您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（理学版）》

山东大学学报（理学版） ›› 2017, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (6): 10-15.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.0.2017.129

• • 上一篇    下一篇

市场定价约束条件下的供应链质量改进容错决策

钟元1,熊爽2,张翠华2*,陈彗洁2   

  1. 1. 中国海洋大学管理学院, 山东 青岛 266100;2. 东北大学工商管理学院, 辽宁 沈阳 110167
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-31 出版日期:2017-06-20 发布日期:2017-06-21
  • 通讯作者: 张翠华(1971— ),女,博士,教授,主要从事供应链质量控制研究.E-mail:chzhang@mail.neu.edu.cn E-mail:xu-bing99@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(71371043);教育部高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目(20130042110031);辽宁省社科规划基金资助项目(L13BJY023)

Research on fault tolerance strategies of quality improvement in supply chains with market pricing constraints

ZHONG Yuan1, XIONG Shuang2, ZHANG Cui-hua2*, CHEN Hui-jie2   

  1. 1. Management College, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, Shandong, China;
    2. School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110167, Liaoning, China
  • Received:2017-03-31 Online:2017-06-20 Published:2017-06-21

PDF (PC)

531

摘要： 研究了需求不确定条件下具有风险态度的供应链质量改进决策问题,引入了企业风险态度和价值损失函数,建立了供应链质量改进效用函数,分析了市场定价条件下集成供应链与分散供应链的质量改进活动,分别建立了制造商和供应商的效用质量模型并以效用最大化为目标进行优化,得到了不同情形下应对风险的质量改进容错策略。最后,运用Mathematica 5.0软件进行算例仿真,验证了模型的有效性。

关键词: 容错决策, 供应链, 质量改进, 风险态度, 市场定价

Abstract: This paper concerns on the strategies of quality improvementin supply chains with risk attitude when customers demand is uncertain. To achieve this goal, the functions of the enterprise risk attitude and value loss were introduced and the utility functions of quality improvement in supply chains were established. Through this analysis, the activities of quality improvement in integrated and decentralized supply chains with market pricingconstraints can be used as the bases of establishing the utility-quality models for manufacturers and suppliers respectively. These models can help people obtainthe fault tolerance strategies of quality improvement at risk in different situations and maximize the utility. At the last stage of this research, a software named Mathematica 5.0 will be used to test the availability of these models.

Key words: supply chain, fault tolerance strategy, market pricing, risk attitude, quality improvement

中图分类号: 

  • F274
[1] ALTUG M S, RYZIN G. Product quality selection: contractual agreements and supplier competition in an assemble-to-order environment [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 141(2):626-638.
[2] TSE Y K, TAN K H. Managing product quality risk and visibility in multi-layer supply chain[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, 139(1):49-57.
[3] TSE Y K, TAN K H. Managing product quality risk in a multi-tier global supply chain[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2011, 49(1):139-158.
[4] PEDERSEN S N, HOWARD T. Data acquisition for quality loss function modelling[J]. Procedia Cirp, 2016, 43:112-117.
[5] XIE G, YUE W Y, WANG S Y. Quality investment and price decision in a risk-averse supply chain [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 214(2): 403-410.
[6] XIE G, WANG S Y, LAI K K. Quality improvement in competing supply chains[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2011, 134(1): 262-270.
[7] GINO F, PISANO G. Toward a theory of behavioral operations [J]. Manufacturing Service Operations Management, 2008, 10(4): 676-691.
[8] 刘咏梅,李立,刘洪莲. 行为供应链研究综述[J]. 中南大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 11(1):80-88. LIU Yongmei, LI Li, LIU Honglian. Behavioral supply chain management review[J]. Journal of Central South University(Social Science Edition), 2011, 11(1):80-88.
[9] 孟庆峰,盛昭瀚,李真. 基于公平偏好的供应链质量激励机制效率演化[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2012,32(11): 2394-2403. MENG Qingfeng, SHENG Zhaohan, LI Zhen. Efficiency evolution of quality incentive in supply chain based on fairness preference[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2012,32(11): 2394-2403.
[10] 刘作仪, 查勇.行为运作管理: 一个正在显现的研究领域[J]. 管理科学学报, 2009, 12(4): 64-74. LIU Zuoyi, CHA Yong. Behavioral operations management: an emerging research field[J].Journal of Management Science, 2009, 12(4):64-74.
[11] 崔崟,陈剑,肖勇波.行为库存管理研究综述及前景展望[J]. 管理科学学报, 2011, 14(6): 96-108. CUI Yin, CHEN Jian, XIAO Yongbo. Behavioral inventory management: research overview and prospects[J].Journal of Management Science, 2011, 14(6): 96-108.
[12] LI K J, JAIN S.Behavior-based pricing: an analysis of the impact of peer-induced fairness[J]. Management Science, 2016,62(9):2705-2721.
[13] BEN AMARA S, DHAHRI J, BEN FREDJ N. Process true capability evaluation with the consideration of measurement system variability and expected quality loss[J]. Quality & Reliability Engineering International, 2016.
[14] ZHANG J, LI W, WANG K, et al. Process adjustment with an asymmetric quality loss function[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2014, 33(1):159-165.
[15] CHUNG H, LEE E. Asymmetric relationships with symmetric suppliers: strategic choice of supply chain price leadership in a competitive market [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 259:564-575.
[16] CHEN J, LIANG L, YAO D Q, et al. Price and quality decisions in dual-channel supply chains[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 259:564-575.
[1] 张克勇,李江鑫,姚建明,李春霞. 竞争型零售商具公平敏感性的供应链决策[J]. 山东大学学报（理学版）, 2018, 53(9): 83-94.
[2] 陈良,胡劲松. 风险规避对不同类型双渠道供应链决策的影响[J]. 山东大学学报（理学版）, 2018, 53(5): 30-40.
[3] 刘京,周岩,郑英杰,王超胜. 考虑零售商公平关切和风险规避的绿色供应链最优决策[J]. 山东大学学报（理学版）, 2018, 53(5): 12-29.
[4] 肖迪,金雯雯. C2B电商情境下考虑横向竞争的供应链定价策略[J]. 山东大学学报（理学版）, 2018, 53(5): 53-60.
[5] 段丁钰,周岩,张华民,徐明姣. 考虑零售商不公平厌恶行为的供应链网络均衡研究[J]. 山东大学学报（理学版）, 2017, 52(5): 58-69.
[6] 何新华,胡文发,许长延,陈继红. 考虑随机性与模糊性的应急服务供应链转运策略[J]. 山东大学学报（理学版）, 2016, 51(12): 67-77.
[7] 何新华, 胡文发, 肖敏. 突发事件下应急服务供应链的期权协同决策[J]. 山东大学学报（理学版）, 2015, 50(11): 81-90.
[8] 罗海燕, 吕萍, 刘林忠, 杨洵. 云环境下基于模糊粗糙AHP的企业信任综合评估[J]. 山东大学学报（理学版）, 2014, 49(08): 111-117.
[9] 周岩, 孙浩, 王晶晶, 韩瑞京, 蒋京龙. 基于随机需求和顾客满意度的多期闭环供应链网络均衡[J]. 山东大学学报（理学版）, 2014, 49(07): 38-49.
[10] 王婷1,崔玉泉2,赵岗1. 随机需求下考虑退货机制的零售商竞争协调模型[J]. J4, 2013, 48(6): 34-37.
[11] 张克勇1,吴燕1,侯世旺2. 零售商公平关切下闭环供应链定价策略研究[J]. J4, 2013, 48(05): 83-91.
[12] 徐兵,熊勇. 需求依赖库存量的n-2型供应链网络决策模型研究[J]. J4, 2012, 47(12): 14-21.
[13] 汪传旭1,蒋良奎2. 模糊随机需求条件下供应链定期库存订货策略研究[J]. J4, 2011, 46(7): 48-55.
[14] 陆媛媛. 零售商竞争下的合作广告策略与订货策略[J]. J4, 2011, 46(1): 71-78.
[15] 张克勇1,2,周国华1. 非对称信息下闭环供应链差别定价协调机制[J]. J4, 2009, 44(2): 60-64.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(理学版)》编辑部　
地址: 山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区（250100）　电话: +86-0531-88366917　E-mail: xblxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发