您的位置:山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报(理学版)》

《山东大学学报(理学版)》 ›› 2026, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (1): 76-84.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.5.2025.118

• • 上一篇    下一篇

白蚁分区式微方向感知的精确形态识别

邹峥1,雷雨晟1,刘石坚2,王定一3,邱学炜1,史雯雯2,周校通2   

  1. 1.福建师范大学计算机与网络空间安全学院, 福建 福州 350117;2.福建省大数据挖掘与应用技术重点实验室(福建理工大学), 福建 福州 350118;3.福建师范大学地理科学学院, 福建 福州 350117
  • 出版日期:2026-01-20 发布日期:2026-01-15
  • 作者简介:邹峥(1984— ),女,讲师,博士,研究方向为图像处理、模式识别、机器学习. E-mail:zouzheng2018@fjnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(62172095);福建省自然科学基金资助项目(2025J01670,2023J01515)

Precise morphological recognition with zonal micro-direction for termites

ZOU Zheng1, LEI Yusheng1, LIU Shijian2, WANG Dingyi3, QIU Xuewei1, SHI Wenwen2, ZHOU Xiaotong2   

  1. 1. College of Computer and Cyber Security, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, Fujian, China;
    2. Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Big Data Mining and Applications(Fujian University of Technology), Fuzhou 350118, Fujian, China;
    3. School of Geographical Sciences, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, Fujian, China
  • Online:2026-01-20 Published:2026-01-15

摘要: 提出分区式微方向感知的自动形态分析方法,采用分区式思想细化目标,间接增加形态差异的显著性。选择旋转矩形表征目标和更多方向信息,在识别时引入多层局部空间感知模块,将方向与特征直接关联,同时融合双支空间金字塔模块,强化浅层特征复用,提高了计算效率。将主流旋转目标检测方法、关键点检测方法与本文方法对比,结果证明在提取高干扰的小目标的方向和位置方面,本文方法具有更好的精确度和鲁棒性。

关键词: 白蚁形态测量, 旋转目标检测, 关键点检测, 物种鉴定, 自动形态识别

Abstract: The partition-based approach is used in the paper to refine the target by indirectly enhancing the salience of morphological differences. Rotational moment-based representation is provided more directional information, and a multi-layer local spatial perception module is incorporated to directly associate direction with features. Furthermore, a dual-branch spatial pyramid module is introduced to enhance the reuse of shallow features and improve computational efficiency. In our experiments, the rotational object detection method, the key point detection method, and the proposed method are compared, and it is demonstrated that our method achieves better accuracy and robustness in extracting the direction and position of small targets under higher interference.

Key words: measurement of termite morphology, oriented object detection, key point detection, species identification, automatic morphology recognition

中图分类号: 

  • TP391
[1] 黄复生,朱世模,平正明,等. 中国动物志(昆虫纲)[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2000:1-961. HUANG Fusheng, ZHU Shimo, PING Zhengming, et al. Fauna sinica(insecta)[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2000:1-961.
[2] 白明,杨星科. 三维几何形态学概述及其在昆虫学中的应用[J]. 昆虫学报,2014,57(9):1105-1111. BAI Ming, YANG Xingke. A review of three-dimensional(3D)geo-metric morphometrics and its application in entomology[J]. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 2014, 57(9):1105-1111.
[3] HOANG H N, HAI B H, PHUONG H L, et al. A lightweight keypoint matching framework for insect wing morphometric landmark detection[J]. Ecological Informatics, 2022, 70:101694.
[4] JOÃO P R, WALTER G, ALICE M P. Automatic wing geometric morphometrics classification of honey bee(apis mellifera)subspecies using deep learning for detecting land-marks[J]. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 2022, 6(3):70-70.
[5] WANG Zejun, ZHANG Shihao, CHEN Lijiao, et al. Microscopic insect pest detection in tea plantations: improved YOLOv8 model based on deep learning[J]. Agriculture, 2024, 14(10):1739.
[6] BERECIARTUA-PÉREZ A, GOMEZ L, PICON A, et al. Insect counting through deep learning-based density maps estimation[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2022, 197:106933.
[7] BUSCHBACHER K, AHRENS D, ESPELAND M, et al. Image-based species identification of wild bees using convolutional neural networks[J]. Ecological Informatics, 2020, 55:101017.
[8] BADGUJAR C M, ARMSTRONG P R, GERKEN A R, et al. Identifying common stored product insects using automated deep learning methods[J]. Journal of Stored Products Research, 2023, 103:102166.
[9] VENEGAS P, CALDERON F, RIOFRÍO D, et al. Automatic ladybird beetle detection using deep-learning models[J]. PLoS One, 2021, 16(6):e0253027.
[10] TETILA E C, MACHADO B B, MENEZES G V, et al. A deep-learning approach for automatic counting of soybean insect pests[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2020, 17(10):1837-1841.
[11] 唐灿,唐亮贵,刘波. 图像特征检测与匹配方法研究综述[J]. 南京信息工程大学学报(自然科学版),2020,12(3):261-273. TANG Can, TANG Lianggui, LIU Bo. A survey of image feature detection and matching methods[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2020, 12(3):261-273.
[12] 江铁,朱桂斌,孙奥,等. 特征点提取算法性能分析研究[J]. 科学技术与工程,2012,12(30):7924-7930. JIANG Tie, ZHU Guibin, SUN Ao, et al. Performance analysis of feature point detectors[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2012, 12(30):7924-7930.
[13] YANG Jieren, ZHANG xinying, LUO Peng. A summary of feature point detection based on image mosaics[J]. Electronic Test, 2021(6):53-54.
[14] LE V, BEURTON-AIMAR M, ZEMMARI A, et al. Automated land-marking for insects morphometric analysis using deep neural networks[J]. Ecological Informatics, 2020, 60:101175.
[15] GELDENHUYS D S, JOSIAS S, BRINK W, et al. Deep learning approaches to landmark detection in tsetse wing images[J]. PLOS Computational Biology, 2023, 19(6):e1011194.
[16] 安胜彪,娄慧儒,陈书旺,等. 基于深度学习的旋转目标检测方法研究进展[J]. 电子测量技术,2021,44(21):168-17. AN Shengbiao, LOU Huiru, CHEN Shuwang, et al. Research progress of rotating target detection methods based on deep learning[J]. Electronic Measurement Technology, 2021, 44(21):168-178.
[17] FELZENSZWALB P F, GIRSHICK R B, MCALLESTER D, et al. Object detection with discriminatively trained part-based models[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2010, 32(9):1627-1645.
[18] 陈天鹏,胡建文. 基于深度学习的遥感图像旋转目标检测研究综述[J]. 计算机应用研究,2024,41(2):329-340. CHEN Tianpeng, HU Jianwen. Overview of oriented object detection based on deep learning in remote sensing[J]. Application Research of Computers, 2024, 41(2):329-340.
[19] LONG Wen, YU Cheng, YI Fang, et al. A comprehensive survey of oriented object detection in remote sensing images[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, 224:16-26.
[20] 王旭,吴艳霞,张雪,等. 计算机视觉下的旋转目标检测研究综述[J]. 计算机科学,2023,50(8):79-92. WANG Xiu, WU Yanxia, ZHANG Xue, et al. Survey of rotating object detection research in computer vision[J]. Computer Science, 2023, 50(8):79-92.
[21] YUAN Shuai, QIN Hanlin, YAN Xiang, et al. Sctransnet: spatial-channel cross transformer network for infrared small target detection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2024, 62(10):1-15.
[22] YANG Zhigang, XIA Xiangyu, LIU Yiming, et al. LPST-Det: local-perception-enhanced swin transformer for sar ship detection[J]. Remote Sensing, 2024, 16(3):18.
[23] KONG Tao, SUN Fuchun, LIU Huaping, et al. Foveabox: beyond anchor-based object detection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2020, 29:7389-7398.
[24] QIAN Wen, YANG Xue, PENG Silong, et al. Learning modulated loss for rotated object detection[EB/OL].(2019-11-09)[2025-08-15]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1911.08299.
[25] HAN Jiaming, DING Jian, LI Jie, et al. Align deep features for oriented object detection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2021, 10(99):1-11.
[26] 中华人民共和国海关总署. SN/T 1105-2019大家白蚁检疫鉴定方法[S]. 北京:中华人民共和国海关总署,2019. General Administration of Customs of the Peoples Republic of China. SN/T 1105-2019 Detection and identification of coptotermes curvignathus Holmgren[S]. Beijing: General Administration of Customs of the Peoples Republic of China, 2019.
[27] HOU Qibin, ZHOU Daquan, FENG Jiashi. Coordinate attention for efficient mobile network design[C] //Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Los Alamitos: IEEE, 2021:13708-13717.
[28] WANG Chenyao, LIAO Hongyuan, WU Yuehua, et al. CSPNET: a new backbone that can enhance learning capability of CNN[C] //Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Los Alamitos: IEEE, 2020:390-404.
[1] 仲尚,马丽,刘文哲,李雨豪. 融合多尺度注意力机制和改进特征融合的轻量化水面小目标检测模型[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2026, 61(1): 15-25.
[2] 余雷,孙懿,华金铭,李腊全. 基于深度神经网络的重症监护室脓毒症患者死亡风险预测模型分析[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2026, 61(1): 26-35.
[3] 孙清,叶军,曾广财,宋苏洋,汪一心. 结合蝙蝠算法和紧密度改进的三支K-means算法[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2026, 61(1): 65-75.
[4] 王军涛,黄强. 基于一般重叠函数的模糊数学形态学边缘检测方法[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2026, 61(1): 36-48.
[5] 孙迪,郭义童,任超,范海峰,张传雷. 基于多尺度特征融合与改进注意力的锈蚀螺栓螺帽检测[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2026, 61(1): 1-14.
[6] 李文焱,李丽红,王洪欣. 基于知识度量的模糊粗糙c-均值算法[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2026, 61(1): 49-64.
[7] 梁霞,郭洁. 基于在线评论的线上教学平台选择方法[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(9): 108-118.
[8] 黎超,廖薇. 基于医疗知识驱动的中文疾病文本分类模型[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(7): 122-130.
[9] 纪杰,孙承杰,单丽莉,尚伯乐,林磊. 基于提示学习的电信网络诈骗案件分类方法[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(7): 113-121.
[10] 罗奇,苟刚. 基于聚类和群组归一化的多模态对话情绪识别[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(7): 105-112.
[11] 赵峰叙,王健,林原,林鸿飞. 面向排序学习的概率分布优化模型[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(7): 95-104.
[12] 黄兴宇,赵明宇,吕子钰. 面向图神经网络表征学习的类别知识探针[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(7): 85-94.
[13] 桂梁,徐遥,何世柱,张元哲,刘康,赵军. 基于动态邻居选择的知识图谱事实错误检测方法[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(7): 76-84.
[14] 咸宁,范意兴,廉涛,郭嘉丰. 融合多重特征的噪声网络对齐方法[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(7): 64-75.
[15] 孙承杰,李宗蔚,单丽莉,林磊. 一种基于核心论元的篇章级事件抽取方法[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(7): 53-63.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 唐风琴1,白建明2. 一类带有广义负上限相依索赔额的风险过程大偏差[J]. J4, 2013, 48(1): 100 -106 .
[2] 王 瑶,刘 建,王仁卿,* . 阿利效应及其对生物入侵和自然保护中小种群管理的启示[J]. J4, 2007, 42(1): 76 -82 .
[3] 王刚,许信顺*. 一种新的基于多示例学习的场景分类方法[J]. J4, 2010, 45(7): 108 -113 .
[4] 陆玮洁,主沉浮,宋 翠,杨艳丽 . 中药郁金中无机离子的毛细管电泳法测定[J]. J4, 2007, 42(7): 13 -18 .
[5] 赵君1,赵晶2,樊廷俊1*,袁文鹏1,3,张铮1,丛日山1. 水溶性海星皂苷的分离纯化及其抗肿瘤活性研究[J]. J4, 2013, 48(1): 30 -35 .
[6] 杨永伟1,2,贺鹏飞2,李毅君2,3. BL-代数的严格滤子[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2014, 49(03): 63 -67 .
[7] 韩亚飞,伊文慧,王文波,王延平,王华田*. 基于高通量测序技术的连作杨树人工林土壤细菌多样性研究[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2014, 49(05): 1 -6 .
[8] 孙小婷1,靳岚2*. DOSY在寡糖混合物分析中的应用[J]. J4, 2013, 48(1): 43 -45 .
[9] 任敏1,2,张光辉1. 右半直线上依分布收敛独立随机环境中随机游动的吸收概率[J]. J4, 2013, 48(1): 93 -99 .
[10] 徐俊峰. 关于复代数微分方程亚纯解的增长级[J]. J4, 2010, 45(6): 91 -93 .