JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE) ›› 2025, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (7): 13-21.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.0.2023.550

Previous Articles    

Method for glioma gene status prediction based on deep truth discovery

ZHAO Yulin, LIANG Fengning, ZHAO Teng, CAO Yaru, WANG Lin, ZHU Hong*   

  1. School of Medical Information and Engineering, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221004, Jiangsu, China
  • Published:2025-07-01

Abstract: Aiming at the problems of incomplete deep network feature extraction and inherent uncertainty of the model in the current deep learning model for the prediction of glioma isocitrate dehydrogenase 1(IDH1)gene status based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging(MRI), the truth discovery divided attention-ResNet(TDA-ResNet)model are proposed based on improved residual network(ResNet)with truth discovery. Firstly, the ResNet network model architecture is optimized by the divided attention mechanism to extract local and global features of glioma images to predict the IDH1 gene status of glioma; meanwhile, the truth discovery algorithm is incorporated into the model to calibrate the uncertainty of the depth feature vectors as the prediction results, so as to improve the prediction accuracy of the model. The experimental data were collected from the MR images of some glioma patients in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University and the public dataset of the cancer imaging archive(TCIA). The experimental accuracies of the TDA-ResNet model in the MR image dataset of glioma in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University and the TCIA dataset were 95.73% and 94.3%. The experimental results show that the TDA-ResNet model can achieve non-invasive prediction and uncertainty calibration of IDH1 gene status of glioma, and its performance is better than the existing deep learning prediction model of IDH1 gene status, which is of great significance for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of glioma.

Key words: glioma, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1, deep learning, truth discovery, uncertainty calibration

CLC Number: 

  • TP391.41
[1] SLEDZINSKA P, BEBYN M, FURTAK J, et al. Current and promising treatment strategies in glioma[J]. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 2022, 34(5):483-516.
[2] LOUIS D N, PERRY A, WESSELING P, et al. The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary[J]. Neuro-Oncology, 2021, 23(8):1231-1251.
[3] XU Jie, XU Fangping, LIU Zhihua, et al. The correlation analysis of TERT promoter mutations with IDH1/2 mutations and 1p/19q detected in human gliomas[J]. Medicine, 2022, 101(29):e29668.
[4] OHBA S, KUWAHARA K, YAMADA S, et al. Correlation between IDH, ATRX, and TERT promoter mutations in glioma[J]. Brain Tumor Pathology, 2020, 37(2):33-40.
[5] LI Yiming, WEI Dong, LIU Xing, et al. Molecular subtyping of diffuse gliomas using magnetic resonance imaging: comparison and correlation between radiomics and deep learning[J]. European Radiology, 2022, 32(2):747-758.
[6] WENG G D, ERMI?瘙塁 E, MARAGKOU T, et al. Accurate prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutation status of gliomas using SLOW-editing magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging at 7 T MR[J]. Neuro-Oncology Advances, 2023, 5(1):vdad001.
[7] XU Qian, XU Qianqian, SHI Nian, et al. A multitask classification framework based on vision transformer for predicting molecular expressions of glioma[J]. European Journal of Radiology, 2022, 157:110560
[8] MA Chunwei, HUANG Ziyun, XIAN Jiayi, et al. Improving uncertainty calibration of deep neural networks via truth discovery and geometric optimization[C] //Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. [S.l.] :PMLR, 2021:75-85.
[9] MURUGESAN B, LIU B Y, GALDRAN A, et al. Calibrating segmentation networks with margin-based label smoothing[J]. Medical Image Analysis, 2023, 87:102826.
[10] BUDDENKOTTE T, ESCUDERO SANCHEZ L, CRISPIN-ORTUZAR M, et al. Calibrating ensembles for scalable uncertainty quantification in deep learning-based medical image segmentation[J]. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2023, 163:107096.
[11] CANT K, EVINS R. Improved calibration of building models using approximate Bayesian calibration and neural networks[J]. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 2023, 16(3):291-307.
[12] SHAFIQ M, GU Z. Deep residual learning for image recognition: a survey[J]. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(18):8972.
[13] XIE S, GIRSHICK R, DOLLÁR P, et al. Aggregated residual transformations for deep neural networks[C] //Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Honolulu: IEEE, 2017:1492-1500.
[14] DING Hu, XU Jinhui. Learning the truth vector in high dimensions[J]. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 2020, 109:78-94.
[15] KUMAR A, LIANG P, MA T. Verified uncertainty calibration[EB/OL].(2019-09-23)[2023-12-29]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1909.10155.
[16] GUO C, PLEISS G, SUN Y, et al. On calibration of modern neural networks[C] //Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning-Volume 70. Sydney: ACM, 2017:1321-1330.
[17] 曹建军,常宸,翁年凤,等. 基于神经网络编码的真值发现[J]. 计算机工程与科学,2021,43(9):1546-1557. CAO Jianjun, CHANG Chen, WENG Nianfeng, et al. Truth discovery based on neural network encoding[J]. Computer Engineering & Science, 2021, 43(9):1546-1557.
[18] XU Haitao, ZHANG Haiwang, LI Qianqian, et al. A data-semantic-conflict-based multi-truth discovery algorithm for a programming site[J]. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2021, 68(2):2681-2691.
[19] CHOI Y S, BAE S, CHANG J H, et al. Fully automated hybrid approach to predict the IDH mutation status of gliomas via deep learning and radiomics[J]. Neuro-Oncology, 2021, 23(2):304-313.
[20] TAHA B, LI T H, BOLEY D, et al. Detection of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutated glioblastomas through anomaly detection analytics[J]. Neurosurgery, 2021, 89(2):323-328.
[21] KAWAGUCHI R K, TAKAHASHI M, MIYAKE M, et al. Assessing versatile machine learning models for glioma radiogenomic studies across hospitals[J]. Cancers, 2021, 13(14):3611.
[1] CHEN Yumin, ZHENG Guangyu, JIAO Na. Multi-label learning based on granular neural networks [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2024, 59(5): 1-11.
[2] Cheng LI,Wengang CHE,Shengxiang GAO. A object detection algorithm for aerial images [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2023, 58(9): 59-70.
[3] Huachang XU,Qian XU,Yulin ZHAO,Fengning LIANG,Kai XU,Hong ZHU. Prediction method of IDH1 mutation status of glioma based on improved EfficientNetV2 [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2023, 58(7): 60-66.
[4] Chengcheng ZHONG,Heng ZHOU,Zitong ZHANG,Chunlei ZHANG. LAC-UNet: semantic segmentation model based on capsules for representing part-whole hierarchical features [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2023, 58(11): 116-126.
[5] Fei-fei XU,Yun-jie XU. Research on matching resumes and positions based on Arc-LSTM [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2021, 56(1): 83-90.
[6] Chang-ying HAO,Yan-yan LAN,Hai-nan ZHANG,Jia-feng GUO,Jun XU,Liang PANG,Xue-qi CHENG. Dialogue generation model based on extended keywords information [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2019, 54(7): 68-76.
[7] LIU Biao, LU Zhe, HUANG Yu-wei, JIAO Meng, LI Quan-qi, XUE Rui. Comparative study on neural network structures in power analysis [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2019, 54(1): 60-66.
[8] PANG Bo, LIU Yuan-chao. Fusion of pointwise and deep learning methods for passage ranking [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2018, 53(3): 30-35.
[9] LIU Ming-ming, ZHANG Min-qing, LIU Jia, GAO Pei-xian. Steganalysis method based on shallow convolution neural network [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2018, 53(3): 63-70.
[10] LIU Ming, ZAN Hong-ying, YUAN Hui-bin. Key sentiment sentence prediction using SVM and RNN [J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2014, 49(11): 68-73.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!