《山东大学学报(理学版)》 ›› 2022, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (8): 60-67.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.0.2022.055
韩培磊1,2,魏玲1,2*,王振1,2,赵思雨1,2,3
HAN Pei-lei1,2, WEI Ling1,2*, WANG Zhen1,2, ZHAO Si-yu1,2,3
摘要: 在形式概念分析中,概念格上的偏序关系刻画了概念间的泛化和特化关系,而概念格中不可比概念之间也存在着值得研究的特定语义信息。受此启发,提出互补概念这一定义并给出其形式化描述。首先,通过给定两个对象子集关于某个特定属性子集互补程度的描述,根据不同实际需求分别定义强、弱互补关系。在此基础上,研究互补概念及相关性质,并在不同语义背景下探究最优强互补概念和最优弱互补概念,给出相应生成算法。最后,通过实例说明所研究内容的合理性与可适用性。
中图分类号:
[1] WILLE R. Restructuring lattice theory: an approach based on hierarchies of concepts[M] //RIVAL I. Ordered Sets. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer, 1982: 445-470. [2] GANTER B, WILLE R. Formal concept analysis: mathematical foundations[M]. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1999. [3] KUZNETSOV S O, OBIEDKOV S A. Comparing performance of algorithms for generating concept lattices[J]. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 2002, 14(2/3):189-216. [4] 曾利程, 张祖平, 邹力耕. 增量式快速构建概念格算法[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2018, 12(11):1862-1870. ZENG Licheng, ZHANG Zuping, ZOU Ligeng. Fast algorithm for incremental construction of concept lattice[J]. Journal of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology, 2018, 12(11):1862-1870. [5] QIAN Ting, WEI Ling, QI Jianjun. Constructing three-way concept lattices based on apposition and subposition of formal contexts[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2017, 116:39-48. [6] LIU Guilong. Attribute reduction algorithms determined by invariants for decision tables[J/OL]. Cognitive Computation, 2021[2022-02-23]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-021-09887-w. [7] ZHANG Wenxiu, WEI Ling, QI Jianjun. Attribute reduction theory and approach to concept lattice[J]. Science in China Series F: Information Science, 2005, 48(6):713-726. [8] WANG Zhen, WEI Ling, QI Jianjun, et al. Attribute reduction of SE-ISI concept lattices for incomplete contexts[J]. Soft Computing, 2020, 24(20):15143-15158. [9] 王振, 魏玲. 基于单边区间集概念格的不完备形式背景的属性约简[J]. 计算机科学, 2018, 45(1):73-78. WANG Zhen, WEI Ling. Attribute reduction of partially-known formal concept lattices for incomplete contexts[J]. Computer Science, 2018, 45(1):73-78. [10] LI Jinhai, MEI Changlin, LV Yuejin. A heuristic knowledge-reduction method for decision formal contexts[J]. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 2010, 61(4):1096-1106. [11] LI Jinhai, MEI Changlin, LV Yuejin. Incomplete decision contexts: approximate concept construction, rule acquisition and knowledge reduction[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2013, 54(1):149-165. [12] 朱治春, 魏玲. 基于类背景的双向规则的获取[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 45(4):517-524. ZHU Zhichun, WEI Ling. Two-way rules acquisition based on class contexts[J]. Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition), 2015, 45(4):517-524. [13] 李金海, 吕跃进. 基于概念格的决策形式背景属性约简及规则提取[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2009, 39(7):182-188. LI Jinhai, LV Yuejin. Attribute reduction and rules extraction in decision formal context based on concept lattice[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2009, 39(7):182-188. [14] HU Zhiyong, SHAO Mingwen, LIU Huan, et al. Cognitive computing and rule extraction in generalized one-sided formal contexts[J/OL]. Cognitive Computation, 2021[2022-02-23]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-021-09868-z. [15] MISSAOUI R, GODIN R, BOUJENOUI A. Extracting exact and approximate rules from databases[C] // Proceedings of SOFTEKS Workshop on Incompleteness and Uncertainty in Information Systems. Berlin: Springer, 1993: 209-222. [16] FREEMAN L C, WHITE D R. Using galois lattices to represent network data[J]. Sociological Methodology, 1993, 23:127-146. [17] 崔晓婕, 许寒冰, 于微微, 等. 基于形式概念分析法研究针灸治疗肩痹选穴规律[J]. 世界中医药, 2021, 16(19):2941-2945. CUI Xiaojie, XU Hanbing, YU Weiwei, et al. Analysis on acupoint selection rules for treatment of shoulder arthralgia by acupuncture and moxibustion based on formal concept analysis[J]. World Chinese Medicine, 2021, 16(19):2941-2945. [18] 张瑞玲, 徐红升, 沈夏炯. 基于偏序关系的子概念格判定算法[J]. 计算机应用与软件, 2008, 25(8):6-7, 64. ZHANG Ruiling, XU Hongsheng, SHEN Xiajiong. Determinant algorithm of sub-concept lattice on partial ordering relation basis[J]. Computer Applications and Software, 2008, 25(8):6-7, 64. [19] 金岳霖. 形式逻辑[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 1979: 34-41. JIN Yuelin. Formal logic[M]. Beijing: Peoples Publishing House, 1979: 34-41. [20] 全国科学技术名词审定委员会. 资源科学技术名词[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008: 203-204. China National Committee for Terminology in Science and Technology. Chinese terms in resource science and technology[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2008: 203-204. [21] QI Jianjun, WEI Ling, YAO Yiyu. Three-way formal concept analysis[C] // International Conference on Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology. Berlin: Springer, 2014: 732-741. |
[1] | 常丽娜, 魏玲. 基于OE-近似概念格的不完备决策背景的规则提取[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2021, 56(11): 31-37. |
[2] | 唐洁,魏玲,任睿思,赵思雨. 基于可能属性分析的粒描述[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2021, 56(1): 75-82. |
[3] | 李双伶,岳晓威,秦克云. 多源形式背景中的粒结构[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2020, 55(5): 46-54. |
[4] | 李金海,贺建君,吴伟志. 多粒度形式概念分析的类属性块优化[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2020, 55(5): 1-12. |
[5] | 刘营营,米据生,梁美社,李磊军. 三支区间集概念格[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2020, 55(3): 70-80. |
[6] | 姬儒雅,魏玲,任睿思,赵思雨. 毕达哥拉斯模糊三支概念格[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2020, 55(11): 58-65. |
[7] | 李粉宁,范敏,李金海. 形式概念分析中面向对象粒概念的动态更新[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2019, 54(4): 105-115. |
[8] | 李金海,吴伟志,邓硕. 形式概念分析的多粒度标记理论[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2019, 54(2): 30-40. |
[9] | 张恩胜. 区间集概念格属性约简的组成与结构[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2018, 53(8): 17-24. |
[10] | 黄桃林,牛娇娇,李金海. 基于粒辨识属性矩阵的动态形式背景约简更新方法[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2017, 52(7): 13-21. |
[11] | 李金海,吴伟志. 形式概念分析的粒计算方法及其研究展望[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2017, 52(7): 1-12. |
[12] | 刘琳,魏玲,钱婷. 决策形式背景中具有置信度的三支规则提取[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2017, 52(2): 101-110. |
[13] | 陈雪,魏玲,钱婷. 基于AE-概念格的决策形式背景属性约简[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2017, 52(12): 95-103. |
[14] | 覃丽珍, 李金海, 王扬扬. 基于概念格的知识发现及其在高校就业数据分析中的应用[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2015, 50(12): 58-64. |
[15] | 汤亚强, 范敏, 李金海. 三元形式概念分析下的认知系统模型及信息粒转化方法[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2014, 49(08): 102-106. |
|