzhi, XIAO Tiaojun. Pricing and carbon emission reduction decisions in A socially responsible supply chain[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(4):99-108.
[8] CHE C, ZHENG H X, GENG X, et al. Research on carbon emission reduction investment decision of power energy supply chain: based on the analysis of carbon trading and carbon subsidy policies[J]. Energies, 2022, 15(17):6151.
[9] XIA J, NIU W J. Carbon-reducing contract design for a supply chain with environmental responsibility under asymmetric information[J]. Omega, 2021, 102:102390.
[10] 刘名武,樊宝丹,邹梓琛. 碳税政策下制造商碳标签选择策略[J/OL]. 山东大学学报(理学版). https://link.cnki.net/urlid/37.1389.N.20240912.1707.002. LIU Mingwu, FAN Baodan, ZOU Zichen. Carbon tax policy and manufacturers carbon labeling strategy[J/OL]. Journal of Shandong University(Natural Science). https://link.cnki.net/urlid/37.1389.N.20240912.1707.002.
[11] 张云丰,尚钱龙,龚本刚,等. 碳标签制度下三级供应链定价与碳减排决策[J]. 系统工程学报, 2022, 37(2):242-262. ZHANG Yunfeng, SHANG Qianlong, GONG Bengang, et al. Pricing and carbon emission reduction decisions in three-echelon supply chain under carbon labelling system[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2022, 37(2):242-262.
[12] 刘培德,李西娜,李佳路. 碳配额交易机制下竞争企业低碳技术扩散: 基于复杂网络的演化博弈分析[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2024,44(2):684-699. LIU Peide, LI Xina, LI Jialu. Diffusion of low-carbon technology of competitive enterprises under carbon quota trading mechanism: evolutionary game analysis based on complex network[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2024, 44(2):684-699.
[13] TOPTAL A, ÖZLÜ H, KONUR D. Joint decisions on inventory replenishment and emission reduction investment under different emission regulations[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2014, 52(1):243-269.
[14] FAN X S, CHEN K L, CHEN Y J. Is price commitment a better solution to control carbon emissions and promote technology investment?[J]. Management Science, 2023, 69(1):325-341.
[15] 毋博,周建亨. 需求和碳交易价格不确定性下的供应链碳减排激励[J/OL]. 中国管理科学. https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.2686. WU Bo, ZHOU Jianheng. Incentives for carbon emission reduction in supply chains under the uncertainty of demand and carbon trading prices[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Management Science. https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.2686.
[16] 王道平,殷悦,朱梦影. 基于不同碳配额交易路径的供应链减排决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理,2024,33(5):35-41. WANG Daoping, YIN Yue, ZHU Mengying. Research on supply chain emission reduction decisions based on different carbon quota trading paths[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2024, 33(5):35-41.
[17] 夏西强,朱庆华,武晓晴. 政府碳税与补贴政策对独立再制造模式的影响[J]. 系统工程学报,2024,39(4):629-640. XIA Xiqiang, ZHU Qinghua, WU Xiaojing. Impact of government carbon-tax and subsidy policy on independent remanufacturing[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2024, 39(4):629-640.
[18] CUI T H T, RAJU J S, ZHANG J Z. Fairness and channel coordination[J]. Management Science, 2007, 53(8):1303-1314.
[19] 杜少甫,杜婵,梁樑,等. 考虑公平关切的供应链契约与协调[J]. 管理科学学报,2010,13(11):41-48. DU Shaofu, DU Chan, LIANG Liang, et al. Supply chain coordination considering fairness concerns[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2010, 13(11):41-48.
[20] 王磊,成克河,王世伟. 考虑公平关切的双渠道供应链定价策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2012,20(S2):563-568. WANG Lei, CHENG Kehe, WANG Shiwei. Research on pricing strategy of dual-channel supply chain considering fairness concerns[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2012, 20(S2):563-568.
[21] 周艳菊,鲍茂景,陈晓红,等. 基于公平关切的低碳供应链广告合作-减排成本分担契约与协调[J]. 中国管理科学,2017,25(2):121-129. ZHOU Yanju, BAO Maojing, CHEN Xiaohong, et al. Co-op advertising and emission reduction cost sharing contract and coordination in low-carbon supply chain based on fairness concerns[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(2):121-129.
[22] 曹晓刚,曹博威,闻卉. 考虑公平关切的混合回收渠道闭环供应链决策研究[J/OL]. 中国管理科学. https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2023.0619. CAO Xiaogang, CAO Bowei, WEN Hui. Research on closed-loop supply chain decision-making of mixed recycling channels considering fairness concerns[J/OL]. China Industrial Economics.https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2023.0619.
[23] 徐扬,吴阳,吕建成,等. 考虑消费者公平关切行为的众筹定价策略[J].系统工程学报,2024,39(5):767-781. XU Yang, WU Yang, Lü Jiancheng, et al. Crowdfunding pricing strategies considering consumers fairness concern behaviors [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2024, 39(5):767-781.
[24] 韩同银,刘丽,金浩. 考虑政府补贴和公平关切的双渠道绿色供应链决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(4):194-204. HAN Tongyin, LIU Li, JIN Hao. Research on dual-channel green supply chain decision making considering government subsidy and fairness concerns[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(4):194-204.
[25] 李庆颖,朱晨,马曼琼. 考虑公平关切和产能投入的半导体供应链生产与采购决策研究[J]. 系统工程,2025,43(2):65-81. LI Qingying, ZHU Chen, MA Manqiong. Research on production and purchasing decision of semiconductor supply chain considering equity concern and capacity input[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2025, 43(2):65-81.
[26] 吴江,彭扬,邹黎敏,等. 不确定性因素影响下的混沌供应链系统脉冲同步策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2023,31(11):80-89. WU Jiang, PENG Yang, ZOU Limin, et al. Research on impulsive synchronization strategy of chaotic supply chain system under the influence of uncertain factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(11):80-89.
[27] 董海,徐德珉. 三渠道回收模式下闭环供应链混沌控制研究[J]. 复杂系统与复杂性科学,2020,17(1):55-61, 80. DONG Hai, XU Demin. Research on chaos and control of closed-loop supply chain under three channel recovery modes[J]. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 2020, 17(1):55-61, 80.
[28] 于世海, 陈光春. 复杂系统视角下供应链模型动力学仿真研究[J]. 计算机仿真,2016,33(4):328-331, 347. YU Shihai, CHEN Guangchun. Research on supply chain models and its dynamical characteristics simulation based on complex system theory[J]. Computer Simulation, 2016, 33(4):328-331, 347.
[29] CHEN J X, ZHENG J H, ZHANG T H, et al. Dynamical complexity of pricing and green level for a dyadic supply chain with capital constraint[J]. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 2022, 195:1-21.
[30] MA J H, SI F S, ZHANG Q, et al. Impact of extended warranty service on product pricing in online direct retailers' competitive market[J]. Energy Economics, 2024, 129:107217.
[31] MA J H, WANG Z X. Optimal pricing and complex analysis for low-carbon apparel supply chains[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2022, 111:610-629.
[32] 郑清,阿布都热合曼·卡的尔. 碳税机制下考虑不同低碳策略的动态博弈模型及复杂性研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(4):55-60. ZHENG Qing, ARBudureheman Kader.Research on dynamic game model and complexity considering different low-carbon strategies under carbon tax mechanism[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2022, 31(4):55-60.
[33] 李秋香,张玉豪,黄毅敏,等. 考虑不同商业目标和公平关切的动态博弈模型及复杂性研究[J]. 运筹与管理,2019,28(1):35-45. LI Qiuxiang, ZHANG Yuhao, HUANG Yimin, et al. Complexity analysis for dynamic game model with fair-caring and different business objectives[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(1):35-45.
[34] YANG L, ZHANG Q, JI J N. Pricing and carbon emission reduction decisions in supply chains with vertical and horizontal cooperation[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2017, 191:286-297.
[35] 吉清凯,方刚,赵达. 有限产能直销优先策略下双渠道供应链的定价博弈模型[J]. 中国管理科学,2022,30(4):184-193. JI Qingkai, FANG Gang, ZHAO Da. Pricing game of dual-channel supply chains under the “capacity for direct-channel first” policy[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(4):184-193.
[36] LI G, LI L, SUN J S. Pricing and service effort strategy in a dual-channel supply chain withshowrooming effect[J]. Transportation Research Part E:Logistics and Transportation Review, 2019, 126:32-48.
[37] 邹清明,胡李庆,邹霆钧. 碳限额与碳交易机制下考虑公平关切的供应链定价与协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2022,30(10):142-154. ZHOU Qingming, HU Liqing, ZHOU Tingjun. Carbon cap and trade mechanism: pricing and coordination of supply chains with fairness concerns[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(10):142-154.
[38] TIAN Y, MA J H, XIE L, et al. Coordination and control of multi-channel supply chain driven by consumers channel preference and sales effort[J]. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2020, 132:109576.
[39] MA J H, REN H. The impact of variable cost on a dynamic Cournot-Stackelberg game with two decision-making stages[J]. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 2018, 62:184-201.
[40] CHEN X L, ZHOU J H. The complexity analysis and chaos control inomni-channel supply chain with consumer migration and advertising cost sharing[J]. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2021, 146:110884.
[1] 徐兵,杨素芬. 政府补贴和企业履责下平台供应链定价与减排研究[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2025, 60(6): 1-17.
[2] 郭婷婷,吴正祥. 不同权力结构下考虑制造商在线推介的双渠道供应链均衡[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2023, 58(11): 104-115.
[3] 许明星,李雪琴. 双向搭便车行为下双渠道供应链统一定价和服务决策[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2022, 57(9): 55-70.
[4] 司凤山,王晶,戴道明. 考虑服务质量和延迟决策的双渠道供应链演化博弈分析[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2020, 55(1): 86-93, 101.
[5] 曹慧荣,周伟,褚童,周洁. 政府征税与补贴Bertrand博弈模型的动力学分析[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2019, 54(11): 52-62.
[6] 陈良,胡劲松. 风险规避对不同类型双渠道供应链决策的影响[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2018, 53(5): 30-40.
[7] 程茜,汪传旭,徐朗. 考虑利他偏好的低碳供应链决策[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2018, 53(5): 41-52.
[8] 鞠培军. 广义Lorenz系统全局稳定的充要条件及其在混沌控制中的应用[J]. J4, 2012, 47(10): 97-101.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!