全渠道零售下二级闭环供应链的回收模式选择与减排策略

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.0.2024.246

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究由一个制造商和一个零售商组成的闭环供应链在全渠道零售模式下的回收渠道选择与低碳减排问题。考虑到受碳税政策规制的制造商通过投资减排技术来降低碳排放,量化全渠道零售模式下受销售价格和减排技术水平影响的需求函数。构建制造商回收和零售商回收情形下的全渠道闭环供应链博弈模型,分别求解相应的联合定价和与减排策略。进一步与无减排技术投入情形下闭环供应链的最优策略进行比较,得出制造商在全渠道零售模式下进行减排技术投入能够改善闭环供应链系统的利润和环境绩效。最后通过数值算例进一步分析不同回收方式、减排技术水平投入以及碳税政策对供应链决策的影响。研究发现,与零售商回收产品情形相比,制造商负责回收产品能够使得全渠道零售模式下闭环供应链获得更高利润同时产生更少的碳排放;适当提高碳税不仅可以提升制造商减排投入的积极性,还能提高旧产品的回收率。

关键词: 闭环供应链, 全渠道零售, 减排技术, 博弈分析

Abstract: This paper examines the choice of recycling channels and low carbon emissions reduction in a closed-loop supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer in an omni-channel retail model. A demand function influenced by sales price and level of abatement technology under the omni-channel retail model was quantified, taking into account that manufacturers regulated by carbon tax policies reduce carbon emissions by investing in abatement technology. An omni-channel closed-loop supply chain game model is constructed for the manufacturer-recycling and retailer-recycling scenarios, and the corresponding joint pricing and abatement strategies are solved separately. The optimal strategy for the closed-loop supply chain is then compared with that of the closed-loop supply chain without technological inputs, and it is concluded that manufacturers technological inputs can improve the profitability and environmental performance of the closed-loop supply chain system under the omni-channel retail model. Finally, numerical examples are used to further analyse the impact of different recycling methods, emission reduction technology levels and carbon tax policies on supply chain decisions. It is found that manufacturers are responsible for recycling their products, resulting in higher profits and lower carbon emissions in the closed-loop supply chain of the omni-channel retail model than if retailers were to recycle their products; an appropriate increase in the carbon tax would not only increase the incentive for manufacturers to invest in reducing emissions, but would also increase the recycling rate of used products.

Key words: closed-loop supply chain, omni-channel retailing, sustainability technology, game analysis

中图分类号:

F224

柏庆国,刘世豪,张颖,徐健腾. 全渠道零售下二级闭环供应链的回收模式选择与减排策略[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2025, 60(6): 18-30.

BAI Qingguo, LIU Shihao, ZHANG Ying, XU Jianteng. Recycling model selection and emission reduction strategies of a two-echelon closed-loop supply chain in omni-channel retailing[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2025, 60(6): 18-30.

参考文献

[1] WESSEH K P, LIN B. Environmental policy and double dividend in a transitional economy[J]. Energy Policy, 2019, 134:110947.
[2] KUMAR A, JAIN V, KUMAR S. A comprehensive environment friendly approach for supplier selection[J]. Omega, 2014, 42(1):109-123.
[3] HONG Xianpei, XU Lei, DU Peng, et al. Joint advertising, pricing and collection decisions in a closed-loop supply chain[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 167:12-22.
[4] 王晓迪,王玉燕,李璟. 公平关切下网络平台主导的E-闭环供应链决策及协调模型[J]. 系统管理学报,2019,28(5):964-972. WANG Xiaodi, WANG Yuyan, LI Jing.Decision and coordination model of E-CLSC dominant by network platform considering fairness concerns[J]. Journal of Systems & Management, 2019, 28(5):964-972.
[5] 闻卉,郑本荣,曹晓刚,等. 不同渠道权力结构下的双渠道闭环供应链定价与协调决策[J]. 运筹与管理,2020,29(6):65-74. WEN Hui, ZHENG Benrong, CAO Xiaogang, et al. Pricing and coordination of DUAL channel closed-loop supply chain with different channel power structure[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(6):65-74.
[6] ZHOU Xiaoyang, WEI Xiaoya, LIN Jun, et al. Supply chain management under carbon taxes: A review and bibliometric analysis[J]. Omega, 2021, 98:102295.
[7] LUO Ruiling, ZHOU Li, SONG Yang, et al. Evaluating the impact of carbon tax policy on manufacturing and remanufacturing decisions in a closed-loop supply chain[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2022, 245:108408.
[8] 焦建玲,汪耘欣,李兰兰. 碳税政策对考虑消费者偏好的闭环供应链影响[J]. 软科学,2016,30(2):107-111. JIAO Jianling, WANG Yunxin, LI Lanlan. The impact of carbon tax policy on a CLSC taking consumer preferences into consideration[J]. Soft Science, 2016, 30(2):107-111.
[9] YENIPAZARLI A. Incentives for environmental research and development: consumer preferences, competitive pressure and emissions taxation[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 276(2):757-769.
[10] YUAN Kaifu, DONG Hui. Pricing and decision of carbon emission reduction for closed-loop supply chain considering carbon trading mechanism[J]. Ecological Economy, 2019, 15(1):39-44.
[11] HE Ping, WANG Zheng, SHI V, et al. The direct and cross effects in a supply chain with consumers sensitive to both carbon emissions and delivery time[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2021, 292(1):172-183.
[12] DING Junfei, CHEN Weida, WANG Wenbin. Production and carbon emission reduction decisions for remanufacturing firms under carbon tax and take-back legislation[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2020, 143:106419.
[13] JUNG S H, FENG T J. Government subsidies for green technology development under uncertainty[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2020, 286(2):726-739.
[14] 李凤,程春龙,郭烨锋. 考虑零售商企业社会责任的低碳供应链政府补贴策略[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版),2024,59(1):85-99. LI Feng, CHENG Chunlong, GUO Yefeng.Government subsidy strategy of low carbon supply chain considering retailers corporate social responsibility[J]. Journal of Shandong University(Natural Science), 2024, 59(1):85-99.
[15] 周永务,李斐. 新零售运营管理面临的问题与挑战[J]. 系统管理学报,2022,31(6):1041-1055. ZHOU Yongwu, LI Fei. Problems and challenges by new retail operation management[J]. Journal of Systems & Management, 2022, 31(6):1041-1055.
[16] SHI Xiutian, DONG Ciwei, Cheng T C E. Does the buy-online-and-pick-up-in-store strategy with pre-orders benefit a retailer with the consideration of returns?[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2018, 206:134-145.
[17] GAO Fei, SU Xuanming. Omni-channel retail operations with buy-online-and-pick-up-in-store[J]. Management Science, 2017, 63(8):2478-2492.
[18] 邱菊,赵菊,房晓艺,等. 基于第三方物流服务定价的零售商BOPS策略研究[J]. 管理工程学报,2023,37(3):169-177. QIU Ju, ZHAO Ju, FANG Xiaoyi, et al. Analysis of a retailers BOPS strategy based on endogenous prices of third-party logistics services[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2023, 37(3):169-177.
[19] 江玉庆,刘利平,刘帆. BOPS模式下基于成本共担契约的供应链协调策略[J]. 控制与决策,2022,37(3):690-700. QIU Ju, JIANG Yuqing, LIU Liping, LIU Fan. Coordination strategy for supply chain with a cost sharing contract under BOPS mode[J]. Control and Decisions, 2022, 37(3):169-177.
[20] 孔瑞晓,官振中,罗利. 基于BOPS的全渠道供应链结构研究[J]. 管理学报,2019,16(7):1072-1080. KONG Ruixiao, GUAN Zhenzhong, LUO Li. Research on omni-channel supply chain structure with BOPS[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2019, 16(7):1072-1080.
[21] 刘斌,顾琼琼,石苗青. 考虑价格和服务联合决策的双渠道供应链BOPS模式选择[J]. 运筹与管理,2022,31(11):135-141. LIU Bin, GU Qiongqiong, SHI Miaoqing. Choice of BOPS mode for dual channel supply chain considering joint decision on price and service[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2022, 31(11):135-141.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed