您的位置：山东大学 -> 科技期刊社 -> 《山东大学学报（理学版）》

《山东大学学报(理学版)》 ›› 2021, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (10): 149-158.doi: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.9.2021.004

• • 上一篇    

考虑信息平台影响的供应链联合研发策略研究

孟庆春1,2,3,于宇1,2,3,金宗凯1,2,3,谢磊1,2,3*   

  1. 1.山东大学管理学院, 山东 济南 250100;2.山东大学社会超网络计算与决策模拟实验室, 山东 济南 250100;3.山东大学价值共创网络研究中心, 山东 济南 250100
  • 发布日期:2021-09-28
  • 作者简介:孟庆春(1973— ),男,博士,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为供应链管理. E-mail:meqich@sdu.edu.cn*通信作者. E-mail:lxie@sdu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(71974115)

Research on supply chain joint R&D strategy considering the influence of information platform

MENG Qing-chun1,2,3, YU Yu1,2,3, JIN Zong-kai1,2,3, XIE Lei1,2,3*   

  1. 1. School of Management, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, Shandong, China;
    2. Laboratory of Social Supernetwork Computation and Decision Simulation, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, Shandong, China;
    3. Research Center for Value Co-creation Network, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, Shandong, China
  • Published:2021-09-28

PDF (PC)

462

摘要： 基于消费者对信息平台可信度和产品绿色度的认知差异,构建包含零售商和制造商的Stackelberg博弈模型,探究信息平台影响下的供应链绿色产品研发策略,对比分析非联合研发策略和两种联合研发策略的优劣。研究表明:信息平台可信度和产品研发成功率的提高能推动绿色产品研发努力度和各方利润的增加;通过对比不同策略发现,存在收益共享比例的范围,使收益共享策略下的零售商和制造商利润都优于其他策略;尽管信息平台可信度的提高会使收益共享策略的研发努力度和零售商利润提升更快,但对制造商利润和供应链总利润的影响却并不明显。

关键词: 信息平台, 联合研发策略, 供应链, 绿色产品

Abstract: Based on the differences of consumers cognition on the credibility of information platform and product greenness, a Stackelberg game model including a retailer and a manufacturer was built to explore the R&D strategies of green products in supply chain under the influence of information platform, and the advantages and disadvantages of non-joint R&D strategy and two joint R&D strategies were compared and analyzed. The results show that the improvement of the credibility of information platform and the success rate of product R&D can promote the corporate effort and the profit of all parties. By comparing different strategies, it is found that when the revenue sharing ratio is in the middle range, the profit of both retailers and manufacturers under the revenue sharing strategy is better than other strategies. Although the improvement of information platform credibility leads to better manufacturers efforts and retailers profits under revenue sharing strategies, the impact on manufacturers profits and total supply chain profits is not obvious.

Key words: information platform, joint R&, D strategy, supply chain, green product

中图分类号: 

  • C934
[1] CHEN L J, XIA D Z, TANG O, et al. Supply chain collaboration for sustainability: a literature review and future research agenda[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2017, 194:73-87.
[2] HONG Z F, GUO X L. Green product supply chain contracts considering environmental responsibilities[J]. Omega, 2019, 83:155-166.
[3] GHOSH D, SHAH J. Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 164:319-329.
[4] 曹裕, 胡韩莉, 李青松. 成本分担契约下绿色供应链的环境标签策略选择研究[J/OL].中国管理科学:1-13[2021-01-14]. CAO Yu, HU Hanli, LI Qingsong. Research on environmental labeling strategy selection of green supply chain under cost sharing contract[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Management Science: 1-13[2021-01-14].
[5] 曹裕, 刘子豪.无政府激励的绿色供应链管理的可行性分析[J]. 管理工程学报, 2017, 31(2):119-127. CAO Yu, LIU Zihao. A feasibility analysis for practicing green supply chain management without government policy incentives[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2017, 31(2):119-127.
[6] ZHANG J X, LIU G W, ZHANG Q, et al. Coordinating a supply chain for deteriorating items with a revenue sharing and cooperative investment contract[J]. Omega, 2015, 56:37-49.
[7] 郭军华, 孙林洋, 张诚, 等. 碳税政策下考虑消费者低碳偏好的供应链定价与协调[J]. 系统工程, 2020,38(6):61-69. GUO Junhua, SUN Linyang, ZHANG Cheng, et al. Pricing and coordinating of supply chains considering the low-carbon preference of consumers under the carbon tax policy[J]. Systems Engineering, 2020, 38(6):61-69.
[8] 周艳菊, 胡凤英, 周正龙. 零售商主导下促进绿色产品需求的联合研发契约协调研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2020, 34(2):194-204. ZHOU Yanju, HU Fengying, ZHOU Zhenglong. Study on joint contract coordination to promote green product demand under the retailer-dominance[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2020, 34(2):194-204.
[9] 王一雷, 朱庆华, 夏西强. 基于消费偏好的供应链上下游联合减排协调契约博弈模型[J]. 系统工程学报, 2017,32(2):188-198. WANG Yilei, ZHU Qinghua, XIA Xiqiang. Supply chain upstream and downstream joint coordination contract game model based on consumer preference[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2017, 32(2):188-198.
[10] YU X N, LAN Y F, ZHAO R Q. Strategic green technology innovation in a two-stage alliance: vertical collaboration or co-development?[J]. Omega, 2021, 98:102116.
[11] KWARK Y, CHEN J Q, RAGHUNATHAN S. Online product reviews: implications for retailers and competing manufacturers[J]. Information Systems Research, 2014, 25(1):93-110.
[12] 崔芳, 崔文田, 林军, 等. 基于在线评论的新产品定向市场播种最优策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(11):15-25. CUI Fang, CUI Wentian, LIN Jun, et al. Optimal targeted seeding strategy for a new product based on online ratings[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2017, 26(11):15-25.
[13] 李余辉, 倪得兵, 唐小我. 基于企业社会责任的供应链企业质量信号传递博弈[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(7):38-47. LI Yuhui, NI Debing, TANG Xiaowo. Signaling quality in supply chains by corporate social responsibility[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(7):38-47.
[14] ZHAO Y, YANG S, NARAYAN V, et al. Modeling consumer learning from online product reviews[J]. Marketing Science, 2013, 32(1):153-169.
[15] 孙瑾, 郑雨, 陈静. 感知在线评论可信度对消费者信任的影响研究: 不确定性规避的调节作用[J]. 管理评论, 2020,32(4):146-159. SUN Jin, ZHENG Yu, CHEN Jing. The influence of credibility of online reviews on consumerstrust: the moderating role of uncertainty[J]. Management Review, 2020, 32(4):146-159.
[16] 董晓红, 刘征驰. 消费者搜寻、服务质量与B2C平台竞争优势[J]. 管理现代化, 2016, 36(3):90-92,125. DONG Xiaohong, LIU Zhengchi. Consumer search, service quality and B2C platform competitive advantage[J]. Modernization of Management, 2016, 36(3):90-92,125.
[17] 卢丽玲. 基于消费者偏好的信息公开和供应商选择研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2018. LU Liling. Study on information disclosure and supplier selection strategies under the consideration of consumer responsible preferences[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2018.
[18] KRAFT T, ZHENG Y C, ERHUN F. The NGOs dilemma: how to influence firms to replace a potentially hazardous substance[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2013, 15(4):649-669.
[19] KARAER Ö, KRAFT T, KHAWAM J. Buyer and nonprofit levers to improve supplier environmental performance[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2017, 26(6):1163-1190.
[20] KIM S H. Time to come clean? Disclosure and inspection policies for green production[J]. Operations Research, 2015, 63(1):1-20.
[21] CHEN S, ZHANG Q Q, ZHOU Y P. Impact of supply chain transparency on sustainability under NGO scrutiny[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2019, 28(12):3002-3022.
[1] 孙丹丹,李珂,谢礼斌,牟宗玉. 需求和成本扰动下闭环供应链的应急决策及协调研究[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2020, 55(7): 88-102, 110.
[2] 曲朋朋,周岩. 考虑制造商公平关切的闭环供应链网络均衡[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2020, 55(5): 114-126.
[3] 陈倩,李严锋. 分销合同下考虑附加定价的供应链优化问题[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2020, 55(12): 103-110.
[4] 仲伟硕,戴更新,牟宗玉. 生产成本扰动下规模不经济闭环供应链的应急决策及协调研究[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2020, 55(11): 96-110.
[5] 司凤山,王晶,戴道明. 考虑服务质量和延迟决策的双渠道供应链演化博弈分析[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2020, 55(1): 86-93, 101.
[6] 何新华,尤彩云,胡文发. 联合契约应对突发需求增大的供应链协调策略[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2019, 54(5): 68-76.
[7] 张克勇,李春霞,姚建明,李江鑫. 政府补贴下具风险规避的绿色供应链决策及协调[J]. 《山东大学学报(理学版)》, 2019, 54(11): 35-51.
[8] 张克勇,李江鑫,姚建明,李春霞. 竞争型零售商具公平敏感性的供应链决策[J]. 山东大学学报（理学版）, 2018, 53(9): 83-94.
[9] 陈良,胡劲松. 风险规避对不同类型双渠道供应链决策的影响[J]. 山东大学学报（理学版）, 2018, 53(5): 30-40.
[10] 刘京,周岩,郑英杰,王超胜. 考虑零售商公平关切和风险规避的绿色供应链最优决策[J]. 山东大学学报（理学版）, 2018, 53(5): 12-29.
[11] 肖迪,金雯雯. C2B电商情境下考虑横向竞争的供应链定价策略[J]. 山东大学学报（理学版）, 2018, 53(5): 53-60.
[12] 钟元,熊爽,张翠华,陈彗洁. 市场定价约束条件下的供应链质量改进容错决策[J]. 山东大学学报（理学版）, 2017, 52(6): 10-15.
[13] 段丁钰,周岩,张华民,徐明姣. 考虑零售商不公平厌恶行为的供应链网络均衡研究[J]. 山东大学学报（理学版）, 2017, 52(5): 58-69.
[14] 何新华,胡文发,许长延,陈继红. 考虑随机性与模糊性的应急服务供应链转运策略[J]. 山东大学学报（理学版）, 2016, 51(12): 67-77.
[15] 何新华, 胡文发, 肖敏. 突发事件下应急服务供应链的期权协同决策[J]. 山东大学学报（理学版）, 2015, 50(11): 81-90.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《山东大学学报(理学版)》编辑部　
地址: 山东省济南市山大南路27号山东大学中心校区（250100）　电话: +86-0531-88366917　E-mail: xblxb@sdu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发