消费者购买后悔的创新耐用产品供应链微分博弈

doi:10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.0.2023.174

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在长期动态环境下, 研究消费者在购买创新耐用产品后, 产生购买后悔行为对由制造商主导的二级动态供应链的影响。通过建立微分博弈模型, 采用汉密尔顿方程求解, 得出供应链上制造商批发价和零售商零售价的最优路径。通过算例仿真将数据变化以图像形式呈现, 进一步分析消费者购买后悔行为对此供应链上各决策变量的影响程度。结果表明, 消费者购买后悔会导致供应链上的创新耐用产品销量降低, 制造商和零售商的长期利润也随之降低, 但随着创新耐用产品投入市场时间变长, 产品的销量和制造商与零售商的长期利润均随之增加。此外, 当消费者购买后悔行为比例偏小且产品市场投入时间偏长时, 零售商的长期利润会出现岔分突变现象, 因此, 当产品的购买后悔行为比例较低时延长产品市场投入时间, 可大幅提高创新耐用产品的利润。

关键词: 消费者购买后悔, 创新产品, 供应链, 动态优化, 微分博弈

Abstract:

In the context of a long-term dynamic environment, this study investigates the impact of consumer regret behavior after purchasing innovative durable products on a manufacturer-led secondary dynamic supply chain. By establishing a differential game model and solving Hamilton equation, the optimal path for manufacturers' wholesale prices and retailers' retail prices in the supply chain is obtained. Through numerical simulation, the data changes are presented in the form of images to further analyze the impact of consumer purchase regret behavior on various decision variables in the supply chain. The results show that consumer purchase regret can lead to a decrease in sales of innovative durable products in the supply chain, and the long-term profits of manufacturers and retailers also decrease accordingly. But as the time for innovative durable products to enter the market increases, the sales volume of the products and the long-term profits of manufacturers and retailers also increase. In addition, when the proportion of consumer regret behavior is relatively small and the product market investment time is relatively long, the long-term profits of retailers will experience a bifurcation phenomenon. Therefore, when the proportion of purchase regret behavior is low, extending the product's market investment time can significantly increase the profit of this innovative durable product.

Key words: consumer purchase regret, innovative product, supply chain, dynamic optimization, differential game

中图分类号:

F274

朱一,刘振威. 消费者购买后悔的创新耐用产品供应链微分博弈[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(9): 56-63.

Yi ZHU,Zhenwei LIU. Differential game in supply chain of innovative products with double regrets of consumers[J]. JOURNAL OF SHANDONG UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE), 2024, 59(9): 56-63.

图/表 10

表1

图1

图2

图3

表2

图4

图5

表3

图6

图7

参考文献 21

1	李明乾. 我国新能源乘用车产业市场绩效与市场结构关系研究[J]. 经营与管理, 2022, (4): 176- 184.
	LI Mingqing . Research on the relationship between market performance and market structure of China's new energy passenger car industry[J]. Management and Administration, 2022, (4): 176- 184.
2	全雄文, 涂菶生, 魏杰. 新产品销售定价的制造商与销售商斯坦克尔伯格博弈[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2007, (8): 111- 117.
	QUAN Xiongwen , TU Fengsheng , WEI Jie . Steinkelberg game between manufacturers and sellers of new product sales pricing[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2007, (8): 111- 117.
3	段永瑞, 徐超, 刘晶晶. 考虑预期后悔的创新产品定价和质量决策研究[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2021, 26 (3): 185- 194.
	DUAN Yongrui , XU Chao , LIU Jingjing . Research on pricing and quality decisions of innovative products considering expected regret[J]. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2021, 26 (3): 185- 194.
4	JIANG B , NARASIMHAN C . Turut anticipated regret[J]. Management Science, 2017, 63 (12): 4308- 4323.
5	李小燕, 李锋. 竞争环境下基于双重微分博弈的低碳供应链动态优化与协调[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30 (7): 89- 94.
	LI Xiaoyan , LI Feng . Dynamic optimization and coordination of low-carbon supply chain based on double differential game in competitive environment[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30 (7): 89- 94.
6	霍沛军, 陈剑, 陈继祥. 两层供应链中的上游R & D补贴策略[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, (10): 1297- 1300.
	HUO Peijun , CHEN Jian , CHEN Jixiang . Upstream R & D subsidy strategy in two-tier supply chain[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2003, (10): 1297- 1300.
7	BASS F M . A new product growth model for consumer durables[J]. Manag Sci, 1969, 15 (5): 215- 227.
8	夏卫国, 张旭, 侯光明. 品牌溢出下新产品扩散模型研究: 以电影为例[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42 (10): 122- 130.
	XIA Weiguo , ZHANG Xu , HOU Guangming . Research on new product diffusion model under brand spillover—a case study of film[J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42 (10): 122- 130.
9	杨强, 丁勇. 移动互联时代技术创新产品扩散机制与对策[J]. 经营与管理, 2020, (4): 10- 13.
	YANG Qiang , DING Yong . Diffusion mechanism and countermeasures of technological innovation products in mobile Internet era[J]. Management and Administration, 2020, (4): 10- 13.
10	全雄文. 更新产品销售定价博弈研究[J]. 南开大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 44 (3): 1- 7.
	QUAN Xiongwen . Update the game research of product sales pricing[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Nankaiensis, 2011, 44 (3): 1- 7.
11	张成虎, 周梅华. 消费者后悔理论研究综述[J]. 江苏商论, 2010, (12): 32- 33.
	ZHANG Chenghu , ZHOU Meihua . Review of consumer regret theory[J]. Jiangsu Commercial Forum, 2010, (12): 32- 33.
12	王道平, 丁婧一, 周玉. 不同权力结构下考虑消费者后悔预期的再制造供应链定价研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2023, 43 (1): 114- 128.
	WANG Daoping , DING Jingyi , ZHOU Yu . Study on remanufacturing supply chain pricing considering consumer anticipated regret under different power structures[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2023, 43 (1): 114- 128.
13	YANG Feng , WANG Manman , ANG Sheng . Optimal remanufacturing decisions in supply chains considering consumers' anticipated regret and power structures[J]. Transportation Research Part E, 2021, 148.
14	高鹏, 杜建国, 聂佳佳, 等. 消费者后悔预期对IR技术创新策略的影响[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2019, 24 (2): 174- 182.
	GAO Peng , DU Jianguo , NIE Jiajia , et al. The impact of consumer regret expectations on IR technology innovation strategies[J]. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2019, 24 (2): 174- 182.
15	刘浪, 汪惠, 黄冬宏. 销售成本信息不对称下供应商风险规避的回购契约[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31 (1): 158- 167.
	LIU Lang , WANG Hui , HUANG Donghong . Repurchase contract of supplier risk avoidance under asymmetric cost of sales information[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31 (1): 158- 167.
16	KAHNEMAN D , TVERSKY A . On the psychology of prediction[J]. Psychological Review, 1973, 80 (4): 237- 251.
17	KAHNEMAN D , TVERSKY A . Prospect theory an analysis of decision under risk[J]. Econonetrica, 1979, 47 (2): 263- 291.
18	KAHNEMAN D , TVERSKY A . Subjective probability: a judement of representativeness[J]. Cognitive Psychology, 1972, (3): 430- 454.
19	MARTIN Lindstrom . Brand washed[M]. New York: Crown Business, 2011.
20	蒋中一. 动态最优化基础[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2015.
	JIANG Zhongyi . Fundamentals of dynamic optimization[M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2015.
21	ROBINSON B , LAKHANI C . Dynamic Price models for new-product planning[J]. Management Science, 1975, 21 (10): 1113- 1122.

相关文章 15

[1]	刘名武,郭玲,颜玥,杜烁铭. 关税和本土认同下两竞争供应链定价及利润弹性[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(9): 18-32.
[2]	王玉燕,孙煜林,林飞. 资金约束和交叉持股下低碳供应链的融资决策[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(9): 64-78.
[3]	郭婷婷,李娜. 规模不经济下考虑企业社会责任投入的闭环供应链回收渠道选择[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(9): 42-55.
[4]	税文兵,周东民,郭绍梅. 考虑产品质量和双边服务水平的线上线下竞合供应链协调[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(9): 33-41, 55.
[5]	李玲,王云博,李雅婷. 考虑品牌溢出效应的平台供应链分销策略[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(9): 9-17.
[6]	苏宁宁,何新华,胡文发. 绿色营销资金受限的供应链融资策略[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(11): 126-138.
[7]	张峰,梁嘉玮. 带噪声记忆的非零和随机微分博弈问题的充分最大值原理[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(10): 46-52.
[8]	史聪,张桂涛,张萧,林帅成. 碳配额与交易监管下基于区块链技术的平台供应链网络运营决策[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(1): 100-114, 123.
[9]	李凤,程春龙,郭烨锋. 考虑零售商企业社会责任的低碳供应链政府补贴策略[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(1): 85-99.
[10]	肖敏,张晓典,何新华. 公平关切下混销模式的E-供应链效率和公平度动态演进[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2024, 59(1): 72-84.
[11]	温艳,于溪源,胡劲松. 竞争型医药供应链研发创新策略及行为选择[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2023, 58(7): 18-31.
[12]	丁斌,朱玉杰. 信息谎报对再制造闭环供应链决策的影响[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2023, 58(5): 84-100.
[13]	郭婷婷,吴正祥. 不同权力结构下考虑制造商在线推介的双渠道供应链均衡[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2023, 58(11): 104-115.
[14]	刘雪琦,周岩. 外包再制造下考虑政府补贴的闭环供应链网络均衡[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2023, 58(1): 76-88.
[15]	周驰,王艺馨,于静. 批发,代理还是混合?——与自营平台竞争的复合平台销售模式选择策略[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2023, 58(1): 89-100.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

a	c_m	N	γ	t
0.002	100	10 000	10 000	50

a	c_m	N	γ	ζ₂
0.002	100	10 000	10 000	0.3

a	c_m	N	γ	ζ₁
0.002	100	50	10 000	0.3